Difference between revisions of "City of Oxnard Traffic Initiative, Measure V (November 2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}'''Measure V''', or the '''Oxnard Traffic Initiative''', was on the [[November 4, 2008 ballot measures in California|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[Ventura County, California ballot measures|Ventura County]], California for voters in the city of Oxnard.
+
{{tnr}}A '''City of Oxnard Traffic Initiative, Measure V''' ballot question was on the [[November 4, 2008 ballot measures in California|November 4, 2008 ballot]] for voters in the City of Oxnard in [[Ventura County, California ballot measures#November 4|Ventura County]], where it was '''defeated.'''
  
'''The measure was defeated with 38.37% of the vote.'''
+
If Measure V had been approved, it would have required that all intersections within a five-mile radius of a proposed development be fixed before a project could receive approval. If the intersections are not fixed and the City of Oxnard still wished to proceed with the project, then a proposed development would have to be submitted to the voters for approval.  
  
Measure V was a citizen initiative.
+
==Ballot question==
  
The Oxnard Traffic Initiative states that all intersections within a five-mile radius of a proposed development must be fixed before a project can be approved. If the intersections are not fixed and the City of Oxnard still wishes to proceed with the project, then the proposed development would have to be submitted to the voters for approval.
+
{{Q box |
 
+
  text = '''Measure V:''' "Shall portions of the Oxnard 2020 General Plan be amended to prohibit residential development of five units or larger, or commercial, retail or industrial development in excess of 10,000 square feet, unless every traffic intersection within a five mile radius of the project operates at a minimum level of service C, subject to certain exemptions, limitations and exceptions as stated in the initiative, including approval of the project by the voters?"
==Text of Initiative V==
+
 
+
}}
Measure V asks, "Shall portions of the Oxnard 2020 General Plan be amended to prohibit residential development of five units or larger, or commercial, retail or industrial development in excess of 10,000 square feet, unless every traffic intersection within a five mile radius of the project operates at a minimum level of service C, subject to certain exemptions, limitations and exceptions as stated in the initiative, including approval of the project by the voters?"
+
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 19: Line 18:
 
* [http://www.oxnardtrafficinitiative.org/ Vote Yes on Measure V]
 
* [http://www.oxnardtrafficinitiative.org/ Vote Yes on Measure V]
  
{{california}}
+
{{california counties}}
 
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2008]]
 
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2008]]

Revision as of 19:50, 9 December 2012

A City of Oxnard Traffic Initiative, Measure V ballot question was on the November 4, 2008 ballot for voters in the City of Oxnard in Ventura County, where it was defeated.

If Measure V had been approved, it would have required that all intersections within a five-mile radius of a proposed development be fixed before a project could receive approval. If the intersections are not fixed and the City of Oxnard still wished to proceed with the project, then a proposed development would have to be submitted to the voters for approval.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Measure V: "Shall portions of the Oxnard 2020 General Plan be amended to prohibit residential development of five units or larger, or commercial, retail or industrial development in excess of 10,000 square feet, unless every traffic intersection within a five mile radius of the project operates at a minimum level of service C, subject to certain exemptions, limitations and exceptions as stated in the initiative, including approval of the project by the voters?"[1]

See also

External links


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found