Oregon Top Two Elections, Measure 65 (2008)
Elections and Campaigns
|Not on ballot|
- 1 Election results
- 2 Text of measure
- 3 Background
- 4 Support
- 5 Opposition
- 6 See also
- 7 External links
- 8 Additional reading
- 9 References
If it had passed, it would have brought top two primary elections to voters, where all candidates for an office would compete against each other regardless of party, and the two candidates with the most votes would then advance to the general election. Hence, the initiative was also known as the "top two" initiative.
- Election results from Oregon Secretary of State
Text of measure
The official ballot title for Measure 65 was:
This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
Changes General Election Nomination Processes for Major/Minor Party, Independent Candidates for Most Partisan Offices
The full text of the act proposed by Measure 65 is available here.
|historical ballot measure article requires the text of the measure to be added to the page.|
This initiative's supporters tried unsuccessfully to put a similar measure on the ballot in 2006, and to pass another version through the state legislature in 2008.
Current system and 65's proposals
Prior to 1904, Oregon voters relied on party conventions to nominate their candidates. In 1904, the practice of casting ballots in primaries was instituted.
The reform proposed in Measure 65 was not a Montana-style open primary, but what is known as a Top Two or Louisiana-style "Jungle" Primary.
The statute would have allowed independent voters to vote in the primary elections for US Senator, US Representative, Governor, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Attorney General, state Senator or state Representative, and any other local partisan office. It would not have applied to presidential elections.
Measure 65 was also supported by Associated Oregon Industries, the Oregon Business Association and the Oregon Business Council.
Arguments in favor
Supporters of Measure 65 gave the following reasons for voting "yes":
- It eliminates the fundamental unfairness of having primary elections that exclude non-affiliated voters, and members of minor parties.
- One in four general election legislative races in 2006 were decided with a 70% or more majority.
- The existing election system fails to produce competitive races, so the races are largely decided in primaries that exclude 25% of registered voters.
- Leading proponent Keisling says, "Measure 65 speaks to the heart of an Oregon value. It is an independence of mind and spirit that wants us to vote for the best person and get the best person in office, regardless of party registration."
Supporters of Measure 65 raised $390,329 through late October.
See also: Endorsements of Oregon ballot measures.
Analysis of loss
Leading supporter Phil Keisling did some public opinion research after the November loss. In February 2009, he said that these research indicates that Measure 65's ballot title is at least partly responsible for the loss.
In support of his view, he said that 50% of those polled would have supported Measure 65 if it had been described on the ballot like this:
- "Changes election system for most state offices. All candidates would compete in May primary election. All voters could participate and select candidates regardless of their own, or candidates' party registration. The top two vote getters in each race--again, regardless of party--would then advance to the November election."
instead of the way it was described on the ballot:
- "Changes general election nomination process for major or minor party and independent candidates for most partisan offices."
The Top Two Primary was opposed by the Democratic Party, Libertarian Party, Republican Party, and Pacific Green Party. It was also opposed by the state's four biggest unions, the AFL-CIO, SEIU, AFSCME and the Oregon Education Association.
Arguments made against the measure included:
- Marc Siegel, spokesman for the Democratic Party of Oregon, said, "Open primary is a misnomer. It disqualifies participation more than it opens it."
- Dan Meek of the Independent Party of Oregon believed that Measure 65 would have destroyed minor parties in Oregon, reduced voter choices, confused the ballots, encouraged dirty politicking, prevented fair and democratic endorsements, and not elected moderate candidates anyway.
- The Pacific Green Party of Oregon believed that Measure 65 would have relegated it to rarely appear in the General Election. They based this on Richard Winger's Ballot Access News, where it had been written that 1 in about 1400 previous races had a third party candidate appear in previous elections. Seth Woolley, Secretary of the Pacific Green Party, believed that the Top Two system works to encode the two-party system directly into the election system and cited the fact that Oregon still had Ranked Voting in its Constitution, as a better alternative.
