Click here to live chat with one of our writers between 9am-5pm CST.
Nevada Eminent Domain Amendment, Question 4 (2010)
From Ballotpedia
| Nevada Constitution |
|---|
| Articles |
| Preliminary Action • Ordinance • Preamble • 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • XVIII • 19 • Election Ordinance |
Contents |
The proposal prohibited the taking of private property if it was to be transferred to a private party.[1][2]
Election results
- See also: 2010 ballot measure election results
| Question 4 (Eminent Domain) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 440,244 | 67.28% | |||
| Yes | 214,086 | 32.72% | ||
| Total votes | 654,330 | 100.00% | ||
| Voter turnout | % | |||
Source: Nevada Secretary of State - November 2 official results
Text of measure
Title
According to the Nevada Secretary of State's office, the ballot question read as follows:[3]
Shall Article 1, Section 22 of the Nevada Constitution be repealed and shall Article 1, Section 8 of the Nevada Constitution be amended to revise provisions relating to eminent domain proceedings?
Constitutional changes
If approved by voters, the proposed measure would have repealed Article 1, Section 22 and amended Section 8 of Article 1 of the Nevada Constitution.[4] The amended section can be read here.
Media editorial positions
Opposition
- The Reno Gazette-Journal was opposed to Question 4. "An initiative (PISTOL) sought, in clear and concise language, to put a stop to these transfers once and for all and to give property owners legal tools to use in the event their property was targeted for taking by the government. The initiative passed with over 60% voter approval in both 2006 and 2008. Voters understood the issues and chose to pass the initiative in two successive elections, so there is no reason to change anything here. They are seeking simply to sidestep the voters," said the editorial board.[5]
Path to the ballot
A majority vote was required (in two successive sessions) of the Nevada State Legislature to qualify the proposed measure for the 2010 ballot.
See also
Articles
- Nevada's 2010 ballot - all about judicial reform, eminent domain and taxes
- Four ballot questions scheduled to appear on Nevada 2010 ballot
External links
Additional reading
References
- ↑ The Record-Courier,"Lawmakers approve four ballot questions," May 9, 2010
- ↑ Associated Press,"State panel sends four measures to November ballot," May 9, 2010
- ↑ Nevada Secretary of State,"Questions to Appear on the 2010 General Election Ballot," retrieved September 27, 2010
- ↑ Nevada State Legislature,"AJR 3," retrieved September 27, 2010
- ↑ The Reno Gazette-Journal,"Two Cents Worth: Ballot questions: Four No, one Yes...," October 22, 2010
State of Nevada Carson City (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Ballot measures |
List of Nevada ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process | |
| Government |
Nevada State Constitution | House of Representatives | Senate | Legislative Counsel Bureau | Legislative Auditor | |
| State executive officers |
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Controller | State Treasurer | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Conservation and Natural Resources | Director of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation | Chairman of Public Utilities Commission | |
| Judiciary |
Nevada Supreme Court | Supreme Court elections | Commission on Judicial Discipline | Judicial Nominating Commission | Judicial news | Judicial activist organizations | |
| Transparency Topics |
Open Records Act | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations | |
| Divisions |
State |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of School Districts | |

