Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.
National Petition Management
From Ballotpedia
| Petition Companies |
|---|
|
Contents |
Petition drive
2010
- Proposition 17: $2,273,745[1]
- Proposition 20: $1,937,380[2]
- Proposition 23: $2,222,312
- Proposition 26: $2,341,023
2009
NPM collected the signatures to put the Maine Same-Sex Marriage People's Veto, Question 1 on the ballot. The firm was paid $308,000 for the signatures they collected in this petition drive.[3][4]
2008
California
NPM was the signature vendor for the California Safe Neighborhood Act, at a cost of $1.022 million.[5]
Missouri
NPM collected the signatures to qualify a gambling loss limits repeal measure for the ballot in Missouri, at a cost of $1,076,956.[6]
2006
- California Proposition 88. $4,226,620 paid to NPM.[7]
External links
- National Petition Management website
- List of petition drives managed by NPM
- Meet National Petition Management
- NPM corporation filings
References
- ↑ Expenditure details for "Yes on Proposition 17" campaign
- ↑ Campaign expenditures, VOTERS FIRST
- ↑ Times Herald Online, "Marriage doesn't need protecting from gays", December 9, 2009
- ↑ Nolan Chart, "Maine Question 1: Where Did the Money Go?", December 17, 2009
- ↑ Campaign expenditure details
- ↑ FOR SCHOOLS FIRST COALITION Expenditure details
- ↑ Expenditure detail for Yes on 88
