Election night question
-- 11:00, 4 September 2013 (CDT)
Please see Talk:Mike Enzi. The Advocate was in error. I fixed the sections in both the Vitter and Enzi articles, and you restored the incorrect version without even contacting me for discussion. If you google the key phrase, you will see that every other website which originally copied that has now corrected it. I expect you to do the same. This is an encyclopedia. TomJx 16:24, 20 October 2013 (CDT)
- As I said, there's a difference between keeping the original insurance plan (what The Advocate stated) and keeping a subsidy (what the bill and Vitter's own press release stated). That's why those sources originally using The Advocate's phrasing of "optional for lawmakers and their employees to continue receiving the subsidized premium health benefits plans just like most large businesses" later corrected their statements. I am satisfied with your corrections to the Enzi and Vitter articles, even if you want to pretend I made some totally different 'misinterpretation'. Anyone who googles for 'stop congress exempt' or similar can see the wild claims of the "conservative" groups and press. You may claim the National Review is a "bias source" (sic), but when even it feels the need to publicly debunk such claims.... TomJx 02:54, 24 October 2013 (CDT)
|GuyB121 wrote:||On 11:18, 3 January 2014|
The reason I removed the tags on the Maine and Ohio Marijuana pages is to stop them appearing on the page "marijuana on the ballot" which only lists actual (as in not proposed) ballot measures.If there is another way to remove it from this page without removing the tags please do so
|Reply to GuyB121|
|Loretta Lax Miller wrote:||On 17:21, 20 January 2014|
|Now what is the problem with me placing my name on the ballot|
|Reply to Loretta Lax Miller|
|James Egnor-Keil wrote:||On 04:21, 28 January 2014|
|Thank you for helping out with the Desmond Thorsson page. I just started Ballotpedia today, so there was sure to be a thing or two I missed or messed.|
|Reply to James Egnor-Keil|
|TomJx wrote:||On 08:41, 25 February 2014|
3/8/2013 filing as the Senate Majority PAC
3/9/2011 filing as Majority PAC6/11/2010 filing as Commonsense Ten
|Reply to TomJx|
|Rememberraul wrote:||On 22:29, 5 March 2014|
I am not great at these. I just left an new edit that does not allude to Jones current candidacy but does have this citation from a Los Angeles magazine. Can you look at it and help me get it right? Thanks!
Originally published by New Times Los Angeles December 21, 2000http://www.slashdocs.com/ixuqpw/brained-raul-lopez-scientology-story.html (timed out)
|Reply to Rememberraul|
|Rememberraul wrote:||On 19:06, 7 March 2014|
He is running again. Did here is his website.http://www.votebrentjones.com/
|Reply to Rememberraul|
|Campaignguy wrote:||On 10:18, 1 April 2014|
Sorry I did not see that policy before. Thank you. I will make certain to note my interests in the future.Thank you for the formatting changes. I look forward to making future contributions.
|Reply to Campaignguy|
|VigilantCitizen wrote:||On 05:24, 27 April 2014|
|Hi, regarding the updates to the "Calen Fretts" page, he is not running again in 2014. The website update on 3/18 was just to update the link to the archived campaign site from 2012, and you can see that the site still says 2012.|
|Reply to VigilantCitizen|
|Regroce wrote:||On 03:09, 3 June 2014|
I keep receiving messages that my entries are blocked because, according to the notice, my IP address was used by another person who's been blocked for posting vandalism/spam.
The IP address cited in the message is *not* my IP address, however, and which I can verify.Can this block against my contributions be removed? I'd be happy to offer my actual IP address, along with source, if needed.
|Reply to Regroce|
|Travis Mitchell wrote:||On 02:29, 25 June 2014|
Hi, you asked if I have a written reference to Bryan Lentz having three children. No, I do not. However, I saw them the other day, and there were definitely three.
Should I have refrained from correcting an entry such as this when I have only eyewitness knowledge?
|Reply to Travis Mitchell|
|Jennifer Waggoner wrote:||On 01:27, 10 September 2014|
I got a message that I was blocked because someone was spamming external links from my IP, but I have a static IP and I don't understand why I can't post. Help!
|Reply to Jennifer Waggoner|
|Cubswin wrote:||On 19:32, 16 September 2014|
|For someone reason my ip is blocked by you. Was trying to fix the MD-1 race page. Andy Harris is running against Bill Tilghman in the general. It incorrectly states he's running against John Laferla who lost the primary to Tilghman.|
|Reply to Cubswin|
|Phillip Ung wrote:||On 16:15, 21 October 2014|
Hi Kaitlin,Wondering why you removed the Police Chief's support from the support list on Yes on Proposition 2 in California. The link I provided was to the press release sent out by the Association. What other verification is required?
|Reply to Phillip Ung|
|Aldric Ulep wrote:||On 08:30, 17 December 2014|
|Thanks for the note KaitlinE. Glad to help and I hope to keep supporting Ballotpedia!|
|Reply to Aldric Ulep|
|Willywill3x wrote:||On 17:12, 18 January 2015|
|It seems my user name was blocked? I'm not sure who this user VerenaBosanquet is or how they used my ip address to spam other pages. I would like my willywill3x account to be reinstated so I may make the adjustments to my page "David Earl Williams III" (replacing the old campaign website url with the updated one) I also emailed you at your personal email address on this matter.|
|Reply to Willywill3x|