Oregon Increased Signature Requirements for Constitutional Initiative, Measure 79 (May 2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Direct Democracy Measures
Direct democracy.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Ballot Law Update
Oregon Constitution
Flag of Oregon.png

The Oregon Increased Signature Requirements for Constitutional Initiative Amendment, also known as Measure 79, was on the May 16, 2000 ballot in Oregon as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was defeated. The measure would have increased the number of signatures required to place an initiative amending the constitution on the ballot.[1]

Election results

Oregon Measure 79 (May 2000)
Defeatedd No505,08158.59%
Yes 356,912 41.41%

Election results via: Oregon Blue Book

Ballot title

HJR 21 - Amends Constitution: Increases Signatures Required To Place Initiative Amending Constitution On Ballot[2]


[3] Bob Shiprack of the Oregon Building Construction & Trades Council supported the measure, calling the petition process a " growing nuissance." He portrayed initiative campaigns as desperate and unecessary, saying,

"Don't we elect legislators to do this job?
Chief petitioners are circulating petitions and paying companies and individuals to collect signatures for any legal idea they can get a petition for. We find petitioners at the grocery store, coffee shop and any other public venue that might yield an unwitting signature. While none of this is illegal, it is certainly reprehensible.
By increasing the number of signatures needed to verify a ballot by a mere 4%, Oregonians can retake control of their government. Increasing the number of signatures will ensure that at least 12% of recent voting Oregonians have an opportunity to decide what they vote on in the next election."

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Oregon supported the measure for different reasons. They encouraged voters to remember initiatives in the past which discriminated against people and took away basic rights from Oregonians, arguing that measure 79 would force such groups to attain more support before their "divisive measures" were allowed on the ballot.

Many supporters, including the League of Women Voters were concerned with protecting the constitution, aruging that the measure would encourage petitioners to propose changes to statutes instead of the constitution.


[4] The Initiative and Referendum Institute opposed the measure. M. Dane Waters of the institute pointed out the measure's benefits to politicians and infringement on Oregonian's rights:

"The Oregon Constitution is a contract between the people of Oregon and their government, and voters have the right to amend this contract to meet the people's needs. Measure 79 would drastically reduce the number of citizen-initiated amendments that make the ballot, while leaving legislators free to put as many amendments on the ballot as they choose.
Politicians don't put amendments on the ballot that challenge their own power, or challenge the power of the special interests that fund their campaigns. Voters need a mechanism to amend their contract with their government that doesn't depend on career politicians, government employees or lobbyists..."

Ralph Nader publicly opposed the measure, calling it an "attempt to expand legislative power by crippling the citizens' initiative rights."

Most of the opposition considered the measure a way of taking power from the people and giving benefits to the legislature. They also saw a double-standard in the fact that it would put restricitions on citizens trying to amend the constitution but not on the legislature. Many who run initiative campaigns in Oregon tend to go for a constitutional amendment, because unlike statutes, it is harder for the legislature to tamper with the law once it is passed.

See also

Suggest a link

External links


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.