Minnesota Voter Identification Amendment, Amendment 2 (2012)
The proposal would have required that all voters in the state show photo identification before voting. Legislation to enact similar laws without a constitutional amendment passed both chambers of the Minnesota Legislature, but were vetoed by Governor of Minnesota Mark Dayton.
- See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
|Minnesota Amendment 2|
These results are certified and final.
In late February, 2012, Minnesota lawmakers reportedly began considering an alternative to the voter ID amendment. The alternative is a so-called "electronic poll book" and is currently circulating the legislature as a bill. Democratic Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has touted the poll book as a less expensive option that would allow election officials to look up existing drivers' license photos or take new ones of voters at polling places. Secretary Ritchie spoke to a House committee on the suggestion saying that it would be an easier system for many voters, his examples included those who no longer drive, or those who have changed addresses whiteout updating their ID. Some in the legislature see the bill as a diversionary tactic or as a law to merely augment the amendment, such as, state Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer who said, "We see it as complementary, maybe, but not a substitute." Others, such as, Republican Senator John Howe see it as an alternative to using the amendment process, saying, "I can’t speak to whether this does anything on the constitutional amendment for photo ID. But I can tell you that I personally, along with many of my colleagues, want to see things done as much as we can legislatively."
Text of measure
The question presented to the voters was as follows:
Photo Identification Required for Voting.
"Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?"
- The campaign to pass the amendment is led by the Protect My Vote ballot committee.
- Senator Scott Newman
- Former Senator Norm Coleman
- Dan McGrath, chairman of Protect My Vote and executive director of Minnesota Majority
- Sen. Scott Newman, the bill author, called the proposal an "additional measure of integrity." According to reports, Newman said his proposal is to add "photo ID mandate to age, residency and citizenship voting requirements already in the state Constitution."
- Some supporters argued that the perception of voter fraud and the resultant damage in public trust is just as damaging as actual voter fraud. They argued that a voter ID system would not only help to curtail fraud, but also restore confidence in the election system.
- "A new voter ID would disproportionately affect older voters because we know they're less likely to have the required identification," said Amy McDonough, a spokesperson with AARP. The AARP, or American Association of Retired Persons, was against the proposed measure.
- In an article printed by MinnPost.com, Secretary Ritchie argued that the amendment would effectively end same day registration and voting. According to Secretary Ritchie, because the amendment stipulated that identity and eligibility must be verified before a ballot can be cast, the ballots of voters who registered at the polling place would not be counted until some time after election day.
Tactics and strategies
- In February the ACLU of Minnesota offered a $1,000 reward to anyone who could find a convicted case of voter impersonation, a kind of voter fraud that would be prevented by the voter-ID law. In March, Dan McGrath, of Minnesota Majority, claimed the prize showing court records of 2008 case in which a woman voted twice, once in her own name, and once in her daughter's name through an absentee ballot. Chuck Samuelson, executive director of ACLU-Minnesota, said he would review the case and award the prize if everything checked out, however, he did add that the fact that prosecutors found the case means that the current system is working without voter ID.
- The Willmar Area League of Women Voters has planned program on the amendment to be held at 7 p.m. on May 14 at the Bethel Lutheran Church in Willmar.
- On Sunday, August 26, 2012, 200 individuals marched through Minneapolis in protest of the amendment.
|2012 measure lawsuits|
| Arizona • Arkansas • Colorado • Florida • Maryland |
Michigan • Massachusetts • Minnesota
Missouri • Montana • Nevada
North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma
Oregon • Rhode Island
|By lawsuit type|
|Ballot text |
Motivation of sponsors
The American Civil Liberties Union has filed with the Minnesota Supreme Court challenging the wording of the ballot question itself. Charles Samuelson, executive director of the ACLU-MN, said, "This ballot proposal is incredibly troubling because it asks voters to put an amendment in the Constitution in a manner that is misleading, confusing and unclear."
The court scheduled oral arguments for July 17. Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has asked the court to decide the case by August 27 so that there will be enough time for ballots to be designed and printed for voters to access absentee ballots.
- See also: Polls, 2012 ballot measures
- According to a KSTP/SurveyUSA poll, conducted October 12 through 14, 53 percent of people surveyed said they would vote for the amendment, 40 percent said they would not and 7 percent remain undecided. The survey was conducted with a pool of 550 likely voters and has a margin of error is +/- 4.3 percent.
|Date of Poll||Pollster||In favor||Opposed||Undecided||Number polled|
|Oct. 12-14, 2012||SurveyUSA||53%||40%||7%||550|
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Minnesota Constitution
Proposed amendments must be agreed to by a majority of the members of each chamber of the Minnesota State Legislature.
In Minnesota, the only type of ballot measures permitted are legislatively-referred constitutional amendments. Pursuing a ballot amendment instead of normal legislation allows lawmakers to circumvent a veto by Gov. Mark Dayton (D). One of the chief proponents of a voter identification requirement was Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer (R). Before attempting to take the issue to the ballot, she pursued two bills which would have mandated voter identification via traditional legislation. These bills were as follows:
House File 210's companion Senate bill, SF 509, has since been passed by the Senate and the House. However, Governor Dayton vetoed the bill on May 26, 2011. Prepared for the veto, Kiffmeyer and others proposed the following ballot amendment: Minnesota House File 1597.
