Difference between revisions of "City of Richmond Tax on Soda, Measure N (November 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (moved City of Richmond Tax on Soda (November 2012) to City of Richmond Tax on Soda, Measure N (November 2012): Text replace - "City of Richmond Tax on Soda (November 2012)" to "City of Richmond Tax on Soda, Measure N (November 2012)")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''City of Richmond "Soda Tax" ballot measure''' is on the {{nov06ca2012}} for voters in the City of Richmond in {{contra costa}}.<ref name=tax>[http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_20636385/richmond-place-soda-tax-november-ballot ''Contra Costa Times'', "Richmond to place 'soda tax' on November ballot", May 16, 2012]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}A '''City of Richmond "Soda Tax" ballot measure, Measure N''' is on the {{nov06ca2012}} for voters in the City of Richmond in {{contra costa}}.<ref name=tax>[http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_20636385/richmond-place-soda-tax-november-ballot ''Contra Costa Times'', "Richmond to place 'soda tax' on November ballot", May 16, 2012]</ref>
  
The measure, if approved by the city's voters, will impose a "business license fee" of 1 cent per ounce on sugar-sweetened beverages sold within city limits. This will mean that consumers would pay 12 cents more for the average can of pop than they currently pay.<ref name=tax/>
+
Measure N, if approved by the city's voters, will impose a "business license fee" of 1 cent per ounce on sugar-sweetened beverages sold within city limits. This will mean that consumers would pay 12 cents more for the average can of pop than they currently pay.<ref name=tax/>
  
A companion measure will also be on the ballot. That measure is an advisory measure asking if the proceeds of the tax should be used for sports and health education programs "aimed at local youths."
+
A companion measure, Measure O, is also be on the ballot. Measure O is an advisory measure asking if the proceeds of the tax should be used for sports and health education programs "aimed at local youths."
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
Line 9: Line 9:
 
City council member Jeff Ritterman wrote the language for the measure and is its chief spokesperson. A former chief of cardiology at Kaiser Richmond Medical Center, he says, "I'm in this to win this."<ref name=tax/>
 
City council member Jeff Ritterman wrote the language for the measure and is its chief spokesperson. A former chief of cardiology at Kaiser Richmond Medical Center, he says, "I'm in this to win this."<ref name=tax/>
  
==Text of measure==
+
==Opposition==
  
===Tax vote===
+
Kris Hunt, the executive director of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, is opposed to Measure N. She says, "If childhood obesity is the target, banning soda from schools altogether would be a better tactic."<ref>[http://cclawyer.cccba.org/2012/09/richmonds-soda-tax-that-isnt/ ''Contra Costa Lawyer'', "Richmond’s “Soda Tax” That Isn’t", September 1, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Text of measures==
 +
 
 +
===Measure N===
  
 
{{Q box |
 
{{Q box |
   text = "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license fee of one (1) cent per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage served, provided, or traded by businesses in the City?"
+
   text = '''Measure N:''' "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license fee of one (1) cent per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage served, provided, or traded by businesses in the City?"
 
   
 
   
 
}}
 
}}
  
===Advisory measure===
+
===Measure O===
  
 
{{Q box |
 
{{Q box |
   text = "Should the proceeds of any business license fee measured by the serving, providing, or trading of sugar-sweetened beverages be used to: have more after school sports programs, make them less expensive and provide adequate sports fields; allow healthier school meals, nutrition classes and cooking classes; provide medical care for children with diabetes who can’t afford care; and support other worthy projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity?"
+
   text = '''Measure O:''' "Should the proceeds of any business license fee measured by the serving, providing, or trading of sugar-sweetened beverages be used to: have more after school sports programs, make them less expensive and provide adequate sports fields; allow healthier school meals, nutrition classes and cooking classes; provide medical care for children with diabetes who can’t afford care; and support other worthy projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity?"
 
   
 
   
 
}}
 
}}
Line 27: Line 31:
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
  
The "soda tax" was placed on the ballot by a 5-2 vote of the Richmond City Council.<ref name=tax/>
+
Measure N was placed on the ballot by a 5-2 vote of the Richmond City Council.<ref name=tax/>
  
 
City council members Nat Bates and Corky Booze voted against referring the measure to the ballot. Bates said at the time of the vote, "I can't see this ballot measure passing. People are fed up with the taxes."<ref name=tax/>
 
City council members Nat Bates and Corky Booze voted against referring the measure to the ballot. Bates said at the time of the vote, "I can't see this ballot measure passing. People are fed up with the taxes."<ref name=tax/>

Revision as of 07:15, 6 September 2012

A City of Richmond "Soda Tax" ballot measure, Measure N is on the November 6, 2012 ballot for voters in the City of Richmond in Contra Costa County.[1]

Measure N, if approved by the city's voters, will impose a "business license fee" of 1 cent per ounce on sugar-sweetened beverages sold within city limits. This will mean that consumers would pay 12 cents more for the average can of pop than they currently pay.[1]

A companion measure, Measure O, is also be on the ballot. Measure O is an advisory measure asking if the proceeds of the tax should be used for sports and health education programs "aimed at local youths."

Support

City council member Jeff Ritterman wrote the language for the measure and is its chief spokesperson. A former chief of cardiology at Kaiser Richmond Medical Center, he says, "I'm in this to win this."[1]

Opposition

Kris Hunt, the executive director of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, is opposed to Measure N. She says, "If childhood obesity is the target, banning soda from schools altogether would be a better tactic."[2]

Text of measures

Measure N

The question on the ballot:

Measure N: "Shall an ordinance be adopted to impose a business license fee of one (1) cent per ounce of sugar-sweetened beverage served, provided, or traded by businesses in the City?"[3]

Measure O

The question on the ballot:

Measure O: "Should the proceeds of any business license fee measured by the serving, providing, or trading of sugar-sweetened beverages be used to: have more after school sports programs, make them less expensive and provide adequate sports fields; allow healthier school meals, nutrition classes and cooking classes; provide medical care for children with diabetes who can’t afford care; and support other worthy projects to prevent and treat diabetes and childhood obesity?"[3]

Path to the ballot

Measure N was placed on the ballot by a 5-2 vote of the Richmond City Council.[1]

City council members Nat Bates and Corky Booze voted against referring the measure to the ballot. Bates said at the time of the vote, "I can't see this ballot measure passing. People are fed up with the taxes."[1]

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Contra Costa Times, "Richmond to place 'soda tax' on November ballot", May 16, 2012
  2. Contra Costa Lawyer, "Richmond’s “Soda Tax” That Isn’t", September 1, 2012
  3. 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Flag of California.png

This article about a local California ballot measure is a stub. You can help people learn about California's local ballot measures by expanding it.