Alaska Constitutional Convention Question, Ballot Measure 1 (2012)
|Constitutional Convention Question|
|Type:||Automatic ballot referral|
|Status:||On the ballot|
The measure would create a convention to revise, alter or amend the state constitution. The last time a constitutional convention question was on the ballot in the state was in 2002. That measure was defeated.
Text of the measure
The following is the ballot language that will appear before voters:
|“||Shall there be a constitutional convention?||”|
Legislative Affairs Agency summary
This question relates to a call for a constitutional convention. At the convention the state constitution may be amended or revised, subject to approval by the voters. Under the state constitution, the voters must have the chance to vote on the question of whether there should be a constitutional convention if there has not been a convention during the last ten years. There has not been a convention in the last ten years. This question asks voters to say whether there should be a constitutional convention.
The following are excerpts of the statement of support that was submitted for the State of Alaska Official Voter Pamphlet:
- "The risks of corruption in government have risen. You know the examples. The attorney general may be conflicted or preoccupied. A constitutional amendment can create a quasi-judicial office of Inspector General with the duties of overseeing ethical performance of government, election management, redistricting and other duties, which do not easily fit under executive control. Your permanent fund dividend is not in the constitution. It needs protection as politicians may seek other uses for the money and sustainable standards for its size. The fund itself has no stated purpose. A convention can define the “rainy day” that allows legislative expenditures. Standards for the use of its income can be set. Part of its income can be committed to expand the existing constitutional right to K-12 education to include a preschool year with participation by private institutions."
- "People fear that extremists of the left or right will take over a convention, but for a convention, people of stature will come forward who were not prepared to give their lives to legislative representation. You get to choose the delegates and you get to vote on the convention product, probably a series of amendments, before any change is adopted. The Alaskan democracy and the Alaskan way of life are in danger. A convention is a risk worth taking."
Note: The statement of opposition was written by John Havelock, former Attorney General.
Path to the ballot
- 2012 ballot measures
- Alaska 2012 ballot measures
- List of Alaska ballot measures
- Alaska Legislature
- Constitutional convention questions on the Alaska ballot
- Alaska Elections, "Ballot Measures Appearing on the General Election Ballot", Retrieved April 3, 2012
- Alaska Elections, "Ballot Measures Appearing on the General Election Ballot", Retrieved October 4, 2012
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- Alaska Elections, "State of Alaska Official Voter Pamphlet", Retrieved October 18, 2012