Missouri ballot news archive
- Supporters of abortion rights (who are opposed to this initiative) filed a lawsuit claiming that the ballot title written by Robin Carnahan's office does not fully explain that the initiative, if approved, could bar abortions at public hospitals and possibly also put the state in conflict with Medicaid requirements.
- Missouri Roundtable for Life, supporters of the initiative, say that Carnahan's title is biased and misleading in such a way as to artifically skew public perception against the initiative.
Eminent domain lawsuits in Missouri
Missouri Citizens for Property Rights is holding off on collecting signatures on the Missouri Eminent Domain Reform Initiatives (2010) because of two lawsuits filed by the Missouri Municipal League. The lawsuits, filed against the state government, allege that the fiscal impact statements prepared by the state auditor and the ballot language approved by the Missouri Secretary of State are misleading. In particular, the Missouri Municipal League believes that the fiscal note prepared by the state auditor is wrong because it underestimates the costs on cities.
According to Ron Calzone, president of Missouri Citizens for Property Rights, "It's their [the Missouri Municipal League] goal to tie us up in court as long as they can to limit the amount of time we have to collect signatures. The frustrating thing about it is that the Missouri Municipal League is funded by cities, so the very cities that are abusing eminent domain power are using taxpayer money to keep this off the ballot and squelch the taxpayer."
Duelling ballot title lawsuits
Supporters and opponents of the Missouri No Public Funds for Stem Cell Research Initiative (2010) have filed lawsuits against the Missouri Secretary of State's office. Each side believes the ballot title as written mis-states what the measure does.
Missouri group faults Carnahan
The Missouri Roundtable for Life organization is criticizing Missouri Secretary of State Carnahan for the ballot title she wrote to describe an initiative headed for the Missouri 2010 ballot that seeks to ban the use of tax dollars for abortion, human cloning or other similar procedures.
Legislators wants to make ballot access more difficult
- HB 228 would outlaw ut-of-state circulators, forbid paying circulators on a per-person basis, and require circulators to work only one petition at a time.
- HJR3 would boost the number of signatures needed to get an initiative on the ballot, from 8% of the last gubernatorial vote (for a state Constitutional change) and 5% (for a statute), to, respectively, 10% and 8%
- HJR4 would say that initiatives need to receive 60% of the popular vote in order to pass.
- Kansas City Star, "Missouri abortion initiative attacked from all sides," March 27, 2009
- Springfield Business Journal Online, "Eminent domain petitions await court decisions," March 16, 2009
- Fulton Sun, "Eminent domain petitioning to return to a street corner near you," January 23, 2009 (dead link)
- KOMU-TV, "Ballot Battle," February 12, 2009 (dead link)
- Group faults Carnahan's ballot language
- Ballot Access News, "More Missouri Anti-Initiative Bills," January 24, 2009