Arkansas
Kentucky
Polls are closed in Arkansas and Kentucky! Congressional and state legislative races on the ballot today. Results are now available!




Massachusetts State Income Tax Repeal Initiative, Question 1 (2008)

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

The State Income Tax Repeal, also known as Massachusetts Question 1, was an initiated state statute that appeared on the November 4, 2008 ballot in Massachusetts, where it was defeated.

It would have ended the state's current 5.3% income tax on wages, interest, dividends and capital gains. Massachusetts would have joined Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming in not taxing income. Two other states, New Hampshire and Tennessee, have an income tax only on interest and dividends.

Election results

Massachusetts Question 1 (State Income Tax Repeal)
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No2,070,69966.7%
Yes 914,420 29.5%

Official results via: The Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth Elections Division

Specific provisions

If it had passed, this proposed law would have:

  • Reduced the state personal income tax rate to 2.65% for all categories of taxable income for the tax year beginning on or after January 1, 2009.
  • Eliminated the tax for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010.
  • The personal income tax to which the initiative applied is the "income received or gain realized by individuals and married couples, by estates of deceased persons, by certain trustees and other fiduciaries, by persons who are partners in and receive income from partnerships, by corporate trusts, and by persons who receive income as shareholders of “S corporations” as defined under federal tax law."
  • Not affected the tax due on income or gain realized in a tax year beginning before January 1, 2009.
  • States that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.

Supporters

Supporters included:

Arguments in favor of Question 1

Notable arguments made in support of the measure included:

  • State politicians have not kept faith with their promises to taxpayers. The Massachusetts State Legislature blockaded a ballot question approved by the citizens of the commonwealth in 2000 that would have reduced the state income tax to 5%.
  • Three million Massachusetts taxpayers earning over $75,000 would save an average of $3,600 each annually.
  • Income tax receipts in Massachusetts account for 39 percent of overall state revenue. State legislators would still have $18 billion to spend if the income tax is repealed.[2]
  • Massachusetts currently taxes income at 5.3%. By eliminating this tax, a worker will receive a raise of more than 5.3%. This is a permanent raise (well, as long as the income tax is not subsequently re-enacted).
  • With the increased economic growth that results from eliminating the state income tax, other sources of revenue will increase at both the state and local level (more spending will lead to more sales tax revenue while higher demand for housing and commerce will increase property tax revenue).[3]

Opposition

Opponents included:

Arguments Against Question 1

Notable arguments made in opposition to the measure included:

  • Massachusetts would lose about 40% of its income and would deal an $11 billion blow to the state, with ripple effects throughout state government.[9]
  • It would put education, health care, public safety and infrastructure at risk.[10]
  • It would force the state to raise other taxes and fees in order to make up for lost revenues.
  • Massachusetts already pays less than the national average when it comes to income tax.[11]

Editorial Opposition

The Boston Globe officially asked voters to vote "no" on Question 1.[12]

Polls

See also Polls, 2008 ballot measures.
Month of Poll Pollster Yes No Undecided Reference
October 2008 Suffolk/7News 26 percent 59 percent 14 percent [13]

History of petition drive

The proponents submitted about 100,000 signatures to the Massachusetts Secretary of State for the first phase of signature collection. 76,084 of those signatures were determined to be valid, with a requirement that 66,593 must be valid for the initiative to proceed to the next step.[14] The next step was for the Massachusetts State Legislature to take up the measure. They declined to pass it by the first Wednesday in May 2008, meaning that the proponents had to collect an additional 11,099 valid signatures by June 18, 2008. On July 3, it was announced that 15,913 additional certified signatures had been filed, making the measure extremely likely to appear on the ballot.[15],[16]

The Massachusetts Teachers Association made phone calls to people who signed the petition to place the income tax repeal on the ballot, inquiring about whether their signature was valid. [17]

Funding

According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008 the Committee for Small Government has raised approximately $385,000 since creation and has $14,131.72 cash left. They also have about $80,000 in outstanding liabilities. [18]

The Coalition for Our Communities has raised approximately $6,625,000 since creation and has $117,270.95 cash left. They also received about an additional $650,000 in inkind donations from unions such as donated staff, supplies, postage ect. [19]


Earlier attempts to repeal Massachusetts state income tax

The Committee for Small Government advanced a similar initiative, called the End the Income Tax initiative, in 2002. That measure did not pass and received 885,683 votes, or 45.3 percent, of the vote.[20]

See also

Suggest a link

External links

References

Additional reading

Personal tools