Rules and Operations of the Senate Committee, North Carolina State Senate

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
North Carolina State Senate
SLP badge.png
Senate Committees

Agriculture/Environment/Natural Resources
Appropriations/Base Budget
Committee of the Whole Senate
CommerceEducation/Higher Education
FinanceHealth Care
Insurance Committee
Judiciary IJudiciary II
Pensions & Retirement & Aging
Program Evaluation
Rules and Operations of the Senate
State and Local Government
TransportationWays & Means

House Committees

The Rules and Operations of the Senate Committee is a standing committee of the North Carolina State Senate.

Per Section 31 of the Senate Rules, committees of the North Carolina State Senate are assigned by the President Pro Tempore. The rules do not specify when or how often committees are assigned. The President Pro Tempore shall have the right and the authority to appoint the chair and vice-chair of each standing committee.[1] The President Pro Tempore and the Deputy President Pro Tempore shall serve as ex officio members of each standing committee and subcommittee.[2]

DocumentIcon.jpg See rules: Senate Resolution 1

Committee members

2013-2014

Rules and Operations of the Senate Committee Members, 2013
Democratic members (5)Republican members (11)
Daniel Blue, Jr.Tom Apodaca, Chair
Ben ClarkPeter S. Brunstetter, Vice-chair
Clark JenkinsChad Barefoot
Martin L. Nesbitt, Jr.Andrew C. Brock
Josh SteinHarry Brown
Kathy Harrington
Ralph Hise
Brent Jackson
Wesley Meredith
E. S. (Buck) Newton
Bill Rabon

2011 Session

Issues

Voting Rights Bill

Committee Chair Tom Apodaca moved an "omnibus voting rights bill" to the North Carolina State Senate. Included in the bill were the removal of the state's early voting period, Sunday voting, and same-day registration provisions. Some critics of the bill said it will hurt Democrats, who cast nearly 50% more early voting ballots than Republicans in 2012, and African-Americans, who accounted for almost 30% of all early voting in 2012. Apodaca, however, stated his belief that the law would improve the integrity of the voting process. Because of the Supreme Court's action on the Voting Rights Ac, the state would not require U.S. Department of Justice approval before the bill is signed into law.[3][4]

External links

References