Minnesota state budget (2009-2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The state of Minnesota was facing an estimated $1.2 billion budget deficit for FY 2010 and a nearly $3 billion budget shortfall overall as of May 10, 2010.[1][2]

Minnesota had a total state debt of $21,206,734,818 when calculated by adding the total of outstanding debt, pension and OPEB UAAL’s, unemployment trust funds and the 2010 budget gap as of July 2010.[3]

2009-2010 budget crisis

In 2009 Gov. Tim Pawlenty stood his ground by closing Minnesota’s budget deficit without raising taxes.[4] The Minnesota State Legislature passed the FY 2010 budget; however, the governor used his un-allotment power to modify it and presented the budget changes that went into effect July 1, 2009.[5]

According to Gov. Tim Pawlenty's 2010 State of the State Address, the governor's "Jobs Creation Bill" included proposed tax cuts and incentives for the FY 2011 budget. Proposed cuts included: 20 percent reduction in the corporate tax rate, 20 percent exclusion from taxation for small businesses and tax credits for early-stage companies.[6]

The legislature would be able to review Gov. Pawlenty's un-allotments when it convened on February 4, 2010, but would be constrained by ongoing decreasing revenues and an estimated $5.9 billion deficit for the FY 2012/2013 biennium.[7][8] Minnesota's Management and Budget Office's First Quarter FY 2010 Revenue Report, released October 2009, showed:[9]

  • Individual income tax revenue July-September 2009 down 5.4%, $93 million from end of 2009 legislative session estimates
  • Sales tax receipts July-September 2009 down 2.3%, $20 million from end of 2009 legislative session estimates
  • Corporate income tax revenue July-September up 41.1%, $52 million from end of 2009 legislative session estimates
  • Motor vehicles tax revenue July-September up 25%, $4 million from end of 2009 legislative session estimates
  • Other revenues up 1.1%, $4 million from end of 2009 legislative session estimates

Total revenues for the first quarter of FY 2010 1.7%, $52 million below end of 2009 legislative session estimates

2008-2009 budget crisis

See also: Minnesota state budget (2008-2009)

Budget background

See also: Minnesota state budget

Minnesota operates on a biennium, covering two fiscal years at a time. A fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 of the following year; however, the biennium begins July 1 of odd-numbered years. The process of creating a new state budget begins in even-numbered years. All state agencies submit budget requests for the next biennium along with actual expenditures and receipts for the two most recent fiscal years. The governor then submits a three-part budget to the legislature. Part one is a budget message, part two a detailed operating budget, and part three a capital expenditures budget. Parts one and two are presented to the legislature in January or February of odd-numbered years and part three is presented to the legislature in January of even-numbered years. Both the House and the Senate examine, modify and enact the final budget.[10][11]

Minnesota's “un-allotment” law specifies conditions under which the executive branch can reduce expenditures to prevent an anticipated budget deficit.[12] The key part of the law provides:[13]

  • (a) If the commissioner [of finance] determines that probable receipts for the general fund will be less than anticipated, and that the amount available for the remainder of the biennium will be less than needed, the commissioner shall, with the approval of the governor, and after consulting the legislative advisory commission, reduce the amount in the budget reserve account as needed to balance expenditures with revenue.
  • (b) An additional deficit shall, with the approval of the governor, and after consulting the legislative advisory commission, be made up by reducing unexpended allotments of any prior appropriation or transfer. Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner is empowered to defer or suspend prior statutorily created obligations which would prevent effecting such reductions.

Budget figures

The following table provides a history of Minnesota's expenditures and gross domestic product (GDP).

Fiscal year Expenditures (billions) GDP (billions)
2000 $35.4[14] $185.1[14]
2001 $38.0[14] $190.2[14]
2002 $40.5[14] $198.6[14]
2003 $41.3[14] $208.2[14]
2004 $42.1[14] $223.5[14]
2005 $42.9[14] $232.0[14]
2006 $44.8[14] $242.1[14]
2007 $46.7[14] $255.0[14]
2008 $48.7[14] $268.5[14]
2009 $50.8*[14] $282.8*[14]
  • NOTE: The figures for FY 2009 had not been finalized at the time this table was built.


Accounting principles

See also: Minnesota government accounting principles

Minnesota auditing authority is divided between the State Auditor and the Legislative Auditor. The Office of the State Auditor is a constitutional office that is charged with overseeing more than $20 billion spent annually by local governments in Minnesota, publishing its audit reports online. The Office of the Legislative Auditor audits state agencies and constitutional offices, and also publishes its audit reports online.[15]

Rebecca Otto was elected Minnesota State Auditor in 2006.[16] Jim Nobles had been the Legislative Auditor for the State of Minnesota since 1983, an appointed position under the Legislative Audit Commission. In addition to the office's primary focus on state agencies and programs, the office also audits three metropolitan agencies and selectively reviews programs that are administered locally.[17]

Budget transparency

Disregarding the mandate of Minnesota House File 548, State Government Omnibus bill (2007), Minnesota did not launch a spending database until March 2009 (over one year after the mandated launch date).[18][19] According to an article in The Star Tribune, the Department of Administration had not launched the website because "an old state computer system, which was being updated, was not Internet-friendly. It's not clear if the new computer system will include a spending database because the legislature didn't appropriate the $1 million to $1.5 million needed for it."[20]

The actual expense of building the site was far less than initially expected. Curt Yoakum, Legislative Liaison for the Department of Management and Budget in 2009, said that the spending database was developed with existing resources and a mere $5,000 consulting fee. The site's designers even overcame an antiquated accounting system that appeared unsuited to internet.

