Difference between revisions of "Arizona State Officials' Salary Increase Amendment, Proposition 301 (1992)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(az 1992 prop 301, new page)
m (Text replace - "ategory:Salaries of elected officials" to "ategory:Salaries of government officials")
Line 51: Line 51:
[[Category:Arizona 1992 ballot measures]]
[[Category:Arizona 1992 ballot measures]]
[[Category:Salaries of elected officials, Arizona]]
[[Category:Salaries of government officials, Arizona]]
[[Category:Salaries of elected officials, 1992]]
[[Category:Salaries of government officials, 1992]]

Revision as of 23:49, 12 June 2013

Voting on
Salaries of
Government Officials
Salaries of government officials.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Arizona Constitution
Flag of Arizona.png

The Arizona State Officials' Salary Increase Amendment, also known as Proposition 301 was a commission-referred constitutional amendment on the November 3, 1992 ballot in Arizona, where it was defeated.

  • This amendment was proposed to increase the pay of state legislators from $15,000 per annum to $19,748 per annum. [1]

Election results

Arizona Proposition 301 (1992)
Defeatedd No911,02565.11%
Yes 488,271 34.89%

Official results via: State of Arizona Official Canvass

Text of measure

The text of the ballot read:

Recommendation of the Commission on Salaries for Elected State Officers as to legislative salaries have been certified to the Secretary of State and are hereby submitted to the qualified electors for their approval or rejection.


Providing an increase in annual salary of state legislators from $15,000 to $19,748 beginning in January 1993 and increasing annual salary for terms beginning in January 1995 and 1997 by a percentage change based on the consumer price index as recommended by the Commission on Salaries for Elected Officers.[1][2]

See also

Suggest a link

External links


  1. 1.0 1.1 State of Arizona 1992 Ballot Proposition voting guide
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.