Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "City of San Marcos Voter Approval of Zoning Changes, Propositions N and O (November 2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '<div style="float:right; margin:0 0 1em 1em;">__TOC__</div>' to '{{TOCnestright}}')
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCnestright}}
+
{{TOCnestright}}Two ballot measures, '''Propositions N and O''', pertaining to '''land use issues in the City of San Marcos''', were on the [[November 4, 2008 ballot measures in California|November 4, 2008 ballot]] for voters in the City of San Marcos in [[San Diego County, California ballot measures#November 4|San Diego County]], California.
'''Propositions N and O''', or the '''San Marcos land use propositions''', appeared on the [[November 4, 2008 ballot measures in California|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Diego County, California ballot measures|San Diego County]], California for voters in the city of San Marcos.
+
  
'''Prop N was approved with 69% of the vote, and Prop O was defeated with 36.95% of the vote.'''
+
Proposition N was '''approved''' and Proposition O was '''defeated.'''
  
'''Proposition N''' says, "Shall ordinance No. 2006-1258, adopted by the City Council establishing the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone, be approved by the voters of the City of San Marcos and be further amended to require ratification by the voters of the City for any future modifications?"
+
'''Proposition N''' authorized development of the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone.
  
'''Proposition O''' is also known as the '''San Marcos Growth Management and Neighborhood Protection Act'''. It says, "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Marcos General Plan to require voter approval of certain general plan amendments modifying or changing land use categories or designations?"
+
'''Proposition O''', also known as the '''San Marcos Growth Management and Neighborhood Protection Act''', if it had been approved, would have required voter pre-approval of most changes to the city's zoning and land use designations. Proposition O was similar to one that Escondido voters approved in 1998.
  
Proposition O is similar to one that Escondido voters approved in 1998, called Proposition S.
+
==Proposition N==
  
==Support for O==
+
===Election results===
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition N
 +
| yes = 16,782
 +
| yespct = 68.8
 +
| no = 7,610
 +
| nopct = 31.2
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50
 +
}}
 +
: ''These final, certified, results are from the [http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/voters/Eng/archive/200811bull.pdf San Diego County elections office]''.
  
The group supporting '''O''' is called the '''San Marcos Chamber of Citizens'''.
+
===Ballot question===
  
==Opposition to O==
+
{{Q box |
 +
  text = '''PROPOSITION N:''' "Shall ordinance No. 2006-1258, adopted by the City Council establishing the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone, be approved by the voters of the City of San Marcos and be further amended to require ratification by the voters of the City for any future modifications?"
 +
 
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
==Proposition O==
 +
 
 +
===Election results===
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition O
 +
| yes = 9,890
 +
| yespct = 37.35
 +
| no = 16,589
 +
| nopct = 62.65
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50
 +
}}
 +
: ''These final, certified, results are from the [http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/voters/Eng/archive/200811bull.pdf San Diego County elections office]''.
 +
 
 +
===Support===
 +
 
 +
The group supporting '''O''' was called the '''San Marcos Chamber of Citizens'''.
 +
 
 +
===Opposition===
  
 
Those opposed to Measure O formed an opposition committee called '''San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers'''.  Through October 9, they had assembled over $90,000 to spend on the campaign, versus the approximately $2,000 raised by Measure O's supporters.<ref>[http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/10/08/news/inland/san_marcos/z53b7351242eb3450882574dd00087593.txt ''North County Times'', "Reports show 'No on O' campaign has spent more than $90K so far", October 8, 2008]</ref>
 
Those opposed to Measure O formed an opposition committee called '''San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers'''.  Through October 9, they had assembled over $90,000 to spend on the campaign, versus the approximately $2,000 raised by Measure O's supporters.<ref>[http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/10/08/news/inland/san_marcos/z53b7351242eb3450882574dd00087593.txt ''North County Times'', "Reports show 'No on O' campaign has spent more than $90K so far", October 8, 2008]</ref>
Line 20: Line 56:
 
Escondido Mayor Lori Holt Pfeiler and Councilman Dick Daniels were opposed to Measure O, saying that it is "impractical and harm the city's progress."<ref>[http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080926/news_1mc26smpropo.html ''San Diego Union Tribune'', "Pair lend support to anti-O group", September 26, 2008]</ref>
 
Escondido Mayor Lori Holt Pfeiler and Councilman Dick Daniels were opposed to Measure O, saying that it is "impractical and harm the city's progress."<ref>[http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080926/news_1mc26smpropo.html ''San Diego Union Tribune'', "Pair lend support to anti-O group", September 26, 2008]</ref>
  
Others in opposition to O are:
+
Others in opposition to O were:
  
 
* San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers
 
* San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers
Line 30: Line 66:
 
* Deputy Sheriffs Association of San Diego County
 
* Deputy Sheriffs Association of San Diego County
 
* Karen Haynes, President, California State University, San Marcos
 
* Karen Haynes, President, California State University, San Marcos
 +
 +
===Ballot question===
 +
 +
{{Q box |
 +
  text = '''PROPOSITION O:''' "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Marcos General Plan to require voter approval of certain general plan amendments modifying or changing land use categories or designations?"
 +
 +
}}
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 47: Line 90:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
{{california}}
+
{{california counties}}
  
[[Category:California 2008 local ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2008]]

Revision as of 09:04, 22 December 2012

Two ballot measures, Propositions N and O, pertaining to land use issues in the City of San Marcos, were on the November 4, 2008 ballot for voters in the City of San Marcos in San Diego County, California.

Proposition N was approved and Proposition O was defeated.

Proposition N authorized development of the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone.

Proposition O, also known as the San Marcos Growth Management and Neighborhood Protection Act, if it had been approved, would have required voter pre-approval of most changes to the city's zoning and land use designations. Proposition O was similar to one that Escondido voters approved in 1998.

Proposition N

Election results

Proposition N
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 16,782 68.8%
No7,61031.2%
These final, certified, results are from the San Diego County elections office.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

PROPOSITION N: "Shall ordinance No. 2006-1258, adopted by the City Council establishing the Ridgeline Protection & Management Overlay Zone, be approved by the voters of the City of San Marcos and be further amended to require ratification by the voters of the City for any future modifications?"

Proposition O

Election results

Proposition O
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No16,58962.65%
Yes 9,890 37.35%
These final, certified, results are from the San Diego County elections office.

Support

The group supporting O was called the San Marcos Chamber of Citizens.

Opposition

Those opposed to Measure O formed an opposition committee called San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers. Through October 9, they had assembled over $90,000 to spend on the campaign, versus the approximately $2,000 raised by Measure O's supporters.[1]

Escondido Mayor Lori Holt Pfeiler and Councilman Dick Daniels were opposed to Measure O, saying that it is "impractical and harm the city's progress."[2]

Others in opposition to O were:

  • San Marcos Association of Residents and Taxpayers
  • San Diego County Taxpayers Association
  • San Marcos Chamber of Commerce
  • San Marcos Economic Development Corporation
  • San Marcos Firefighters Association
  • San Marcos Mobilehome Residents Association
  • Deputy Sheriffs Association of San Diego County
  • Karen Haynes, President, California State University, San Marcos

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

PROPOSITION O: "Shall an ordinance be adopted amending the San Marcos General Plan to require voter approval of certain general plan amendments modifying or changing land use categories or designations?"

See also

External links

References