2013 Convention Preview: Virginia's GOP delegates to choose nominees for lt. gov and AG this weekend!
South Carolina Rainy Day Fund Amendment, Amendment 3 (2010)
| South Carolina Constitution |
|---|
| Articles |
| Preamble • I • II • III • IV • V • VI • VII • VIII • VIII-A • IX • X • XI • XII • XIII • XIV • XV • XVI • XVII |
Contents |
Election results
- See also: 2010 ballot measure election results
Official election results of the measure follow:
| Amendment 3 (Rainy Day Fund) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| 890,015 | 70.91% | |||
| No | 365,105 | 29.09% | ||
Official results via the South Carolina State Election Commission.
Text of amendment
Ballot title
The ballot title of the measure read as follows:[2]
- Must Section 36(A), Article III of the Constitution of this State be amended so as to increase from three to five percent in increments of one-half of one percent over four fiscal years the amount of state general fund revenue in the latest completed fiscal year required to be held in the General Reserve Fund?[3]
- Explanation:
- A ‘Yes' vote will increase the amount of money state government must keep in the General Reserve Fund (its "rainy day" fund) from 3% of the previous year's revenue to 5% of the previous year's revenue.
- Yes []
- No []
Constitutional changes
The measure was proposed to amend Article III, Section 36 of the South Carolina Constitution.[3]
Support
Supporters
- The South Carolina Republican Party supported the amendment. [4]
Opposition
There was no known campaign in opposition of the measure.
Media endorsements
Supporters
- The Post and Courier was in favor of the measure, arguing, "Voters should approve Amendment 3 "to increase from three to five percent in increments of one-half of one percent over four fiscal years the amount of state general fund revenue in the latest completed fiscal year required to be held in the General Reserve Fund."[5]
- The Spartanburg Herald Journal urged voters to vote 'yes' on the measure, writing in an editorial, "South Carolina lawmakers have never shown fiscal restraint; it must be imposed on them. The enhanced reserves would cushion the blow of mid-year budget cuts if state revenues fall short."[6]
Path to the ballot
Section 1 of Article XVI of the South Carolina Constitution says that a legislatively-referred amendment can go on the ballot if approved by a 2/3rds vote of each house of the South Carolina State Legislature. (If the state's voters approved the amendment, it must then go back to the legislature for a second affirmative vote.)
See also
Articles
Additional reading
- South Carolina proposed constitutional amendments on the 2010 ballot
- Four amendments to appear on November ballot
- Understand constitutional ballot questions
References
- ↑ The Augusta Chronicle, "S.C. ballot measure asks about protecting hunting", July 28, 2010
- ↑ South Carolina State Election Commission, "2010 Constitutional Amendment Questions", Retrieved August 31, 2010
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 South Carolina State Elections Commission, "2010 Constitutional Amendments"
- ↑ How You Should Vote On The Constitutional Amendments, "South Carolina GOP"
- ↑ The Post and Courier, "Vote 'Yes' on amendments", October 25, 2010
- ↑ Go Upstate.com, "Vote yes to four constitutional ballot questions", October 27, 2010
State of South Carolina Columbia (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Ballot Measures |
List of South Carolina ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Campaign Finance Requirements | |
| Government |
South Carolina State Constitution | House of Representatives | Senate | Legislative Council | Ethics Commission | Legislative Audit Council Director | |
| State executive officers |
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Comptroller General | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Education | Director of Insurance | Commissioner of Agriculture | Director of Natural Resources | Director of Labor, Licensing and Regulation | Chairman of Public Service Commission | |
| Judiciary |
South Carolina Supreme Court | Court of Appeals | Judicial selection process | Judicial news | Judicial activist organizations | |
| Transparency Topics |
Freedom of Information Act | Transparency Checklist | Government corruption reports | Transparency Legislation | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations | |
| Divisions |
State |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of Towns |
List of School Districts | |