Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




California Repeal of Proposition 8 (2012)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 06:44, 8 September 2009 by Polycal (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Marriage and Family
Wedding rings.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
A Repeal of Proposition 8 may appear on the 2010 ballot in California as an effort to repeal California Proposition 8 (2008) through the state's initiative procedure.

Individuals and key organizations in California's LGBT community have differing opinions about both the timing of a ballot initiative to repeal the provisions of Proposition 8, and about the exact language or approach to use in the text of a repeal-8 amendment.[1][2]

In mid-August 2009, Equality California, which is a leading organization on the marriage equality side, announced that it is going to wait until 2012 to push a repeal measure. The Courage Campaign said that it was pushing ahead with plans for a 2010 effort.[3]

The last day to file language to qualify for the 2010 ballot is September 25.[4]

Uncertainty about best date

Those who want to repeal Proposition 8 through a ballot initiative have been engaged in a tense, months-long dialogue about whether this should be done in 2010 or 2012.

Matt Foreman, director of the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund's gay and lesbian program, said, "The situation with these opposing factions is one of the most distressing things I've seen in my 25 years working in the gay movement."[3]

Straw poll

On July 25, a straw poll was conducted at a gathering of leaders of the same-sex movement in San Bernardino.[4]

2010 2012 Undecided
93 49 20

In favor of 2012

Reasons that have been put forward to support the idea of waiting until 2012 include:

  • Uncertainty about whether the $40 million or so that consultants think will be needed can be raised in 2010, an off-year politically.
  • A similar doubt about whether it might be more difficult to recruit campaign volunteers in an off-year.
  • The Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club of San Francisco is concerned that a 2010 measure "would require a rush that could cause our community to take shortcuts, miss important messages and fail to make critical connections. If we set the vote for 2010, we essentially need to net 1,000 voters per day, a theoretically achievable but extraordinarily ambitious goal."[5]
  • David Bohnett, who gave over $1 million to the 2008 campaign to defeat Prop 8, said that he and other "major No on 8 donors" are not clear that 2010 is the right year and that "we will step up to the plate — with resources and talent — when the time is right."[6]
  • Marc Solomon of Equality California told the New York Times that he asked "nearly two dozen California political consultants and pollsters" in June and July 2009 what they thought about 2010 versus 2012 and that these people were almost unanimous in believing that it would be best to wait beyond 2010.[6]
  • The polls haven't moved since Prop 8 won.[6]
  • Hans Johnson, board member of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said "A slapdash effort based on wishful thinking, rosy scenarios, and passion, is not enough to win on."[6]

A coalition group called Prepare to Prevail has formed and on July 13 it issued a statement saying that going back to the ballot in 2010 would be "rushed and risky".[6]

Go for 2010

Logo of Love, Honor, Cherish
  • Members of the Courage Campaign are heavily in favor of the 2010 option.[4] The Courage Campaign has spent $200,000 on public opinion research and focus groups to provide guidance on possible ballot language.[7]
  • John M. Cleary, president of the Stonewall Democratic Club, said that younger activists in his group want to move on this in 2010. Cleary said, "I find the language of some of the organizations really self-defeating. And I think we have a moral obligation to overturn this."[6]
  • "Love, Honor, Cherish" advocates a 2010 effort and has published a blueprint for what that would look like.[8]

A key organizational meeting was held in San Francisco on August 29, 2009 by those who support a 2010 repeal initiative. The objective of the meeting was to develop a structure for gathering petition signatures and to choose a leadership team.[9]

If the group files language for an initiative by September 25, it would be able to start collecting signatures in November. A plan discussed at the meeting for collecting the required signatures was named "The Davis Plan"; this involves dividing the state into ten regions with leaders in each region tasked with collecting a certain number of signatures.

Groups and individuals present at the August 29 meeting included:

  • California Coalition for Marriage Equality
  • Courage Campaign
  • John Henning, executive director of "Love Honor Cherish"
  • Chaz Lowe of "Yes on Equality".
  • Zakiya Khabir, Jordon Krueger, Lester Aponte, Lisa Kove, Kelechi Anyanwu, and Misha Houser were elected to an administrative leadership team, along with Henning and Lowe.[9]

A website, "Repeal Prop 8 in 2010" has been established.

