PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Difference between revisions of "California Pollution Producers To Pay for Pollution Mitigation (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - 'signatures would have to be turned in by March 2, 2012.' to 'signatures would have had to be turned in by March 2, 2012.')
m (Text replace - "==Ballot language==" to "==Text of measure==")
(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''California Pollution Producers To Pay for Pollution Mitigation Initiative''' (#11-0078, #11-0079) has been {{circulation}} in [[California]] as an {{icafull}}.  To earn a spot on the [[California 2012 ballot propositions|state's 2012 ballot]], sponsors of the initiative must collect [[California signature requirements|807,615 signatures]].
+
{{noca2012}}{{tnr}}A '''California Pollution Producers To Pay for Pollution Mitigation Initiative''' (#11-0078, #11-0079) was {{circulation}} in [[California]] as a contender for the [[California 2012 ballot propositions|November 6, 2012 ballot]].
  
If the initiative qualifies for the ballot and is approved by the state's voters, it will:
+
Its sponsors, however, did not submit any signatures to election officials by the deadline.
  
* Permit the [[California State Legislature]] to pass by majority vote (rather than a {{2/3}}), laws imposing fees, penalties and charges on businesses whose activities "pollute the air or water, damage public natural resources or harm public health."
+
If the initiative had qualified for the ballot and been approved by the state's voters, it would have:
* Require the state government to spend the funds raised under the laws only on mitigation of actual or anticipated impacts, including enforcement costs and costs to reduce or prevent future impacts from the pollution or activity.
+
* Require that the amount of any fee, penalty or charge must be reasonably related to the costs of mitigation.
+
  
Joseph Caves, who submitted the ballot language for each version, refers to each version as the "Polluter Accountability Act".
+
* Permitted the [[California State Legislature]] to pass by majority vote (rather than a {{2/3}}), laws imposing fees, penalties and charges on businesses whose activities "pollute the air or water, damage public natural resources or harm public health."
 +
* Required the state government to spend the funds raised under the laws only on mitigation of actual or anticipated impacts, including enforcement costs and costs to reduce or prevent future impacts from the pollution or activity.
 +
* Required that the amount of any fee, penalty or charge must be reasonably related to the costs of mitigation.
  
==Ballot language==
+
Joseph Caves, who submitted the ballot language for each version, referred to each version as the "Polluter Accountability Act".
 +
 
 +
==Text of measure==
  
 
:: ''See also: [[Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California 2012 ballot propositions|Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California's 2012 ballot propositions]]''
 
:: ''See also: [[Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California 2012 ballot propositions|Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California's 2012 ballot propositions]]''
Line 49: Line 51:
  
 
* Joseph Caves submitted two letters requesting [[ballot title]]s on two different versions of the proposed initiative. One version was filed on November 17, 2011 and one version was filed on November 18, 2011.  
 
* Joseph Caves submitted two letters requesting [[ballot title]]s on two different versions of the proposed initiative. One version was filed on November 17, 2011 and one version was filed on November 18, 2011.  
* Either version will require [[California signature requirements|807,615 valid signatures]] for qualification purposes.
+
* Either version would have required [[California signature requirements|807,615 valid signatures]] for qualification purposes.
* The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0079 is June 11, 2012.
+
* The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0079 was June 11, 2012.
* The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0078 is June 18, 2012.
+
* The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0078 was June 18, 2012.
* To qualify for the [[California 2012 ballot propositions|November 6, 2012 ballot]], signatures must be submitted earlier than the initiative's 150-day deadline. If the number of signatures submitted is such that the full-check verification method must be deployed, the signatures would have had to be turned in by March 2, 2012. For the [[random sampling]] method, signatures would have to be submitted by late April.  
+
* No signatures were filed by either filing deadline.
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 59: Line 61:
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i1023_11-0079_%28polluters_v2%29.pdf Letter requesting a ballot title for Initiative 11-0079]
 
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i1023_11-0079_%28polluters_v2%29.pdf Letter requesting a ballot title for Initiative 11-0079]
  
{{casbm stub}}
+
{{california}}
  
[[Category:California 2012 ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:Did not make ballot, environment]]
[[Category:Environment, 2012]]
+
[[Category:Did not make ballot, business regulation]]
[[Category:Environment, California]]
+
[[Category:Business regulation, 2012]]
+
[[Category:Business regulation, California]]
+

Revision as of 10:57, 20 September 2012

Not on Ballot
Proposed allot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure did not or
will not appear on a ballot
A California Pollution Producers To Pay for Pollution Mitigation Initiative (#11-0078, #11-0079) was approved for circulation in California as a contender for the November 6, 2012 ballot.

Its sponsors, however, did not submit any signatures to election officials by the deadline.

If the initiative had qualified for the ballot and been approved by the state's voters, it would have:

  • Permitted the California State Legislature to pass by majority vote (rather than a 2/3rds supermajority vote), laws imposing fees, penalties and charges on businesses whose activities "pollute the air or water, damage public natural resources or harm public health."
  • Required the state government to spend the funds raised under the laws only on mitigation of actual or anticipated impacts, including enforcement costs and costs to reduce or prevent future impacts from the pollution or activity.
  • Required that the amount of any fee, penalty or charge must be reasonably related to the costs of mitigation.

Joseph Caves, who submitted the ballot language for each version, referred to each version as the "Polluter Accountability Act".

Text of measure

See also: Ballot titles, summaries and fiscal statements for California's 2012 ballot propositions

11-0078

Ballot title:

Voting Requirement. Polluter Fees. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Official summary:

"Permits the Legislature to pass by majority vote, rather than two-thirds, laws imposing fees, penalties and charges on businesses whose activities pollute the air or water, damage public natural resources or harm public health. Requires the State spend the funds raised under the laws only on mitigation of actual or anticipated impacts, including enforcement costs and costs to reduce or prevent future impacts from the pollution or activity. Requires the amount of any fee, penalty or charge be reasonably related to the costs of mitigation."

Summary of estimated fiscal impact:

(This is a summary of the initiative's estimated "fiscal impact on state and local government" prepared by the California Legislative Analyst's Office and the Director of Finance.)

"Potential increase in state revenues, likely ranging in the tens of millions of dollars to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on future actions of the Legislature. The revenues would be used to increase state spending on mitigation activities."

11-0079

Ballot title:

Voting Requirement. Polluter Fees. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

Official summary:

"Permits the Legislature to pass by majority vote, rather than two-thirds, laws imposing fees, penalties and charges on activities that pollute the air or water, damage public natural resources or harm public health. Requires the State spend the funds raised under the laws only on mitigation of actual or anticipated impacts, including enforcement costs and costs to reduce or prevent future impacts from the pollution or activity. Requires the amount of any fee, penalty or charge be reasonably related to the costs of mitigation."

Summary of estimated fiscal impact:

(This is a summary of the initiative's estimated "fiscal impact on state and local government" prepared by the California Legislative Analyst's Office and the Director of Finance.)

"Potential increase in state revenues, likely ranging in the tens of millions of dollars to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on future actions of the Legislature. The revenues would be used to increase state spending on mitigation activities."

Path to the ballot

See also: California signature requirements
  • Joseph Caves submitted two letters requesting ballot titles on two different versions of the proposed initiative. One version was filed on November 17, 2011 and one version was filed on November 18, 2011.
  • Either version would have required 807,615 valid signatures for qualification purposes.
  • The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0079 was June 11, 2012.
  • The 150-day circulation deadline for Version #11-0078 was June 18, 2012.
  • No signatures were filed by either filing deadline.

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link