Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District parcel tax, Measure V (June 2009)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A Palos Verdes Peninsula School District parcel tax, Measure V ballot question was on the June 23, 2009 ballot for voters in the Palos Verdes Peninsula School District in Los Angeles County, where it was approved.[1]

Measure V asked voters to approve a four-year parcel tax. The tax is $165 per parcel, levied on top of the district's existing $209 parcel tax. It was expected to generate an estimated $3.3 million a year over the four years it will be in effect.[2]

Election results

Measure V
Approveda Yes 12,301 68.89%
These final election results are from the Los Angeles County election office.


Measure V had the support of the council of parent-teacher associations, the teachers union, the chamber of commerce and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Board of Realtors. The campaign spent about $100,000 to urge a "yes" vote on Measure V.[2]


Craig Huey, the author of LAVoterGuide, recommended a "no" vote on Measure V. He gave seven reasons for this recommendation:

  • Most of the cuts are overdue and will actually help eliminate the existing fat and unnecessary spending.
  • Property values will not be affected with either a "Yes" or "No" vote. PV educational excellence will not be compromised, the kids will continue to excel and students won't suffer any decline in receiving among the best educational opportunities in Los Angeles County.
  • In a recession, you don't raise taxes, you cut spending. Raising taxes at this time is unwise.
  • Measure V would be a tax on a tax. If Measure V passes, taxpayers will be paying M and V at the same time because Measure P lasts until 2012 - plus all the bond money payments.
  • There are no meaningful teachers union concessions; everyone else must sacrifice. Until the union becomes more flexible, I don't think more money should be spent by the taxpayers.
  • School expenditures in 1999-2000 were $53,602,064 with 10,072 students. School expenditures in 2008-2009 are $99,145,300 (up from $98,154,883 from last year) with about 11,900 students. That's a 30 percent increase over 10 years.
  • Many of the inequities are beyond the control of any school board or educational leadership.[3]

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Measure V: "To protect the high quality of education in Palos Verdes schools, prevent deep cuts to educational programs including math, science, technology, PE, music and art; retain qualified teachers/school employees; keep school facilities well-maintained; and continue programs that promote student achievement and success in college/careers; shall Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District levy $165 per parcel for four years only, with independent citizen oversight, an exemption for senior citizens, and all money staying locally to benefit our schools?"[4]

See also

External links

Suggest a link