Americans for Limited Government

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 15:54, 2 January 2014 by SarahR (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search



Americans for Limited Government
Americans for Limited Government.JPG
President:Bill Wilson
Chairman:Howard Rich
Website:http://getliberty.org/
Portal:Congress
Features of Congress

Background
Federal Election CommissionDemocratic Congressional Campaign CommitteeNational Republican Congressional CommitteeFiling requirements for congressional candidatesClasses of United States SenatorsFilling vacancies in the U.S. SenatePresident Pro Tempore of the SenateUnited States Speaker of the HouseFilibuster

Sessions
113th Congress112th Congress111th Congress110th Congress

Analysis
Lifetime voting recordsNet worth of United States Senators and RepresentativesStaff salaries of United States Senators and RepresentativesNational Journal vote ratings
Americans for Limited Government (ALG) is a national libertarian political advocacy organization headquartered in Virginia. The group has had high-profile involvement in a number of ballot initiative campaigns, especially in 2006. The issues the group supports are eminent domain reform, property rights, tax and spending reform, school choice, judicial reform and government accountability.

Leadership

2012 elections

According to OpenSecrets.org, Americans for Limited Government spent $2,588,500 in the 2012 election cycle.[1]

Endorsed candidates

In the 2012 election cycle, the Americans for Limited Government supported the following candidates:[1]

Expenditures

Top 5 largest Americans for Limited Government expenditures in 2012[2]
Candidate Party State Office For Against Total Desired Result
Jeff Duncan Republican Party SC House $2,500 $0 $2,500
Yes.png
Matt Salmon Republican Party AZ House $2,500 $0 $2,500
Yes.png
David Schweikert Republican Party AZ House $2,500 $0 $2,500
Yes.png
Scott Keadle Republican Party NC House $2,500 $0 $2,500
No.png
Mitt Romney Republican Party N/A President $1,750 $0 $1,750
No.png

Issues

Property Rights

In 2006, ALG helped fund ballot initiatives to curtail the expanded scope of eminent domain created by the US Supreme Court's Kelo v. New London decision in 2005. Some of these measures would also have required governments to either waive restrictions or compensate land owners when land use and environmental laws decreased the value of parcels of property. These initiatives were known as "Kelo-Plus" to indicate that they included a provision to reform regulatory takings policy, in addition to reforming eminent domain abuses.

Oregon Ballot Measure 37, approved by voters in Oregon in 2004, was a regulatory takings reform initiative. Encouraged by this success, and piggybacking on the public backlash from the Supreme Court's 2005 Kelo v. City of New London decision, ALG supported "Kelo-Plus" ballot initiatives in 2006 in Arizona, California, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, and Oklahoma.

ALG also supported I-933 in Washington, which was a pure takings initiative.

The Missouri and Oklahoma petition drives did not collect sufficient signatures, and the Montana initiative was removed from the ballot by a circuit judge who found that signature collection fraud had occurred.

The Nevada Supreme Court, on single-subject grounds, removed the regulatory takings component of the ALG-sponsored Kelo-Plus initiative, leaving intact the measure's Kelo-reform provision.

Of the three states (Arizona, California, Idaho) where Kelo-Plus ballot initiatives appeared on the ballot in 2006, the measure passed in only Arizona.

Washington voters declined to pass I-933, that state's takings reform proposal.

Taxpayer Bill of Rights

ALG also supports initiatives to enact Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) laws, which put a cap on how fast a state's spending can grow. The specific cap is based on an index that is a combination of inflation and population growth, sometimes known as a "popu-flation" index. These laws provide for "rainy day" (emergency) funds as well as the ability for state voters to decide whether their representatives should spend revenue surpluses rather than have it refunded to the taxpayers. Colorado voters passed the best-known example of a TABOR law in 1992 and later voted to temporarily suspend it via the 2005 Colorado Economic Recovery Act.[3]

In 2006, ALG assisted in successful efforts to place TABOR ballot initiatives on ballots in Maine, Nebraska and Oregon. All three measures were rejected.

In 2006, ALG also assisted in ultimately unsuccessful attempts to qualify TABOR initiatives for ballots in Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada and Oklahoma. The Michigan and Missouri efforts were unsuccessful on the grounds that insufficient numbers of signatures were collected in the petition drives. In Montana, after the measure had been certified by the ballot by the Secretary of State, a private coalition successfully sued to have it removed from the ballot on the grounds that signature collection fraud had occurred. In Nevada, after the measure was certified for the ballot, a private coalition successfully sued to have it removed when the Nevada Supreme Court decided against the measure being on the ballot on the grounds that two slightly different versions of the wording had been submitted to the Secretary of State. In Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Supreme Court refused to certify the TABOR measure for the ballot on the grounds that insufficient signatures were collected and because the "evidence support[ed] substantial illegal participation of out-of-state circulators."[4]

Public Schools

ALG promotes a parental choice approach to solving the woes of the American public school system. It supports school vouchers and expansion of charter schools, arguing that competition among schools will increase both the quality and the economic efficiency of public education.[5] The organization believes that providing poor and middle-class parents with the economic means to choose from a variety of schools for their children will promote accountability in school administration, and permit parents a greater degree of control over the schools their children attend.

Judicial Accountability

A fourth issue of concern for ALG is accountability in the judicial system.[6] The group was involved in efforts to pass Montana CI-98 in 2006, a measure that would have allowed voters in that state to recall elected judges or justices for any reason--a change from Montana's pre-existing requirement that in order to recall a judge, incapacity, incompetence, misconduct, or a felony must have occurred. The initiative, along with two others, was removed from the ballot after a hard-fought series of legal challenges from opponents.[7]

Controversies

In 2006, the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center was a frequent critic of Americans for Limited Government, establishing a website, "Howie Rich Exposed"[8] devoted to attacking Howard Rich, the president of ALG. The most typical criticisms was the issue of "out-of-state money".[9],[10],[11]

After ALG's decision in December 2006 to move its national office from Illinois to Virginia, the Center for Public Integrity repeatedly claimed, although without substantiating the charge, that ALG was "forced out of Illinois in December 2006 for failing to comply with state charity laws."[1] The Center for Public Integrity, hasn't provided any details about who "forced" the organization to move, how the alleged force was applied, or any reason to believe that ALG couldn't have remediated what might have been a very minor technical compliance issue.

On the other hand, ALG hasn't denied CPI's December 21, 2006 report that "Three Big Donors Bankrolled Americans for Limited Government in 2005." [2]. According to CPI's award-winning investigative series [3], "Americans for Limited Government, the tax-exempt organization that bankrolled a series of controversial ballot initiatives this year, raised 99 percent of its $5.4 million in total contributions in 2005 from just three donors."

Recent news

This section displays the most recent stories in a google news search for the term "Americans + for + Limited + Government"

All stories may not be relevant to this organization due to the nature of the search engine.

Americans for Limited Government News Feed

  • Loading...

See also

External links

References

Portions of this article have been adapted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Copyright Notice can be found here.