Oregon Higher Education Funds, Measure 69 (May 2010)
|Preamble • I • II • III • IV • V • VI • VII • VIII • IX • X • X-A • XI • XI-A • XI-B • XI-C • XI-D • XI-E • XI-F(1) • XI-F(2) • XI-G • XI-H • XI-I(1) • XI-I(2) • XI-J • XI-K • XI-L • XI-M • XI-N • XI-O • XI-P • XII • XIII • XIV • XV • XVI • XVII • XVIII|
The measure proposed authorizing the state to acquire, construct, improve, repair, equip and furnish buildings, structures, land and other projects, or parts thereof, that the legislative assembly determines will benefit higher education institutions or activities.
Text of measure
The ballot title that appeared on the ballot read:
Amends Constitution: Continues and modernizes authority for lowest cost borrowing for community colleges and public universities.
Result of "Yes" Vote: “Yes” vote continues and modernizes state authority to issue lowest cost bonds to finance projects for the benefit of community colleges and public universities.
Result of "No" Vote: “No” vote rejects modernization of authority to issue lowest cost bonds to finance projects for the benefit of community colleges and public universities.
According to the Oregon Secretary of State's office the ballot summary read as follows:
This measure continues and modernizes the state’s authority to use general obligation bonds, the lowest cost method of borrowing, to finance projects for community colleges and public universities. It does not increase the current limit on borrowing. The measure clarifies that community colleges and public universities may purchase existing buildings with the proceeds of general obligation bonds. It also allows the Oregon University System to use nontax revenues to determine whether bonds to be issued under Article XI-F(1) are self-supporting. The measure allows Article XI-F(1) and XI-G bond proceeds to be used for the same parts of a project and to be used for mixed-use projects that benefit higher education. It allows nontax revenues to be used as matching funds for Article XI-G bond proceeds.
According to the financial impact statement that appeared on the ballot there is "no financial effect on either state or local government expenditures or revenues."
Weeks before the May 18 election, Oregon teachers unions announced their support for Measure 68 and 69. Also supporting Measure 69 was the Oregon Attorney General, the Oregon University System, the Oregon Treasurer, the Governor of Oregon and Rep. Chris Harker. In an editorial, Harper said,"...strong public universities contribute to strong businesses."
- Oregon Board of Education and Portland School Board member Bobbie Regan said, "Right now you have certain districts that are very property-tax poor, or you have rural school districts where the possibility of investing and rebuilding schools or adding a wing if they needed to is nearly impossible, because the State really doesn’t provide for any kind of funding to speak of for capital expenditures." Reagan argued that the funds would be extremely helpful to schools and local communities.
- Oregon Community College Association executive director Andrea Henderson said, "It gives colleges greater flexibility to make a decision that's best for the area and its taxpayers." Henderson added,"Legislature has been supportive of capital construction at community colleges lately because of the sharp surge in demand for the schools' roles in the workforce."
- Rep. Chris Harker said, in an editorial that appeared in The Times,"If we want the universities to operate more efficiently and to be more business-like, we need to let them use their limited resources wisely. That means granting them access to low-cost funding and Measure 69 is a tool to do just that."
According to the state campaign finance database, ORESTAR, the main PAC contributing to the campaign was the Safe and Healthy Schools Committee. An account summary for the campaign committee in 2010 can be viewed below.
Note: Safe and Healthy Schools Committee supported both Measures 68 and 69. The summary posted below includes ALL received contributions, expenditures and total cash balance for 2010 for the committee.
|Safe & Healthy Schools Committee 2010 summary|
Below is a chart that outlines major cash contributions to Safe and Healthy Schools Committee:
|Oregon Education Association||$2,500.00||Cash|
|School Employees Exercising Democracy||$2,500.00||Cash|
|School Employees Exercising Democracy||$1,200.00||In-Kind|
|Stand for Children||$1,500.00||Cash|
|American Federation of Teachers-Oregon Issue PAC||$2,400.00||Cash|
Measure 68 did not have an organized opposition. However, in a Oregon Public Broadcasting report Sen. Doug Whitsett said he worried that school districts might make projects too large. Opponents said they worried that Measures 68 and 69 could make the state's financial situation worse than it already was.
According to ORESTAR there was no registered committee in opposition to Measure 69.
Media editorial positions
- Main article: Endorsements of Oregon ballot measures, 2010
- The Oregonian supported Measure 69. "Measure 69, meanwhile, would allow universities access to lower-cost financing to purchase existing buildings. As it stands, the Oregon University System is allowed to use low-cost general obligation bonds to pay only for new facilities, not acquiring existing buildings. In urban settings, such as Portland State University, virtually all expansion involves the purchase of existing buildings. By allowing the higher ed system to use the lowest-cost financing, passage of Measure 69 would save taxpayer dollars."
- Mail Tribune supported Measure 69. "Measure 69 makes a common-sense change in the rules governing how state colleges and universities may pay for expansion...Measure 69 does not increase the amount of debt colleges may incur, and the law still requires the Oregon University System to have enough money in its budget to pay for the bonds...Rising enrollment means colleges and universities need more space. It only makes sense for them to acquire it in the least expensive way possible," said the editorial board.
