Difference between revisions of "California Proposition 6, Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses for Human Consumption (1998)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "==Ballot language==" to "==Text of measure==")
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AnimalRights}}{{TOCnestright}}'''California Proposition 6''', also called the '''Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption Initiative''', was on the [[California 1998 ballot propositions#November 3 general election|November 3, 1998]] election ballot in [[California]] as an [[initiated state statute]], where it was '''approved.'''
+
{{Treatment of animals}}{{TOCnestright}}'''California Proposition 6''', also called the '''Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption Initiative''', was on the [[California 1998 ballot propositions#November 3|November 3, 1998]] election ballot in [[California]] as an {{issfull}}, where it was '''approved.'''
  
Proposition 6 prohibits the slaughter of horses for human consumption and the sale of horsemeat for human consumption in California. It also prohibits sending horses out of California for slaughter in other states or countries for human consumption. "Horses" is defined as any horse, pony, burro, or mule.
+
Proposition 6 prohibited the slaughter of horses for human consumption and the sale of horsemeat for human consumption in California. It also prohibited sending horses out of California for slaughter in other states or countries for human consumption. "Horses" is defined as any horse, pony, burro, or mule.
  
Proposition 6 also established elony and misdemeanor criminal penalties for violations of its provisions.  
+
Proposition 6 also established felony and misdemeanor criminal penalties for violations of its provisions.  
  
 
==Election results==
 
==Election results==
  
{| border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #cef2e0; border: 1px #a3bfb1 solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;"
+
{{Short outcome
|- style="background-color:#faecc8"
+
| title = Proposition 6
! colspan="5" | California Proposition 11 (1998)
+
| yes = 4,672,457
|-bgcolor="#cef2e0 align="center"
+
| yespct = 59.39
! colspan="2" style="width: 17em" |
+
| no = 3,195,619
! style="width: 5em" |Votes
+
| nopct = 40.61
! style="width: 7em" |Percentage
+
| total = 7,868,076
|-
+
| turnoutpct = 41.4
| colspan="2" |  '''YES''' [[Image:15px-600px-Yes check.png|14px]]
+
}}
| align="right" | '''4,672,457'''
+
Of voters who cast a vote in this election, 753,045 or 8.73% did not cast a vote on Proposition 6.
| align="right" | '''59.4%'''
+
|-
+
| colspan="2" |  No
+
| align="right" | 3,195,619
+
| align="right" | 40.6%
+
|-bgcolor="#cef2e0"
+
| colspan="2" style="text-align: right; margin-right: 0.5em" | '''Total votes'''
+
| align="right"            | '''7,868,076'''
+
| align="right"            | '''100%'''
+
|}
+
  
==Ballot Language==
+
==Text of measure==
  
The language that appeared on the ballot:
+
===Title===
  
Makes possession, transfer, or receipt of horses for slaughter for human consumption a felony. Makes sale of horsemeat for human consumption a misdemeanor.
+
The [[ballot title]] was:
  
==Campaign Spending==
+
<center>'''Criminal Law. Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption. Initiative Statute.'''</center>
 +
 
 +
===Summary===
 +
 
 +
[[File:Proposition 6.PNG|right]]
 +
The official [[ballot summary (California)|ballot summary]] said:
 +
 
 +
* Prohibits any person from possessing, transferring, receiving or holding any horse, pony, burro or mule with intent to kill it or have it killed, where the person knows or should know that any part of the animal will be used for human consumption. Provides that a violation constitutes a felony offense.
 +
* Also adds a provision making the sale of horsemeat for human consumption a misdemeanor offense, with subsequent violations punished as felonies.
 +
 
 +
===Fiscal impact===
 +
 
 +
The [[California Legislative Analyst's Office]] provided an estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact for Proposition 6.  That estimate was:
 +
 
 +
* "The measure could result in some increased law enforcement and incarceration costs at both the state and local level. These costs probably would be minor, if any."
 +
 
 +
==Campaign spending==
  
 
===Supporters===
 
===Supporters===
Line 53: Line 59:
 
