North Dakota Tobacco Settlement Constitutional Amendment (2010)
| Not on Ballot |
|---|
|
| This measure did not or will not appear on a ballot |
The basic issue is how the state should use the money that regularly flows into its coffers from a tobacco lawsuit. The 2008 initiative earmarked the tobacco settlement funds for particular purposes, such as prevention.
According to Andrist, the 2008 initiative may have been unconstitutional and thus, subject to lawsuits. He thinks the state's voters should re-consider it.[2]
See also
Related measures
North Dakota Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Program Petition (2008)
Articles
References
 |
State of North Dakota Bismarck (capital) |
|---|---|
| Ballot Measures |
List of North Dakota ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process | |
| Government |
North Dakota State Constitution | House of Representatives | Senate | Legislative Council | |
| State executive officers |
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Director of Game and Fish | Commissioner of Labor | Public Service Commission | |
| Judiciary |
North Dakota Supreme Court | Court of Appeals | District Courts | Municipal Courts | Judicial Nominating Commission | Judicial news | |
| Transparency Topics |
Open Records Statute | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations | |
| Divisions |
State |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of Towns |
List of School Districts | |
