Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Approved liquor privatization measure faces lawsuit in state of Washington"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Created page with '==='''December 8, 2011'''=== '''By [mailto:bdludlam@ballotpedia.org Bailey Ludlam]''' {{waseal}} '''OLYMPIA, Washington:''' Two labor unions, the United …')
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
'''By [mailto:bdludlam@ballotpedia.org Bailey Ludlam]'''
 
'''By [mailto:bdludlam@ballotpedia.org Bailey Ludlam]'''
 
{{waseal}}
 
{{waseal}}
'''OLYMPIA, [[Washington]]:''' Two labor unions, the United Food and Commercial Workers and the Teamsters, are challenging Washington's recently passed [[Washington Liquor State Licensing, Initiative 1183 (2011)|liquor privatization initiative]] (I-1183).  
+
'''OLYMPIA, [[Washington]]:''' Two labor unions, the United Food and Commercial Workers and the Teamsters, are challenging Washington's recently passed [[Washington Liquor State Licensing, Initiative 1183 (2011)|liquor privatization initiative]] (I-1183) in King County Superior Court.<ref name="Times"/>
  
Beside privatizing liquor sales, the unions note that the measure also changes regulations on wine distribution, liquor franchises, and alcohol advertising. This, they argue, violates the state's [[single-subject rule]].  
+
Beside privatizing liquor sales, the unions note that the measure also changes regulations on wine distribution, liquor franchises, and alcohol advertising. This, they argue, violates the state's [[single-subject rule]].<ref name="Times"/>
  
They also argue that these changes were designed to benefit the chief backer of the measure, Costco. Costco contributed an estimated $21 million to the effort in support of Initiative 1183.  
+
They also argue that these changes were designed to benefit the chief backer of the measure, Costco. Costco contributed an estimated $21 million to the effort in support of Initiative 1183.<ref name="Times"/>
  
About 1,000 union workers are expected to lose their current jobs under the plan.<ref>[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016947384_liquorsuit07.html ''The Seattle Times,'' "Unions sue to block liquor initiative from taking effect," December 6, 2011]</ref>
+
The two unions represent about 1,000 union workers that are expected to lose their current jobs under the plan.<ref name="Times">[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016947384_liquorsuit07.html ''The Seattle Times,'' "Unions sue to block liquor initiative from taking effect," December 6, 2011]</ref>
  
The measure was approved by 59% on [[Washington Liquor State Licensing, Initiative 1183 (2011)|November 8, 2011]].  
+
The measure was approved by 59% on [[Washington Liquor State Licensing, Initiative 1183 (2011)|November 8, 2011]]. Initiative 1183 officially becomes law on [[BC2011#December|December 8, 2011]].
  
 
:*The press release for the lawsuit can be found [http://blog.thenewstribune.com/politics/2011/12/06/unions-file-suit-against-private-liquor-i-1183-claim-it-violates-state-constitution-ban-on-having-two-subjects-in-one-law/ here.]
 
:*The press release for the lawsuit can be found [http://blog.thenewstribune.com/politics/2011/12/06/unions-file-suit-against-private-liquor-i-1183-claim-it-violates-state-constitution-ban-on-having-two-subjects-in-one-law/ here.]

Latest revision as of 09:49, 8 December 2011

December 8, 2011

By Bailey Ludlam

Washington

OLYMPIA, Washington: Two labor unions, the United Food and Commercial Workers and the Teamsters, are challenging Washington's recently passed liquor privatization initiative (I-1183) in King County Superior Court.[1]

Beside privatizing liquor sales, the unions note that the measure also changes regulations on wine distribution, liquor franchises, and alcohol advertising. This, they argue, violates the state's single-subject rule.[1]

They also argue that these changes were designed to benefit the chief backer of the measure, Costco. Costco contributed an estimated $21 million to the effort in support of Initiative 1183.[1]

The two unions represent about 1,000 union workers that are expected to lose their current jobs under the plan.[1]

The measure was approved by 59% on November 8, 2011. Initiative 1183 officially becomes law on December 8, 2011.

  • The press release for the lawsuit can be found here.

See also

Ballotpedia News

References