For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
California School Vouchers for Foster Children Initiative (2010)
|Not on Ballot|
| This measure did not or |
will not appear on a ballot
On November 18, 2009, William E. Oberndorf filed a request with the Office of the California Attorney General for an official ballot title on an act that he is calling the "Foster Child Opportunity Scholarship Act." Once the attorney general's office has provided that title, supporters will be able to start collecting signatures.
The ballot title for 09-0085 is:
The letter requesting a ballot title was filed by Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor.
The official ballot summary is:
- "Requires the State to offer annual private-school scholarships for foster children eligible to attend kindergarten through twelfth grade. Amends Constitution to allow foster children to use these scholarships at religious schools, if they choose to do so. Limits the value of the scholarships to no more than the amount of state funding per pupil provided for charter school pupils. Requires each foster child in private school who has received the scholarship to take state-mandated academic tests."
The fiscal estimate provided by the California Legislative Analyst's Office says, "No impact on total education funding at the state level. Minor reduction in education costs at local public schools."
According to the language filed with election officials, the motivations for the proposed initiative are:
(a) Approximately 50,000 K-12 school-age foster children reside in California.
(b) The appropriate responsible adults in foster children's lives have legal and effective responsibility to make decisions that will best help each foster child become an educated, productive member of society.
(c) Most foster children attend public schools in the district of their foster residence. Often foster children change residences and therefore must change schools. This is not always best for their educational needs.
(d) Private schools are currently not an available option to most foster children, but their ability to attend them could improve their educational outcomes and provide a dimension of stability to this aspect of their lives.
( e) California should expand opportunities for foster children to be educated in schools that best suit their needs by permitting the funding used to otherwise pay for costs of educating foster children in public schools to be used toward the costs of their education at California qualified private schools chosen by the appropriate responsible adult in their lives.
The editorial board of the Orange County Register wrote in January 2010, "This is potentially a promising way to introduce more competition and reform into California's underperforming public education system. More broadly, it would give school choice a beta test in California...This effort could become a valuable test for improving education in California and, at the same time, extend more opportunities to some of our most disadvantaged individuals."