Texas Veterans Hospitals, Proposition 8 (2009)
The state was already in partnership with the federal government in the maintenance of seven veterans' home facilities. Cities in the state in which these facilities are located are:
- Big Spring
- El Paso
Senator Juan Hinojosa sponsored the bill that would have the state government pay for the construction of veterans hospitals, while the U.S. Veterans Administration would pay for operating and maintenance expenses. The amendment was authored by Representatives Ismael Flores, David McQuade Leibowitz, Ryan Guillen and Armando Martinez.
Senator Juan Hinojosa, sponsor of the measure, thanked his supporters and voters who voted for the amendment on November 4, 2009. According to the senator: "It is our duty to provide military veterans with the medical care they deserve."
|Texas Proposition 8 (2009)|
Election results via: Legislative Reference Library of Texas
Text of measure
|“||The constitutional amendment authorizing the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans hospitals in this state.||”|
The full text of the measure can be read here.
- See also: Amending the Texas Constitution
|The state may contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans hospitals in this state.|
- Proponents of the measure stated that if it is passed, it would allow voters to have a say whether or not the state could contribute to a federal initiative.
- Supporters also said that the state already contributes to federal government projects, such as seven veterans’ home facilities. A “yes” vote would pave the way for another hospital that would further address the needs of state veterans.
According to an article published on September 26, 2009:
“The state’s 120,000 veterans, including those who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, would benefit through proposals to encourage the building of more veterans hospitals in Texas and to continue a state program that provides them low-interest loans to buy land and houses.”
|“||With Proposition 8, Texans can make sure that our military veterans receive what they deserve. Proposition 8 would give the state government authority to contribute funding to the nine in-patient veterans hospitals that serve more than 1.7 million veterans in Texas. By allowing state funds to be combined with federal funds, veterans' services and facilities could expand and improve.||”|
In a commentary published by the Austin American-Statesman, Senator Eddie Lucio stated his support for Proposition 8:
- It is important to provide adequate health care to veterans in the state. Lucio states that the measure, if enacted, would tend to the many veterans out of the 100,000 that reside in the state that need specialized care that only a veterans hospital could give.
- Lucio cites the example of the Audie Murphy Veterans Hospital in San Antonio that offers similar services. He claims that due to the size of the state, many cannot travel to this facility, as the trip is physically draining, and may be too expensive.
- Lucio states: “Proposition 8 would encourage the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to partner with state and local communities to establish additional facilities.”
During the week of October 26, 2009 about 50 veterans ranging from various wars, gathered in Brownsville, Texas to start a two day auto caravan across South Texas in support of Proposition 8:
- According to state Rep. Ismael Flores, when talking about veterans and their hopes for amendment passage: “We've always had to struggle. I watched them organize, I watched them march, I watched them fight, I watched them go before different agencies, to no avail.”
- With signs of "Vote for Proposition 8" on their vehicles, the group planned to travel from Brownsville to as far as Roma, Texas.
- The caravan was organized due to notoriously low turnout for amendment elections.
No committees or contributions to campaigns in favor of Proposition 8 were reported.
According to a review of the state’s proposed constitutional amendments by the Lake County Sun:
- Opponents of the proposition said that the amendment was not likely to bring new veterans hospitals to Texas anytime soon.
- Logic, according to opponents, pointed to expectations of the state government funding future facilities in the aftermath of this amendment. The federal government funded the construction of such facilities, and the passage of Proposition 8 would have altered that.
- Opponents believed it was unnecessary for the state to contribute money, property and other resources.
The National Taxpayers Union was opposed to Proposition 8 because they argued that this proposal could potentially increase tax burdens on Texans. This measure was included in NTU's 2009 General Election Ballot Guide.
No committees or contributions to campaigns in opposition to Proposition 8 were reported.
Media editorial positions
- Main article: Endorsements of Texas ballot measures, 2009
- The Austin Chronicle said, "We frankly can't believe it takes a constitutional amendment to get this done, and even the sponsors weren't sure."
- The El Paso Times said, "This would allow state resources to be used to support veterans hospitals in Texas, which has nine in-patient facilities that serve more than 1.5 million veterans. Even though the hospitals are federally funded, state resources could be used to enhance and improve the facilities. Our veterans deserve this."
- The Star-Telegram said,"A lot of people in the Rio Grande Valley want a federal veterans hospital in their area. There are nine such hospitals in Texas, but none in the Valley. Prop 8 says it would be OK for the state to contribute money, property or other resources to help build and operate VA hospitals. But the Legislature also passed a law to do the same thing whether Prop 8 is approved or not. Doesn’t that make Prop 8 unnecessary?"
Path to the ballot
- See also: Laws governing direct democracy in Texas
As laid out in Article 17 of the Texas Constitution, in order for a proposed constitutional amendment to be placed on the ballot, the Texas State Legislature must propose the amendment in a joint resolution of both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives. The joint resolution can originate in either the House or the Senate. The resolution must be adopted by a vote of at least two-thirds of the membership of each house of the legislature. That amounts to a minimum of 100 votes in the House of Representatives and 21 votes in the Senate.
- Texas 2009 ballot measures
- 2009 ballot measures
- List of Texas ballot measures
- History of direct democracy in Texas
- KGNS-TV, "Eleven proposed constitutional amendments before Texas voters this November," October 19, 2009
- The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, "Key items on ballot for Texans," October 18, 2009
- Legislative Reference Library of Texas, "Constitutional amendment election dates," accessed January 20, 2015
- Texas Legislative Council, "Amendments to the Texas Constitution Since 1876," accessed January 20, 2015
- Edinburg Politics, "Disabled veterans’ home property tax breaks, Valley VA Hospital plan, posting big victories in Legislature," June 2, 2009
- Senator Juan Hinojosa, "Texas Voters Approve Both of Hinojosa's Constitutional Amendments," November 4, 2009
- Texas Secretary of State, "Official Ballot Language and Order for the Nov.3, 2009 Constitutional Amendment Election," July 28, 2009
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Texas Legislature Online, "Enrolled Version of HJR 7," accessed January 20, 2015
- Fort Worth Star-Telegram, "Texans to vote on proposed constitutional amendments," September 26, 2009 (dead link)
- Burnt Orange Report, "Early Voting on Constitutional Amendments Ends Tomorrow," October 29, 2009
- Austin American-Statesman, "Lucio: Voters can allow state to expand care for veterans," October 13, 2009
- San Antonio Express-News, "Valley veterans hopeful for Proposition 8," October 26, 2009
- Follow the Money, Proposition 8
- Lake County Sun, "Propositions 5 through 8," October 1, 2009
- The Austin Chronicle, "The Austin Chronicle' Endorsements," October 16, 2009
- El Paso Times, "Propositions: Appraisal reform on November ballot," October 18, 2009
- Star-Telegram, "Nov. 3 election recommendations," October 16, 2009 (dead link)
|historical ballot measure article requires that the text of the measure be added to the page.|