State legislatures compared by extent of electoral competitiveness in 2010
From Ballotpedia
This chart captures the ranking that a state legislature received on all three factors in this Election Competitiveness Index.
- The first column, "Primary Contests," ranks states against each other based on the percentage of incumbents who had a primary challenger.
- The second column, "Major Party Competition," ranks states against each other based on the percentage of major party candidates on the November 2 ballot with a major party challenger.
- The third column, "Open Seats," contrasts states based on the percentage of incumbents who ran for re-election in 2010.
- The fourth column is an arithmetical average of the state's scores on the all three factors.
States compared by electoral competitiveness
Note on ranking system: In each case, 1 represents the most electorally competitive environment, and 46 represents the least electorally competitive environment. (46 is the highest relevant number in 2010, because there are state legislative elections in 46 states in 2010.)
| State legislature | Primary contests | Major party competition | Open seats | Overall rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 9 | 41 | 21 | 22 |
| Alaska | 23 | 30 | 34 | 31 |
| Arizona | 5 | 16 | 4 | 3 |
| Arkansas | 41 | 44 | 3 | 33 |
| California | 37 | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| Colorado | 45 | 10 | 12 | 21 |
| Connecticut | 44 | 14 | 33 | 36 |
| Delaware | 35 | 32 | 35 | 44 |
| Florida | 19 | 37 | 9 | 17 |
| Georgia | 16 | 43 | 19 | 28 |
| Hawaii | 6 | 7 | 31 | 6 |
| Idaho | 10 | 36 | 40 | 30 |
| Illinois | 25 | 28 | 43 | 39 |
| Indiana | 26 | 26 | 42 | 37 |
| Iowa | 39 | 22 | 22 | 29 |
| Kansas | 18 | 33 | 42 | 34 |
| Kentucky | 21 | 35 | 44 | 43 |
| Maine | 43 | 2 | 13 | 14 |
| Maryland | 2 | 15 | 23 | 5 |
| Massachusetts | 38 | 39 | 20 | 40 |
| Michigan | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Minnesota | 42 | 4 | 27 | 24 |
| Missouri | 28 | 34 | 5 | 20 |
| Montana | 30 | 18 | 6 | 12 |
| Nebraska | 3 | 20 | 24 | 7 |
| Nevada | 20 | 8 | 2 | 4 |
| New Hampshire | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
| New Mexico | 15 | 38 | 46 | 42 |
| New York | 17 | 12 | 28 | 13 |
| North Carolina | 11 | 23 | 32 | 19 |
| North Dakota | 46 | 13 | 14 | 25 |
| Ohio | 27 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Oklahoma | 29 | 40 | 18 | 32 |
| Oregon | 32 | 5 | 37 | 27 |
| Pennsylvania | 31 | 29 | 35 | 38 |
| Rhode Island | 7 | 24 | 29 | 15 |
| South Carolina | 14 | 46 | 38 | 41 |
| South Dakota | 36 | 21 | 8 | 18 |
| Tennessee | 34 | 31 | 40 | 45 |
| Texas | 22 | 42 | 45 | 46 |
| Utah | 8 | 11 | 30 | 10 |
| Vermont | 40 | 27 | 25 | 35 |
| Washington | 33 | 25 | 17 | 26 |
| West Virginia | 4 | 17 | 26 | 9 |
| Wisconsin | 24 | 19 | 16 | 16 |
| Wyoming | 12 | 45 | 15 | 23 |
See also
- State legislative elections, 2010
- Impact of term limits on state legislative elections in 2010
- Partisan balance of legislatures and 2010 competitiveness
- Major party candidates with no major party challengers in the November 2010 state legislative elections
- Open seats in the 2010 state legislative elections
| ||||||||||||||||