On February 22, 2012, the Senate State Government Innovation and Veterans Committee approved the amendment 8-5 along party lines.
On March 19, the Minnesota Rules and Legislative Administration Committee approved the amendment, thereby passing it on to the full House, where it was approved.
However, the measure was held off the ballot. Another version of the bill was being considered in legislature, therefore a conference committee drafted a compromise bill, one that would be placed on the ballot should the state legislature approve it. According to reports, the compromise bill was passed unanimously by the committee, sending it one more time to the lawmaking body for ballot approval.
- 2012 ballot measures
- Minnesota 2012 ballot measures
- News: Minnesota Voter ID Amendment heads to the ballot
| By Eric Veram|
Ballot measure writer
|Email • Submit a link|
- Minnesota Public Radio,"Amendment proposals include voter ID, tax laws," January 16, 2012
- Star Tribune,"GOP proposing amendments to avert possible veto on legislation," April 27, 2011
- The Minnesota Independent, "Kiffmeyer wants voter ID on the ballot in 2012," April 15, 2011
- Minnesota Public Radio "PoliGraph: Higgins' voter ID claim accurate," March 28, 2012
- Post Bulletin "Answer Man: Voter ID law would affect absentees, too," March 28, 2012
- Alexandria Echo Press "Column - Voters should nix proposed amendments," April 13, 2012
- Newsmax," Fight Over Minnesota Voter ID Amendment Heats Up," October 17, 2012
- ↑ MPR News, "Kiffmeyer says photo ID requirement could be placed on the ballot", April 14, 2011
- ↑ The Minnesota Independent,"Republicans introduce voter ID constitutional amendment," April 28, 2011
- ↑ Albert Lea Tribune "Lawmakers mull a substitute voter ID plan," February 29, 2012
- ↑ Minnesota Legislature "House File 2738 (2012)" (Lines 2.8 to 2.10)
- ↑ Minnesota Legislature "House File 131 (2011)" (Lines 1.6 to 1.9)
- ↑ Minnpost.com,"Voter ID: With no evidence of either a current problem or a credible solution, it's a waste of money," October 17, 2012
- ↑ Minnesota Public Radio,"Minnesota Majority's Dan McGrath on group's support for voter ID amendment," October 18, 2012
- ↑ Grand Forks Herald,"Proposed voter photo ID amendment receives first examination at Minnesota Legislature," February 1, 2012
- ↑ Minnesota Public Radio,"Even the perception of fraud makes voter ID measure a good idea," September 6, 2012
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 KARE 11,"Voter ID amendment gets first debate," February 2, 2012
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 West Central Tribune "Program on voter ID is tonight at Bethel in Willmar, Minn.," ay 14, 2012
- ↑ MinnPost "Could Photo ID be scuttled even if Minnesota voters approve constitutional amendment?" May 22, 2012
- ↑ KEYC "New Website Addresses Proposed Amendments To The State Constitution," May 23, 2012
- ↑ Minnesota Public Radio "Mondale, Carlson to lead voter ID opposition," June 26, 2012
- ↑ Newsmax.com," Fight Over Minnesota Voter ID Amendment Heats Up," October 17, 2012
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named
- ↑ Star Tribune "Group claims $1,000 ACLU prize for finding voting fraud," March 6, 2012
- ↑ OpEdNews.com "Marching Against Voter Suppression in Minnesota," August 27, 2012
- ↑ Alexandria Echo Press "Voter ID amendment: Minnesota’s version of ‘Papers, please’?" June 22, 2012
- ↑ Winona Daily News "Minn. lawmakers defend voter ID measure validity," June 27, 2012
- ↑ SurveyUSA,"3 Weeks Till Votes Are Counted, 'Yes' on Minnesota Marriage Amendment Now in Jeopardy; Obama Steady Atop Romney; Klobuchar Re-Elected:," October 15, 2012
- ↑ The Minnesota Daily, "Voter ID passes House, headed to Senate," May 6, 2011
- ↑ Minneapolis Star Tribune, "Voter ID-card bill clears House," May 6, 2011
- ↑ Star Tribune, "Photo ID for voting is on a fast track," April 30, 2011
- ↑ Associated Press "Minnesota Committee Advances Voter ID Ballot Measure," February 23, 2012
- ↑ Minnesota Public Radio "Full Minn. House to take up voter ID amendment," March 19, 2012
- ↑ Associated Press "Senate passes photo ID, but critics vow litigation," March 24, 2012
- ↑ Star Tribune, "An all-GOP conference panel sent the proposed constitutional amendment to full Legislature", April 2, 2012
- ↑ Star Tribune "Voter ID amendment is now up to Minnesota's voters," April 4, 2012
State of Minnesota
St. Paul (capital)
Minnesota State Constitution | House of Representatives | Senate | County Attorney | House Research Department | Legislative Reference Library | Senate Counsel Research and Fiscal Analysis | Legislative Auditor |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Commissioner of Management and Budget | State Auditor | Commissioner of Education | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Commissioner of Natural Resources | Commissioner of Labor and Industry | Chair of Public Utilities |
Data Practices Act | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations |