Difference between revisions of "Berkeley FACTS Initiative, Measure V (November 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Supporters)
(External links)
Line 58: Line 58:
 
* [http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/uploadedFiles/Clerk/Elections/FACTS%20-%20Question%20and%20Full%20Text%20ONLY.pdf Text of Measure V]
 
* [http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/uploadedFiles/Clerk/Elections/FACTS%20-%20Question%20and%20Full%20Text%20ONLY.pdf Text of Measure V]
 
* [http://basiscraft.com/-/2012/10/08/widget/index.html Berkeley Ballot Measure Browser]
 
* [http://basiscraft.com/-/2012/10/08/widget/index.html Berkeley Ballot Measure Browser]
 +
* [http://committee4facts.com/ The "Yes on Measure V" website]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 07:42, 13 October 2012

A Berkeley FACTS Initiative ballot question, Measure V is on the November 6, 2012 ballot for voters in the City of Berkeley in Alameda County.[1][2]

Measure V would require that the City of Berkeley prepare an annual Certified Financial Report once every two years. The first such report would have to be published by March 1, 2013. The report would have to disclose:

  • All financial obligations for the next twenty year period for employee and retiree expenses, capital improvements and capital assets
  • The "productive capacity" of City services
  • An evaluation of the present value of these Long Term Obligations and the yearly expenses needed to meet them.

Support

Supporters

The official voter guide arguments in favor of Measure V were signed by:

  • Mark Humbert
  • Isabelle Gaston
  • Ted Edlin
  • Shannon R. Brown
  • Jesse Arrequin

Arguments in favor

The official voter guide arguments in favor of Measure V include:

  • The city has at least $1.2 billion in unfunded obligations, primarily for employee retirement costs.
  • Measure V will give the City Council and the public a clear picture of the city's long-term financial obligations.
  • The amount of money the city is having to spend every year to pay for previously unreported long-term obligations is getting out of hand and is getting worse every year. It is preventing the city from paying for important needs such as safety net services, streets, storm drains, and buildings.

Opposition

Opponents

The official voter guide arguments opposing Measure V were signed by:

  • Sherry Smith
  • Loni Hancock
  • Susan Wengraf
  • Judith Bloom
  • Gordon Wozniak

Arguments against

The official voter guide arguments opposing Measure V include:

  • Measure V could create financial risk for Berkeley.
  • Measure V would not allow the city to respond in a timely way to earthquakes.
  • Trying to forecast employee retirement costs twenty years into the future is "largely conjectural".

Ballot text

The question on the ballot:

MEASURE V: "Shall an ordinance requiring the City to publish certified biennial reports of its 20-year financial obligations for employee/retiree expenses, capital assets, and “productive capacity of City services”, the present value of those obligations, and the annual expenses needed to meet them, and prohibiting any new or increased debt financing, property-related fee, assessment or tax absent certification of the report by the City Manager or other, independent professional, be adopted?"[3]

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. Berkeleyside, "City Council approves pools measure, debates streets", June 27, 2012
  2. Berkeley Patch, "Deadline Looms for Ballot Arguments", August 16, 2012
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Flag of California.png

This article about a local California ballot measure is a stub. You can help people learn about California's local ballot measures by expanding it.