June or November?

Among those who advocate the 2010 ballot, there is discussion about whether it should go on the June or the November 2010 statewide ballot.[10]

In early July, a campaign that had been collecting signatures to qualify a repeal measure for the June 2010 ballot said it had decided that it would be a better strategy to wait and have a repeal measure on the November 2010 ballot. Brendan Ross, a spokesman for "Yes! on Equality" told a reporter that they are "...no longer gathering signatures for the first initiative, but will still use those pages of signatures as contacts for when it's time to continue gathering signatures."[11]

Possible ballot language

Language possibilities

  • Some LGBT groups believe it is important to provide a religious exemption in any amendment to repeal Proposition 8.
  • Explicitly addressing questions about school curriculum is also thought by some to be advisable in light of a widespread belief that television ads run in the 2008 campaign by the "Yes on 8" campaign that stated that children would have to be taught about same-sex marriage in school were effective in swinging votes toward the "Yes on 8" side.[2]
  • However, some say that a ballot initiative should not say that same-sex marriage wouldn't be taught in schools. Judy Appel of the Our Family Coalition said that if LGBT ballot initiative supporters put in language saying that gay marriage won't be taught in schools, they are heading down the wrong path because it sets up a conflict between two rights: the right to marry and the right to talk about marriage with children. It's not a good idea, she feels, to advocate for one right but not the other.[12]

A poll commissioned from David Binder of David Binder Research and Amy Simon of Goodwin Simon Victoria Research showed that 64% of those surveyed agreed that issues about gays and lesbians should be discussed at home, not in public schools, compared to 30 percent who disagreed with that statement. The poll also indicated that when language is included in a proposed initiative that says that the measure is "not intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, modify or change the curriculum in any school", the number of those who say they would vote in favor of an amendment to repeal Prop 8 goes up a few points than if that language is not part of the proposed amendment.[2]

Filed, active

In California, the first step to putting an initiative on the ballot is filing proposed language with the California Secretary of State. As of early August 2009, these initiatives related to the repeal of Proposition 8 are active possibilities:

  • 09-0003: Substitutes Domestic Partnership for Marriage in California Law. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute. This was filed by Kaelan Housewright and Ali Shams. According to the brief official summary, it would "replace the term "marriage" with the term "domestic partnership" throughout California law, but preserves the rights provided in marriage. Applies equally to all couples, regardless of sexual orientation. Repeals the provision in California's Constitution that states only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." Signature deadline: August 6, 2009.[13]
  • 09-0002, Amdt. #1S: Reinstates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. This was filed by Charles Lowe of "Yes! on Equality." A brief official summary describes it as, "Repeals the current provision in California's Constitution that states only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Provides that the initiative is not intended, and shall not be interpreted, to modify or change the curriculum in any school. Clarifies that the initiative is not intended, and shall not be interpreted, to mandate or require clergy of any church to perform a service or duty inconsistent with his or her faith." Signature deadline: August 17, 2009.[14]
  • 09-0011: Reinstates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Like 09-0002, this was filed by Charles Lowe of "Yes! on Equality." A brief official summary describes it as, "Repeals the current provision in California’s Constitution that states only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Provides that the initiative is not intended, and shall not be interpreted, to modify or change the curriculum in any school. Clarifies that the initiative is not intended, and shall not be interpreted, to mandate or require clergy of any church or religious institution to perform a service or duty inconsistent with his or her faith." Signature deadline: November 19, 2009.[15][16]

Anecdotal evidence from the community of paid professional signature-gatherers in the state suggests that none of these petitions are under active circulation in the state and therefore, are unlikely to collect enough signatures by their respective deadlines.[17]

Different campaign than 2008

As the marriage equality community debates when it should push to have an initiative on the ballot, the community of those who want to repeal Prop 8 are also discussing ways they think a campaign should be different from the campaign run in 2008 to try to defeat Prop 8.

Ideas that have been suggested as to how a new campaign should differ include:

  • More outreach to African Americans and Latinos.[5]
  • Put most emphasis on sharing personal stories.[5]

See also

External links

References