Difference between revisions of "California Honor in Office Act (2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: {{tnr}}A '''California Honor in Office Initiative''' may appear on the 2010 state ballot as an {{icafull}}. Jerrol LeBaron is the measure's officia...)
 
m (Text replace - "{{sbm update}}" to "{{Hbm format}}")
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''California Honor in Office Initiative''' may appear on the [[California 2010 ballot propositions|2010 state ballot]] as an {{icafull}}.
+
{{Hbm format}}
 +
{{noca2010}}{{tnr}}A '''California Honor in Office Initiative''' was intended for but will not be on the [[California 2010 ballot propositions|2010 state ballot]] as an {{icafull}}.
  
Jerrol LeBaron is the measure's official proponent.   
+
Jerrol LeBaron was the measure's official proponent.   
  
The proposed initiative has these provisions:
+
The proposed initiative had these provisions:
  
 
* [[California State Legislature|California's state legislators]] would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.  
 
* [[California State Legislature|California's state legislators]] would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.  
Line 10: Line 11:
 
==Fiscal impact==
 
==Fiscal impact==
  
The [[California Legislative Analyst's Office]] estimates the fiscal impact on state and local government as:
+
The [[California Legislative Analyst's Office]] estimated the fiscal impact on state and local government as:
  
 
:"Probably no net increase in state costs."
 
:"Probably no net increase in state costs."
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
+
* [[North Dakota Read Bills Before Vote Initiative (2010)]]
 
* [[California signature requirements]]
 
* [[California signature requirements]]
  
Line 22: Line 23:
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i809_09-0012_amdt_2ns.pdf Letter to Attorney General requesting ballot title]
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i809_09-0012_amdt_2ns.pdf Letter to Attorney General requesting ballot title]
  
{{california}}
+
[[Category:Did not make ballot, state legislatures measures]]
{{california stub}}
+
[[Category:Did not make ballot, administration of government]]
 
+
[[Category:Did not make ballot, law enforcement]]
[[Category:California 2010 ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:State legislature, California]]
+
[[Category:Administration of government, California]]
+
[[Category:Law enforcement, California]]
+

Revision as of 18:02, 30 October 2013


Not on Ballot
Proposed allot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure did not or
will not appear on a ballot
A California Honor in Office Initiative was intended for but will not be on the 2010 state ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment.

Jerrol LeBaron was the measure's official proponent.

The proposed initiative had these provisions:

  • California's state legislators would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.
  • Legislators would be prohibited from voting on legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they had not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.

Fiscal impact

The California Legislative Analyst's Office estimated the fiscal impact on state and local government as:

"Probably no net increase in state costs."

See also

External links