- The Daily Astorian supported Measure 69. In an editorial the board said,"Ballot measures referred by the Oregon Legislature are the least noticed elements on the May ballot. Measures 68 and 69 are relatively benign constitutional amendments...We recommend a 'yes' vote."
- The Statesman Journal supported Measure 69. In an editorial the board said,"This measure doesn't promote profligate spending. It still requires that a college act conservatively in ensuring it will have the money to repay the debt. General obligation bonds are the least expensive for government to issue, because they are backed by the 'full faith and credit' of the state. Measure 69 could save colleges money in two ways. First, it affirms the use of such lower-cost bonds in these settings. Second, it prevents expensive lawsuits in case someone wants to challenge a decades-long practice in court. Measure 69 deserves a 'yes' vote."
- The Yakima Valley News-Register supported measures 68 and 69. In an editorial, the board said,"Yes on both Measures 68 and 69: Measure 68 would revise the Oregon Constitution to let voters approve local district bonds for an expanded definition of school capital costs, and for the state to use revenue from the sale of the bonds to help pay for local school capital costs. Measure 69 would continue the state’s authority to use general obligation bonds to finance projects for community colleges and public universities. Neither measure has a financial effect on state or local operating expenditures or revenue."
Path to the ballot
According to Section 1, Article XVIII of the Oregon Constitution it took a majority vote of both chambers of the Oregon State Legislature to place the amendment proposed by the legislature on the statewide ballot.
- Oregon's Measures 68 and 69 pass by a landslide
- Oregon's second election of the year is only a day away
- Oregon election nearing, voter pamphlets mailed
- Daily Vanguard,"Measure 69 impacts PSU," May 21, 2010
- Democrat Herald,"Oregon statewide races on primary ballot," May 18, 2010
- The Daily Vanguard,"Bonds on the ballot, deadline next Tuesday," May 11, 2010
- Oregon Daily Emerald,"Primary nears, ballot measures set for vote," May 11, 2010
- Statesman Journal,"Measure 69 would save colleges money," May 11, 2010
- Oregon Public Broadcasting,"Measure 69 Offers Expansion Option For Oregon Universities," May 6, 2010
- KDRV,"A look at State Measures 68 and 69," May 4, 2010
- The Estacada News,"Ballots go out Friday for primary election," April 28, 2010
- KBND,"Money for Education on May Ballot," April 27, 2010
- ↑ The Oregonian,"Voters approve Measures 68 and 69," May 18, 2010
- ↑ Associated Press,"Oregon voters OK ballot measures on school bonds," May 18, 2010
- ↑ The Chronicle,"2 States Approve Measures That Will Benefit Higher Education," May 19, 2010
- ↑ Oregon Legislature,"HJR 101 full text," retrieved March 10, 2010
- ↑ The Dalles Chronicle,"Voters have two statewide measures," April 26, 2010
- ↑ The Oregonian,"Two school, college bonding measures on Oregon's May primary ballot," May 1, 2010
- ↑ The Register-Guard,"Measures address school funding," May 3, 2010
- ↑ Washington Secretary of State: From Our Corner,"Secretary of State Kate Brown Cheers 41 Percent Turnout," retrieved May 20, 2010
- ↑ Washington Secretary of State: From Our Corner,"Frisky Oregonians top 41 percent turnout," May 19, 2010
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 OregonVotes.org,"Measure 69 text," retrieved May 4, 2010
- ↑ Blue Oregon,"Measure 69: Get the Economy Moving Again," March 1, 2010
- ↑ The Oregon Politico,"Teachers unions urge support for education ballot measures," April 30, 2010
- ↑ The Daily Astorian,"Ballot measures seek to lighten financial load on schools," May 5, 2010
- ↑ The Times,"Soapbox: Measure 69 will save money for taxpayers, universities, students," May 6, 2010
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 ORESTAR,"Safe and Healthy Schools Committee PAC information," retrieved May 6, 2010
- ↑ ORESTAR,"Safe and Healthy Schools Committee: Campaign transactions," retrieved May 17, 2010
- ↑ Oregon Public Broadcasting,"Ballot Measure Would Allow State To Provide Schools Capital Project Funds," April 19, 2010
- ↑ The Oregonian,"Election 2010: Yes on Measures 68, 69," April 23, 2010
- ↑ Mail Tribune,"Measures 68 and 69: Yes," April 28, 2010
- ↑ The Daily Astorian,"'Yes' on measures 68 and 69," May 3, 2010
- ↑ Statesman Journal,"Measure 69 would save colleges money," May 11, 2010
- ↑ Statesman Journal,"SJ Editorial Board's endorsements," May 12, 2010
- ↑ News-Register,"Editorial: Ballot measures, state races draw end-of-campaign focus," May 1, 2010
State of Oregon
List of Oregon ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Administrator of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Fish and Wildlife | Commissioner of Labor and Industries | Commissioner of Public Utilities |
Public Records Law | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of Towns |
List of School Districts |