For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, will be limited. Select races will be covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Massachusetts Electrical Utilities Deregulation Referendum, Question 4 (1998)
|Voting on Utilities|
|Not on ballot|
|Question 4 (Electrical Utilities Deregulation)|
Official results via: The Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth
Text of measure
The language that appeared on the ballot:
A YES VOTE would continue the new law changing the electric utility industry.
A NO VOTE would undo these changes in the electric utility industry.
This is a referendum on a law passed in 1997. A "yes" vote would continue the new law, and a "no" vote would undo the new law. The law changes the state's electric utility industry. Starting in March 1998, instead of buying power from the utility that owns the power lines, customers may choose to buy power from separate generating companies competing with each other to sell power to be delivered by the existing utility. Customers not choosing a new competing generating company will be provided power by their existing utility under a transition rate for 7 years, starting from a rate 10% less than 1997 rates. By September 1999, rates for such customers must be further reduced from 1997 rates (adjusted for inflation) by 5%. Subject to restrictions of the law, rates paid by such customers may be adjusted up or down if approved by the new state Department of Telecommunications and Energy.
The full text of the legislation enacted by Question 4 is available here.
|historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.|
- The referendum had the support of "Massachusetts consumer advocates, large and small employers, labor and environmental groups."
- The referendum would give a consumers a guaranteed rate cut, break up the utility monopoly, let consumers choose their electricity supplier, encourages new and cleaner energy sources, provide additional benefits for consumers on low and fixed incomes, and create thousands of new job.
- The referendum would "[force] average families to pay $3000 for [mismanagement] and white elephant nuclear plants."
- The referendum would "[scam] customers with fraudulent rate cuts."
- The referendum would "[kill] competition by subsidizing existing utilities."
- The referendum would "[endanger] family health and safety." by "keeping open dangerous nuclear plants and dirty coal/oil fired plants," "eliminating local protections against unneeded plant construction," and "discouraging development of clean, safe alternative energy."
- 1998 Online Massachusetts Voter Guide
- 1998 Massachusetts Ballot Measures Election Results]
- National Conference of State Legislatures
- Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth (via archive.org)
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
State of Massachusetts
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Commissioner of Education | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs | Secretary of Labor and Workforce Development | Chair of Public Utilities |
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court | Appeals Court | Superior Courts | District Courts | Probate and Family Courts | Juvenile Courts | Housing Courts | Land Courts | Boston Municipal Courts | Judicial selection in Massachusetts |