Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Difference between revisions of "California Honor in Office Act (2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Added date to AIT)
m (Text replace - ", accessed February" to "," accessed February")
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Hbm format|Month=October 2013|Reason=Needs new format update}}
+
{{noca2010}}{{tnr}}{{State legislatures measures}}A '''California Honor in Office Initiative''' was intended for but did not appear on the [[California 2010 ballot propositions|2010 state ballot]] as an {{icafull}}.
{{noca2010}}{{tnr}}A '''California Honor in Office Initiative''' was intended for but will not be on the [[California 2010 ballot propositions|2010 state ballot]] as an {{icafull}}.
+
  
Jerrol LeBaron was the measure's official proponent.
+
Jerrol LeBaron was the measure's official proponent.<ref name=SOS>[http://oag.ca.gov/initiatives/inactive-measures?field_initiative_date_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Byear%5D=2007 California Secretary of State, List of 2009 initiatives," accessed February 2014]</ref>
  
The proposed initiative had these provisions:
+
==Provisions==
 +
The proposed initiative had these provisions:<ref name=TEXT/>[http://oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/Title%20and%20Summary%20%28i809_09-0012_title_and_summary%29.pdf? California Attorney General website, Initiative 09-0012 title and summary," accessed February 14, 2014]</ref>
  
 
* [[California State Legislature|California's state legislators]] would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.  
 
* [[California State Legislature|California's state legislators]] would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.  
 
* Legislators would be prohibited from voting on legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they had not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.
 
* Legislators would be prohibited from voting on legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they had not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.
  
==Fiscal impact==
+
==Text of measure==
 +
The Attorney General issued the following ballot title, summary and statement of estimated fiscal impact for this initiative:<ref name=TEXT/>
 +
===Ballot title===
 +
{{Quote|
 +
Requirement for legislators to certify that they understand legislation and have not accepted a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.}}
  
The [[California Legislative Analyst's Office]] estimated the fiscal impact on state and local government as:
+
===Summary===
 +
{{Quote|
 +
Prohibits
 +
legislators from voting in support of legislation unless they certify under penalty of perjury that
 +
they have read and understood the legislation and execute a statement regarding their duties to
 +
the People. Prohibits legislators from voting on legislation unless they certify under penalty of
 +
perjury that they have not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.}}
  
:"Probably no net increase in state costs."
+
===Fiscal impact===
  
==See also==
+
{{Quote|
 +
Probably no net increase in state costs.}}
 +
 
 +
==Similar measures==
 
* [[North Dakota Read Bills Before Vote Initiative (2010)]]
 
* [[North Dakota Read Bills Before Vote Initiative (2010)]]
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[California 2010 ballot propositions]]
 
* [[California signature requirements]]
 
* [[California signature requirements]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{submit a link}}
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i809_09-0012_amdt_2ns.pdf Letter to Attorney General requesting ballot title]
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i809_09-0012_amdt_2ns.pdf Letter to Attorney General requesting ballot title]
  
 +
==References==
 +
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, state legislatures measures]]
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, state legislatures measures]]
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, administration of government]]
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, administration of government]]
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, law enforcement]]
 
[[Category:Did not make ballot, law enforcement]]

Latest revision as of 08:54, 2 January 2015

Not on Ballot
Proposed allot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure did not or
will not appear on a ballot
Voting on
State Legislature
State legislatures measures.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
A California Honor in Office Initiative was intended for but did not appear on the 2010 state ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment.

Jerrol LeBaron was the measure's official proponent.[1]

Provisions

The proposed initiative had these provisions:[2]California Attorney General website, Initiative 09-0012 title and summary," accessed February 14, 2014</ref>

  • California's state legislators would be prohibited from voting in support of legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and executed a statement regarding their duties to the People.
  • Legislators would be prohibited from voting on legislation unless they certified under penalty of perjury that they had not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.

Text of measure

The Attorney General issued the following ballot title, summary and statement of estimated fiscal impact for this initiative:[2]

Ballot title

Requirement for legislators to certify that they understand legislation and have not accepted a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.[3]

Summary

Prohibits legislators from voting in support of legislation unless they certify under penalty of perjury that they have read and understood the legislation and execute a statement regarding their duties to the People. Prohibits legislators from voting on legislation unless they certify under penalty of perjury that they have not received a bribe or engaged in illegal vote swapping.[3]

Fiscal impact

Probably no net increase in state costs.[3]

Similar measures

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. California Secretary of State, List of 2009 initiatives," accessed February 2014
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named TEXT
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.