User talk:Josh Altic

From Ballotpedia
(Redirected from User talk:JoshA)
Jump to: navigation, search


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Josh Altic, welcome to Ballotpedia!

We're glad you're here. Here's how to get started:

1. Watch Ballotpedia's 5-minute overview.
2. Learn more about how you can contribute to our monthly projects.
April's Project of the Month

Missouri-Stipend Scandal.jpg
The St. Joseph School District, the 16th-largest school district in Missouri, has been plagued by a stipend scandal. Ballotpedia first exposed the depth of corruption over a year ago, and provided thorough coverage as the story unraveled.

Watch the video below for an in-depth run-down on the St. Joseph School District scandal.

Brittany Clingen reports on the scandal in the St. Joseph School District.
Help.png Have a question? More to add? Is your school district this corrupt? Contact us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

3. Find an article you'd like to improve.
4. Start editing!

You can also view tutorials on editing, or contact us.

Welcome to our community! -- Ballotpedia editor


-- 12:20, 8 August 2012 (CDT)

Hi Josh! Welcome to Ballotpedia. BaileyL 12:20, 17 August 2012 (CDT)


RupertClayton wrote:

Hi Josh. Thanks for your comprehensive coverage of the measures on the ballot in San Francisco in November. I notice that for Props H and I you state that: "If both this measure and the competing initiative are approved, the one with the most votes will be enacted, while the other is rejected."

My understanding is that the poison pill provision of Section 2 of Prop I, combined with its much more expansive scope, means that even if Prop H gets more votes than Prop I, Prop I's restrictions on voters' ability to challenge future projects will still take effect, even though the city will need to keep artificial turf and night-lighting out of the western end of Golden Gate Park.

I have been involved with the campaign for Prop H and against Prop I, so making this change myself would be a conflict of interest. Is that something you'd be willing to update?

Thanks!


RupertClayton wrote:
Thanks for the quick response, and for the work you have put into coverage of these measures.
This discussion page has been protected from further postings.