For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Arizona Public Judicial Review Amendment, Proposition 109 (1992)
The Arizona Public Judicial Review Amendment, also known as Proposition 109 and House Concurrent Resolution 2009, was a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot in Arizona, which was approved in the statewide election on November 3, 1992.
- This proposed amendment to Article VI allows increased public participation in the judicial selection process in Maricopa and Pima Counties.
|Arizona Proposition 109 (1992)|
Official results via: State of Arizona Official Canvass
Text of measure
The text of the ballot read:
House concurrent resolution 2009
Amending the Arizona Constitution to change the method of appointing Superior Court judges in counties with populations of at least 250,000 and all appellate judges; change the appointment and composition of the commissions on court appointments; provide for increased public participation; require consideration of population diversity; require a judicial evaluation system.
The full changes to the Constitution of Arizona can be found in the State of Arizona 1992 Ballot Propositions guide.
Those in support of the amendment include:
- State Bar of Arizona
Arguments in favor of the amendment include:
- Allowing the people to be more involved in the judicial system will garner more respect for the law and the administration of justice.
- The justice system will be more accountable to the people if this proposition passes.
- The proposition will require a public performance evaluation process for all justices and judges seeking to be retained in office.
Arguments in opposition of the amendment include:
- The merit system has produced high quality judges in the superior court and appellate courts.
- The proposition will give people with little law training more authority over the judicial appointment process.
- The state and county bar associations conduct thorough evaluations of judges and justices.
- State of Arizona 1992 Ballot Proposition voting guide
- Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
State of Arizona
|State executive officers||
Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Director of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Commissioner of Lands | Director of Labor | Chairman of Corporation Commission | State Mine Inspector |