Ballotpedia:Who Runs the States, Nebraska

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 06:25, 21 May 2013 by Geoff Pallay (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Note: This page is in progress. The report is not completed yet.

WhoRunsTheStates Badge.png

Who Runs the States

Main Report Pages
Main PagePart 1Partisanship InfographicPart 2Part 3

Partisanship Results Report (Part 1)
Executive SummaryState Partisanship AnalysisPartisan Control of GovernorshipsPartisan Control of State LegislaturesPartisan Control of State SenatesPartisan Control of State HousesState Government TrifectasOverall Partisan Control: Bright, Medium and Soft StatesChanges of Partisan Domination over 22 yearsYear-to-Year Changes in State Partisan ControlTrifectas and Presidential Election PatternsConclusionMethodologyAppendix AAppendix B

State Quality of Life Index (SQLI) Report (Part 2)
Executive SummaryState Quality of Life Index (SQLI)About the IndexOverall RankingsDramatic Changes from 1st Half to 2nd HalfIndividual IndicatorsMethodologyAppendices

Partisanship and (SQLI) Overlay Report (Part 3)
IntroductionComparing Partisanship and the State Quality of Life Index (SQLI) RankingsDescription of the dataTrends and correlationsMethodologyKey Values for Fifty-State RegressionsAppendices
Praise or blame is extended to political parties for the economic, educational, health and other quality of life outcomes that result from the policies those parties enact into law. To better understand which political party enjoys power in each of the states, Ballotpedia has analyzed state government control from 1992-2013 using the concept of a "partisan trifecta." A partisan trifecta is defined as when a state's governorship and legislative chambers are controlled by the same political party.

The two major political parties claim that their policies will lead to better outcomes. What does the data show?

At Ballotpedia, we explored these issues in a three-part study, Who Runs the States.

This page takes a specific look at how Nebraska performed in the study.

Nebraska breakdown

  • Over the past 22 years, the Nebraska government has had seven years of Democratic governors and 15 of Republican governors.
  • All 15 years of Republican governors have come in the last 15 years consecutively.

Background about the study

See also: Ballotpedia: Who Runs the States

Part One examines the partisanship of state government from 1992-2013. Part Two establishes a State Quality of Life Index (SQLI), aggregating a variety of existing state indices into one measurement. Part Three will overlay the two reports, looking for trends and correlations.

Specific reports

Partisan control changes

There was only one partisan control change in Nebraska during the study period. The average number of changes in the 50 states was four, putting Nebraska significantly lower than the average.

Quality of life results

With it’s non-partisan legislature, Nebraska was unable to have any sort of trifecta, but Nebraska’s average ranking among all quality of life indices was 4.

Correlation of partisanship with quality of life

Using a panel data regression with fixed effects, we explored the correlations between Nebraska’s partisanship and the performance of the state relative to other states over time. To indicate partisanship, we adapted our partisan coding to incorporate Nebraska’s nonpartisan legislature, coding a Democratic governor as eight (8) and a Republican governor as two (2). The rankings corresponded with the more complete rankings in our partisanship analysis that coded each type of state government party control on a scale of one to nine (1 to 9). Both of Nebraska’s rankings assumed a split legislature. The performance of the state was determined by the composite ranking of state “Quality of Life” relative to other states described in the “Quality of Life” section of the main report. In our regression analysis, the “Quality of Life” performance ranking served as the dependent variable and the partisan coding of the government two years prior (i.e., a two-year lag) was the independent variable. We introduced the two-year lag to allow some time for the policies of the party governments to influence state’s performance, although the implementation time for many state policies vary widely. These analyses were not designed to definitively show a causal relationship between partisanship and a state’s performance, but rather to explore trends and encourage further research.

This regression analysis shows that Nebraska tends to have a higher performance ranking two years after having a Republican governor. This finding is statistically significant at the ten percent level and indicates a non-zero relationship between the two variables. However, the correlation is very weak, and its explanatory power is limited. Notably, Nebraska has experienced a long period of Republican governors preceded by a long period of Democratic governors in the study period. Thus, instances of variation in state government party control are relatively rare, and other trends and factors may have more explanatory power. These results should only be interpreted as correlation without further research, especially given the unique coding applied to Nebraska in this portion of the study. For more information, see Appendix C: Key Values for Individual State Regressions.

See also

External links

  • [Full Dataset on Google Docs]