WhoRunsTheStates Badge.png
Who Runs Your State Government?
Does your state lean blue or lean red? Check out our new report, highlighting partisan control of state government from 1992-2013.






North Dakota Marriage Amendment (2004)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Clipboard48.png This statewide ballot measure article does not meet Ballotpedia's quality standards. It needs to be revised and cleaned up.

Voting on
Marriage and Family
Wedding rings.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot

Contents

The North Dakota Defining Marriage Amendment was on the November 2004 ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved.

Election results

North Dakota Amendment 1 (2004)
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 223,572 73.23%
No81,71626.77%

Election Results via: North Dakota Secretary of State

Ballot impact

The ballot stated marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

Supporters

Christina Rondeau, director of the North Dakota Family Alliance, which coordinated an initiative campaign to get the measure on the ballot, said she was not surprised by the ease with which it passed.

"It just keeps being evident to me that this really is the people's issue," she said. "We've taken a lot of the credit and a lot of the heat for being the organization that has kind of taken the lead on this issue, (but) there's no denying the fact that the citizens of North Dakota ... made it clear they wanted it on the ballot and then came out in support of it." [1]

Opponents

Equality North Dakota chairman Robert Uebel, a spokesman for gay and lesbian rights, said he was disappointed with the vote but considered it just the beginning of the battle. He predicted the law eventually will go the way of others, such as those that once barred women and blacks from voting.

"This is really the first time in North Dakota that our issues have been center stage," Uebel said. "When you're talking about discussion on a statewide level, it has just begun in this state.

"Our organization is stronger, our community is stronger as a result of this campaign," he said.

Uebel said the issue "goes well beyond just simply defining marriage" and also could affect such things as domestic partnership benefits. [2]

Financing the campaign

Only $8,974 was spent on the campaign, all from the "no" side.

Some of the donors to the anti-campaign were:

  • North Dakota Human Rights Coalition, $2,000.[3]

References

External links

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Encyclopedia
Calendars
Get Involved
Donate
Toolbox