For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Oregon Legislatively Authorized Limits on Damages in Civil Actions, Measure 81 (May 2000)
The Oregon Legislatively Authorized Limits on Damages in Civil Actions Amendment, also known as Measure 81, was on the May 16, 2000 ballot in Oregon as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was defeated. The measure would have allowed the legislature to limit the recovery of damages in civil actions.
|Oregon Measure 81 (May 2000)|
Election results via: Oregon Blue Book
HJR 2 - Amends Constitution: Allows Legislature To Limit Recovery Of Damages In Civil Actions
 Supporters argued that the measure would protect against lawsuit abuse, preventing someone from suing for millions of dollars over a minor offense.
"Over the past three decades, laws have been passed that allow Oregon's working public safety employees to do our jobs without the threat of unlimited lawsuits. When we're on the scene helping people, we know that we can only be held personally liable if we are found to be reckless or negligent. That's fair to us and that's fair to all Oregonians that we serve and protect.
Unless voters pass Measure 81, all existing restraints on damage awards could be eliminated. And, we could be held personally liable. This would force us to pay unlimited financial awards out of our own pockets. A YES vote on Measure 81 will keep reasonable protections from unlimited, unfair and frivolous lawsuits for Oregon's public safety employees."
Many felt the measure would protect people simply doing their jobs and "good samaritans" helping the community without the fear of frivolous lawsuits. Many pointed out that without the passage of Measure 81, liability insurance would increase.
Some others in support of the measure were:
- Oregon Association of Hospitals & Health Systems
- Oregonians Against Lawsuit Abuse
- Oregon Neighborhood Store Association
- Oregon Restaurant Association
- National Federation of Independent Business (Oregon Chapter)
- Oregon Farm Bureau
 Those opposed to the measure argued that it would take away basic rights to acheiving justice. Victims of crime and parents who's children had been victimized strongly opposed the measure.
However, Ralph Nader and The Oregon Consumer League pointed out that the measure is not just about those victims, aruging that the measure will negatively effect everyone:
"It will endanger your constitutional right to jury trial in civil cases, a right fundamental to our democracy. It will allow irresponsible corporations off the hook for the full damage they cause, eliminating their financial incentive to remove dangerous products and practices from the marketplace. It will prevent Oregonians from obtaining just compensation for injuries caused by negligent or reckless corporations."
Others against the measure were:
- Oregon State Council of Senior Citizens
- Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD)
- President of Brain Injury Support Group of Portland
- Alliance for Lung Cancer
- Citizens for Corporate Accountability & Individual Rights
- Oregon 2000 ballot measures
- 2000 ballot measures
- List of Oregon ballot measures
- History of Initiative & Referendum in Oregon
State of Oregon
List of Oregon ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Administrator of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Fish and Wildlife | Commissioner of Labor and Industries | Commissioner of Public Utilities |
|historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.|