According to a press release from the Office of the Governor, "The site was created by Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) and offers on-line, round-the-clock access to data on state payments for schools, local governments, contractors and other vendors. With just a few clicks, citizens can access detailed information on most state spending. The data is supplied by the state's accounting system and updated nightly."[18]

Government tools

The following table is helpful in evaluating the level of transparency provided by a state spending and transparency database:

Criteria for evaluating spending databases
State database Searchability Grants Contracts Line item expenditures Dept./agency budgets Public employee salary
TAP Minnesota Y
600px-Yes check.png
N
600px-Red x.png
Y
600px-Yes check.png
N
600px-Red x.png
{{{1}}}
N
600px-Red x.png

Public employee salary information

See also: Minnesota state government salary

Economic stimulus transparency

Minnesota would receive approximately $448 million from the federal government under H.R. 1586, a $26 billion plan to give states money for Medicaid and education that the President signed into law on August 10, 2010.[21]

The Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 designated $787 billion to be spent throughout the nation. Of that $787 billion stimulus package, it was estimated that 69%, or over $541 billion, would be administered by state governments.[22] Minnesota would receive an estimated $2,514,686,494.[23]

Reports showed that 65 bonding projects had borrowed $684 million in stimulus bonds.[24] The Freedom Foundation of Minnesota found that some of these projects included: municipal swimming pools, a multi-million dollar golf course renovation and a new mega-community center.[24]

One Minnesota project was noted in Senator Coburn's and Senator McCain's "Summertime Blues, 100 stimulus projects that give taxpayers the blues" report. One project gave the towns of Woodbury and Eagan, Minnesota $1.8 million in stimulus funds for the heating systems at the local ice rinks.[25]

Error in ARRP

According to Recovery.gov, federal stimulus funds would go to 884 congressional districts, though there are only 435.[26][27]

The ARRP website created 11 new congressional districts in Minnesota, adding to its existing eight districts. The website listed Minnesota as having a total of 19 congressional districts. Altogether, the 11 extra congressional districts posted received more than $7 million in stimulus spending, creating or saving about 50 jobs.[28]

See also

External links

Additional reading

References

  1. Star Tribune,"Legislature returns, staring into the teeth of $1.2B deficit," February 4, 2010
  2. KSFY.com "Pawlenty Threatens State Government Shutdown" May 8, 2010
  3. State Budget Solutions “States Hide Trillions in Debt” July 22, 2010
  4. Wall Street Journal, "Pawlenty Garners Attention With Budget Move," July 11, 2009
  5. National Conference of State Legislatures, "Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Status," October 13, 2009
  6. Minnesota Governor,"2010 State of the State Address," February 11, 2010
  7. Minnesota State Legislature Web site, retrieved October 27, 2009
  8. Minnesota Management and Budget, "Consolidated Fund Statement: End of 2009 Legislative Session, Includes July 2009 Executive Actions ," July 17, 2009
  9. Minnesota Management and Budget Office, "FY 2010-11 Revenues 1.7 Percent Below Forecast," October 2009
  10. Minnesota Legislative Reference Library,"Resources on Minnesota Issues State Budget," December 2008
  11. Minnesota Management and Budget,"2010-11 Governor's Budget Instructions & Forms," retrieved March 18,2009
  12. Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes, "Minn. Stat. § 16A.152, subd. 4.," retrieved October 27, 2009
  13. Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department, "Unallotment: Executive Branch Power to Reduce Spending to Avoid a Deficit," March 2008
  14. 14.00 14.01 14.02 14.03 14.04 14.05 14.06 14.07 14.08 14.09 14.10 14.11 14.12 14.13 14.14 14.15 14.16 14.17 14.18 14.19 US Government Spending,"Minnesota State and Local spending," retrieved March 17,2009
  15. Minnesota Office of the State Auditor Web site, retrieved October 27, 2009
  16. Minnesota Office of the State Auditor Web site, retrieved October 27, 2009
  17. Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor Web site, retrieved October 27, 2009
  18. 18.0 18.1 Office of the Governor, "GOVERNOR PAWLENTY UNVEILS NEW STATE WEBSITE TO ALLOW CITIZENS TO TRACK GOVERNMENT SPENDING ONLINE," March 26, 2009
  19. Minnpost.com, "Many states, including Minnesota, lag in putting their spending on the Internet," February 27, 2009
  20. Star Tribune, "A blogger's quest: Where's the database?" May 15, 2009
  21. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named totals
  22. National Taxpayers Union, "A Letter to the Nation's Governors: Ensure Transparency and Accountability by Posting Stimulus Expenditures Online," March 10, 2009
  23. Wall Street Journal,"Stimulus Spending by State," March 12,2009
  24. 24.0 24.1 Minnesota Communities go on Spending Spree Funded by Stimulus Bonds, July 28, 2010
  25. "Summertime Blues, 100 stimulus projects that give taxpayers the blues" August 2010
  26. $6.4 Billion Stimulus goes to Phantom Districts, Watchdog.org, November 17, 2009
  27. Stimulus Creates Jobs in Non-Existent Congressional Districts, Watchdog.org, November 16, 2009
  28. Stimulus and Jobs, Freedom Foundation of Minnesota, November 16, 2009