Oregon Public School Funding and Equalization, Measure 1 (2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on Education
Education.jpg
Policy
Education policy
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Oregon Constitution
Flag of Oregon.png
Articles
PreambleIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXX-AXIXI-AXI-BXI-CXI-DXI-EXI-F(1)XI-F(2)XI-GXI-HXI-I(1)XI-I(2)XI-JXI-KXI-LXI-MXI-NXI-OXI-PXIIXIIIXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIII

The Oregon Public School Funding and Equalization Amendment, also known as Measure 1, was on the November 7, 2000 ballot in Oregon as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure required the legislature to fund school quality goals adequately, issue reports and establish equalization grants.[1]

Election results

Oregon Measure 1 (2000)
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 940,223 66.32%
No477,46133.68%

Election results via: Oregon Blue Book

Lawsuit based on Measure 1 fails

In Pendleton School District v. State of Oregon, 18 school districts and seven students alleged that Oregon is in violation of the terms of this 2000 ballot measure and sought an injunction directing the Oregon State Legislature to appropriate the funds that the plaintiffs believed were legally required by Measure 1.

A lower state court and then the Oregon Supreme Court ruled against the plaintiffs. The state's high court ruling came in January 2009. Writing for the court, Chief Justice Paul De Muniz said that although the court agreed with the plaintiffs that the legislature had failed to fully fund public schools, the court had concluded that when Oregon voters passed Measure 1, they did not intend for the courts to enforce its funding requirements.[2][3]

Official ballot title

Amends Constitution: Legislature Must Fund School Quality Goals Adequately; Report; Establish Grants[4]

Proponents

John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Stan Bunn, and Ronald E. Timpe

Support

[5] The Oregon School Boards Association supported the measure, saying, "it allows voters to understand where their education dollars are going."They also argued that the measure does not change local control over schools, "Measure 1 simply holds state decision-makers responsible for their funding decisions."

Chief petitioner John Kitzhaber, a physician and Governor of Oregon from 1995-2003[6], said, "The measure was crafted to change the debate about school funding from 'how much to spend?' to 'what education services are we buying?' It does so by requiring the legislature to fund schools so students can reach the high standards set in law. If the legislature fails to do so, its members must detail the effects of their funding decision on the ability of our students to meet standards."

James Sager of the Oregon Education Association supported the measure because it requires that the public gets the whole story of what the state is spending on education and where exactly that money is going.

The Oregon PTA favored the funding the measure provides for schools, and argued that it was unfair for the state to set such high goals for teachers and students without providing adequate monetary support.

Opposition

[7] The Parents Education Association publicly opposed the measure, believing that public funding of schools should actually be decreased. They argued that it is not the government's job to educate children. The self described "family based, biblical" organization also opposes the secular nature in which public schools teach.

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

References


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.