- Oregonians Against Unfair Elections had submitted ballot statements in opposition, including a joint statement against Measure 65 signed by co-chairs of most of the parties in Oregon, including the Democrats, Libertarians, Republicans, and Pacific Greens.
Donors against Measure 65
- ORESTAR Account Summary of Oregonians Against Unfair Elections committee
- ORESTAR overview of Oregonians Against Unfair Elections committee
OEA implies Measure 65 backed by Sizemore
The Oregon Education Association was opposed to Measure 65. In late October, the group sent a mailing to its members that appeared to assert that Measure 65 was associated with Bill Sizemore. Supporters of Measure 65 responded immediately, saying, "The ad, paid for by the OEA and brought to our attention by an outraged teacher, claims Bill Sizemore is the author and lead proponent of the Open Primary/Measure 65.... Linking us to Sizemore is blatantly false, cynical, and offensive. I can’t believe OEA’s political bosses are so afraid of losing power that they would knowingly lie and mislead their own members."
Sen. Rick Metsger, D-Welches, said, "There are plenty of things the OEA could say that would be legitimate. They don't have to stoop to lying. How do you have any credibility if you have to win that way? It gets me down that we're stooping to the same things we decried in the Newt Gingrich era."
- 2008 General Election Measures: Voter Guide
- 2008 Election Results
- FairVote on the Louisiana Primary
- Southern Crown Blog on Louisiana Primary in Mississippi Context
- Extensive History of Washington's Primary related to the Louisiana Primary
- Information on this Ballot Measure from the Oregon Secretary of State (note, the site is poorly designed; scroll to the bottom to navigate the various pages about Measure 65). Earlier information on the Initiative Petition
- Official Yes on 65 site
- One Ballot (Vote Yes 65 proponent)
- Oregon Ballot Freedom Project
- OregonLive.com: "Reviving Oregon Elections" by Phil Keisling, April 13, 2008
- A well-reasoned argument 'for' (see also 'oppose' comment by Hawkwood)
- Ballot Measure 65 would be good for Oregon
- Blue Oregon: "Top-two primary: So much for THAT argument," August 20, 2008
- Why Top Two is Unsound, also Court challenges, at nwprogressives.org
- Save Oregon's Democracy (opposition)
- Oregonians Against Unfair Elections (opposition)
- City Hall,"On Unreleased 2008 WFO Tax Returns, $60k Grant Reported As Coming From Progressive America Fund," December 16, 2009
- "Open Primaries in Oregon?" from BlueOregon.com
- OregonLive.com: "Two more initiatives qualify for Ore. ballot," The Oregonian, July 21, 2008
- Oregon Blue Book website, accessed December 12, 2013
- Statesman-Journal, "Measure 65 would alter Oregon's primary election system significantly," October 16, 2008
- Pacific Green Party Secretary Seth Woolley's Blog Top Two is Not an Open Primary
- Portland Business Journal, "Donors kick in $14 million for Oregon ballot initiatives," October 24, 2008
- Willamette Week, "Measure 65: Open Primaries; Vote Yes"
- Oregonian, "Keisling autopsies his "top two" primary corpse," February 20, 2009
- "Independent's Way" from Willamette Week
- Dan Meek, Measure 65 will Destroy Minor Parties, Choices, Oregon Catalyst Website
- Ballot Access News
- Pacific Green Party Secretary Seth Woolley's Blog, Washington State Top Two Results
- Pacific Green Party Secretary Seth Woolley's Blog, Measure 65 Talking Points for OPB
- Oregonian, "Dark Lords and Dark Politics"
- Willamette Week, "Keisling and Paulus Attack Teachers Union Mailer Tying Measure 65 to Sizemore," October 23, 2008
- The Oregonian, "The OEA shows its true colors"
- The Oregonian," "The OEA: Playing Guilt by Association?"
State of Oregon
List of Oregon ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | History of direct democracy | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process |
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Administrator of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Director of Fish and Wildlife | Commissioner of Labor and Industries | Commissioner of Public Utilities |