===Opponents===
 
===Opponents===
  
No contributions in opposition of Proposition 6 were reported to the Secretary of State.
+
No contributions in opposition of Proposition 6 were reported to the [[California Secretary of State]].
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
+
* [[1998 ballot measures]]
 
* [[California 1998 ballot propositions]]
 
* [[California 1998 ballot propositions]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{colbegin|2}}
 
* [http://vote98.sos.ca.gov/VoterGuide/Propositions/6.htm Official California Voter Guide to Proposition 6]
 
* [http://vote98.sos.ca.gov/VoterGuide/Propositions/6.htm Official California Voter Guide to Proposition 6]
 
* [http://www.smartvoter.org/1998nov/ca/state/prop/6/ Smart Voter on Proposition 6]
 
* [http://www.smartvoter.org/1998nov/ca/state/prop/6/ Smart Voter on Proposition 6]
Line 66: Line 72:
 
* [http://vote98.sos.ca.gov/Final/sov/SOV80-91.pdf November 3 California proposition election results]
 
* [http://vote98.sos.ca.gov/Final/sov/SOV80-91.pdf November 3 California proposition election results]
 
* [http://www.calvoter.org/voter/elections/archive/98general/followthemoney/topten1.html#6 Top Ten Contributors to the Proposition 6 campaign]
 
* [http://www.calvoter.org/voter/elections/archive/98general/followthemoney/topten1.html#6 Top Ten Contributors to the Proposition 6 campaign]
 +
{{colend}}
  
 +
{{1998 ballot measures}}
 
{{California}}
 
{{California}}
  
[[Category:Animal rights, California]]
 
 
[[Category:California 1998 ballot measures]]
 
[[Category:California 1998 ballot measures]]
 +
[[Category:Treatment of animals, California]]
 +
[[Category:Treatment of animals, 1998]]

Latest revision as of 10:59, 20 September 2012

Voting on the
Treatment of Animals
Wolf.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
California Proposition 6, also called the Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption Initiative, was on the November 3, 1998 election ballot in California as an initiated state statute, where it was approved.

Proposition 6 prohibited the slaughter of horses for human consumption and the sale of horsemeat for human consumption in California. It also prohibited sending horses out of California for slaughter in other states or countries for human consumption. "Horses" is defined as any horse, pony, burro, or mule.

Proposition 6 also established felony and misdemeanor criminal penalties for violations of its provisions.

Election results

Proposition 6
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 4,672,457 59.39%
No3,195,61940.61%

Of voters who cast a vote in this election, 753,045 or 8.73% did not cast a vote on Proposition 6.

Text of measure

Title

The ballot title was:

Criminal Law. Prohibition on Slaughter of Horses and Sale of Horsemeat for Human Consumption. Initiative Statute.

Summary

Proposition 6.PNG

The official ballot summary said:

  • Prohibits any person from possessing, transferring, receiving or holding any horse, pony, burro or mule with intent to kill it or have it killed, where the person knows or should know that any part of the animal will be used for human consumption. Provides that a violation constitutes a felony offense.
  • Also adds a provision making the sale of horsemeat for human consumption a misdemeanor offense, with subsequent violations punished as felonies.

Fiscal impact

The California Legislative Analyst's Office provided an estimate of net state and local government fiscal impact for Proposition 6. That estimate was:

  • "The measure could result in some increased law enforcement and incarceration costs at both the state and local level. These costs probably would be minor, if any."

Campaign spending

Supporters

Supporters of Proposition 6 spent $1,206,835. The top contributors to pass the measure were:

  • Sue Maloney Stiles: $200,000
  • Sherry Ellen Deboer: $180,000
  • Sidne J. Long: $125,000
  • Tina Long: $125,000
  • Political Animals PAC: $80,927
  • MPL Communications, Inc.: $71,000
  • Friends of Animals Inc.: $63,305
  • Comm. for Prop 6 Sponsored by the Humane Farming Action Fund: $21,000
  • Humane Farming Association: $20,000
  • Phoebe Hearst Cooke: $20,000

Opponents

No contributions in opposition of Proposition 6 were reported to the California Secretary of State.

See also

External links