Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 2 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit

City of Hialeah Pension Reform Charter Amendment Question (November 2013)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 14:11, 16 October 2013 by Josh Altic (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on Local

Pension Hotspots Report
Local Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Hotspots Reports
Current edition
Original Case study
San Jose & San Diego
State-wide Measures
A City of Hialeah Pension Reform Charter Amendment Question ballot question is on the November 5, 2013, election ballot for voters in the city of Hialeah in Miami-Dade County, which is in Florida.[1]

Currently in Hialeah, elected council members are given a pension after they reach the age of 55 and if they have completed 12 years or more of service on the city council. This is not by any means common in South Florida cities. The charter amendment referendum facing voters in November would do away with these pension benefits to future city officials, beginning in January of 2014. Moreover, if approved, this measure would require any changes to the pension plans of elected officials to approved by a city-wide vote. The referendum would do nothing to change the payments being made to mayors and city councilors who have already retired.[2]


Examples of city officials receiving pensions:[2]

  • Former mayor Raul Marinez gathers $180,000 a year from Hialeah tax payers and has done so since his retirement in the early 2000s.
  • Current Mayor Carlos Hernandez will get nearly 190,000 in annual pension payments after he leaves office.

This measure has been passed off by some as simply an electoral trick, aiming to give a boost to a mayoral candidate at the polls in the November election. This view is bolstered by the fact that in 2011 the city council attached a similar referendum measure to the general election ballot.[2]

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

"Revising Pension Article to require voter approval of future changes to elected officials pension"

Shall the City amend the pension provisions of the Hialeah Charter to require Hialeah voters to approve any future changes to the pension plan for elected officials, which will be closed to new elected officials beginning on January 1,2014[1][3]

A copy of the agenda of the city council meeting which approved this question for the ballot is available here.



Arguments in favor

Proponents argue that the city has had serious budgetting issues lately and should reserve revenue for city services rather than giving it away to a large pension fund for city officials. Supporters of the referendum that lean towards Libertarian principles say that elected officials are public servant and should be motivated by desire for the common good instead of money. Some even argue that mayors should not even receive a salary, let alone a pension.

Those arguing in favor of the referendum point to cities that do not even compensate their mayors at all, such as Coral Gables and Surfside.[2]



Arguments against

Anthony Luis, who is the president of the local Police Benevolent Association, said that, according to his viewpoint, the referendum is unfair to future candidates who were considering their pension when they filed to be candidates.

Mayoral candidate Juan Santana, holds the position that the referendum is just an excuse. "They don't have money anymore. They're gutting the pension fund because it can't be funded anymore. But they're making it seem as if they were doing something heroic, of their own choice."

See also

External links

Suggest a link


  1. 1.0 1.1 Merced County November 5, 2013 ballot measures
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5, "Vote YES on Hialeah Pension Referendum," October 13, 2013
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.