Ohio Slot Machines Referendum (2010)

From Ballotpedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Gambling on the Ballot
2009

Ohio Casino Initiative

2008

Alaska Gaming Commission
Arkansas State Lottery Initiative
California Gaming Compacts
Colorado 121
Maine Casino in Oxford
Maryland Casino Measure
Missouri Loss Limits
Ohio Issue 6

200620052004

Contents

The Ohio Slot Machines Referendum may be on the 2010 ballot after the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing the measure on the ballot.[1] Initially the referendum was rejected by Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner's office. The veto referendum called for placing Gov. Ted Strickland's plan for video slot machines on the 2010 ballot The first 3,000 signatures had been gathered prior to the rejection.[2] The governor's plan includes a total of 2,500 video slot machines at 7 race tracks. However, the plan which was added to the state budget is exempted from the referendum process.[3]

During the week of October 6, 2009, the state gave the go-ahead for the group to start collecting signatures for the approved petition. The Attorney General, Richard Cordray, approved the petition language, which now gives the group 90 days to collect the required 241,365 signatures to place the question on the November ballot. The group must submit the petition no later than January 3, 2010.[4]

Lawsuit

On July 20, 2009, the group LetOhioVote.org filed a lawsuit in the Ohio Supreme Court to allow a veto referendum in an effort to block the slots plan from going into effect.[2] LetOhioVote.org won their lawsuit. The Ohio Supreme Court voted 6-1 to allow the veto referendum petition.[5]

Slot machine plan on hold

The state's plan to place a total of 2,500 video slot machines at 7 race tracks has been placed on hold. The announcement comes shortly after Gov. Ted Strickland's approval of suspending tax cuts in an attempt to balance the state budget. The suspended tax cuts are estimated to generate $844 million.[6]

Gov. seeks clarification on authority

On September 30th, 2009, Gov. Strickland announced his plans to put the Slot Machines plan on hold. Strickland is waiting for clarification from The Ohio Supreme Court as to whether he has executive powers to overrule the voters. If he is given those powers, he plans to move ahead with the slot machines plan. [7]

See also

Additional reading

References

Personal tools