Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Difference between revisions of "City of Santa Barbara Building Heights Initiative, Measure B (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Opposition)
(13 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Save El Pueblo.png|right|175px]]{{tnr}}A '''Santa Barbara Building Heights Initiative, Measure B''' will be on the [[November 3, 2009 ballot measures in California|November 3, 2009 ballot]] in [[Santa Barbara County, California ballot measures|Santa Barbara County]] for voters in the City of Santa Barbara.
+
[[File:Save El Pueblo.png|right|175px]]{{tnr}}A '''City of Santa Barbara Building Heights Initiative, Measure B''' ballot question was on the [[November 3, 2009 ballot measures in California#Santa Barbara|November 3, 2009 ballot]] for voters in the City of Santa Barbara in [[Santa Barbara County, California ballot measures#November 3|Santa Barbara County]], where it was '''defeated.'''<ref>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/110309_santa_barbara_measure_b_fails/ ''Nooz Hawk'', "Voters say "no" to Measure B", November 4, 2009]</ref>
  
If Measure B is approved, it will require that buildings in the historic downtown area of Santa Barbara not exceed 40 feet, and that other buildings in commercial areas not exceed 45 feet. The current height limit allowed by the city charter is 60 feet.<ref name=hofer>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/072809_santa_barbara_building_heights_lawsuit/ ''Noozhawk'', "Architect Sues Proponents of Measure to Lower City’s Building Heights", July 28, 2009]</ref>
+
If Measure B had been approved, it would have required that buildings in the historic downtown area of Santa Barbara not exceed 40 feet, and that other buildings in commercial areas not exceed 45 feet. The current height limit allowed by the city charter is 60 feet.<ref name=hofer>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/072809_santa_barbara_building_heights_lawsuit/ ''Noozhawk'', "Architect Sues Proponents of Measure to Lower City’s Building Heights", July 28, 2009]</ref>
  
11,500 signatures were collected to qualify Measure B for the ballot by "Save El Pueblo Viejo"Three new mixed-use developments on lower Chapala Street led to the initiative.  Bill Mahan, who is a leader of the movement to get Measure B passed, said that he and other slow-growth advocates are worried about "the canyonization" of Chapala Street. They express their concern that the town's historical flavor is threatened.<ref>[http://www.independent.com/news/2009/jul/31/b-building-height/ ''Santa Barbara Independent'', "B is for Building Height", August 1, 2009]</ref>
+
11,500 signatures were collected to qualify Measure B for the ballot by "Save El Pueblo Viejo." Three new mixed-use developments on lower Chapala Street led to the initiative.  Bill Mahan, who was a leader of the movement to get Measure B passed, said that he and other slow-growth advocates were worried about "the canyonization" of Chapala Street. They expressed their concern that the town's historical flavor is threatened.<ref>[http://www.independent.com/news/2009/jul/31/b-building-height/ ''Santa Barbara Independent'', "B is for Building Height", August 1, 2009]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Election results==
 +
 
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Measure B
 +
| yes = 10,444
 +
| yespct = 46.0
 +
| no = 12,237
 +
| nopct = 54.0
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50.0
 +
}}
 +
:''These final, certified, results are from the [http://www.sbcvote.com/Elections/GeneralElections.aspx Santa Barbara County elections office].''
  
 
==Supporters==
 
==Supporters==
  
* Mayoral candidate Dale Francisco supports Measure B.<ref>[http://www.independent.com/news/2009/aug/20/how-now-bow-wow/ ''Santa Barbara Independent'', "How Now, Bow-Wow", August 20, 2009]</ref>
+
* Mayoral candidate Dale Francisco supported Measure B.<ref>[http://www.independent.com/news/2009/aug/20/how-now-bow-wow/ ''Santa Barbara Independent'', "How Now, Bow-Wow", August 20, 2009]</ref>
 
* City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self.<ref name=nooz/>
 
* City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self.<ref name=nooz/>
 
* Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.<ref name=nooz/>
 
* Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.<ref name=nooz/>
Line 17: Line 32:
 
==Opposition==
 
==Opposition==
 
[[File:No on Measure B.jpg|right]]
 
[[File:No on Measure B.jpg|right]]
A "No on Measure B" coalition has formed, led by Debbie Cox Bultan.  The "No on B" coalition supports the lawsuit, saying, "We are pleased that a local expert with unsurpassed qualifications has stepped up and challenged the misrepresentations used by the proponents of Measure B. The community debate about our future is not and has never been about so-called ‘high-rise’ development. This detracts from the real conversation that should be happening about how we can best preserve our community character, protect our environment and provide housing for working families."<ref name=hofer/>
+
A "No on Measure B" coalition formed. It was led by Debbie Cox Bultan.  The "No on B" coalition supported the lawsuit, saying, "We are pleased that a local expert with unsurpassed qualifications has stepped up and challenged the misrepresentations used by the proponents of Measure B. The community debate about our future is not and has never been about so-called ‘high-rise’ development. This detracts from the real conversation that should be happening about how we can best preserve our community character, protect our environment and provide housing for working families."<ref name=hofer/>
  
The Community Environmental Council, the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation and PUEBLO are opposed to the initiative.
+
The Community Environmental Council, the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation and PUEBLO were opposed to Measure B.
  
Arguments made against Measure B include:
+
Arguments made against Measure B included:
  
* 35% of Santa Barbara’s historic buildings are taller than 40 feet, according to Mickey Flacks. Flacks is the SB4All co-chairwoman and an affordable housing advocate. She said, “This is not a town of two-story, flat-roofed buildings."<ref name=no>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/081809_opponents_form_united_front_against_building_height_initiative/ ''Noozhawk'', "Opponents Form United Front Against Santa Barbara’s Building-Height Initiative", August 18, 2009]</ref>
+
* 35% of Santa Barbara’s historic buildings are taller than 40 feet, according to Mickey Flacks. Flacks is the SB4All co-chairwoman and an affordable housing advocate. She said, "This is not a town of two-story, flat-roofed buildings."<ref name=no>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/081809_opponents_form_united_front_against_building_height_initiative/ ''Noozhawk'', "Opponents Form United Front Against Santa Barbara’s Building-Height Initiative", August 18, 2009]</ref>
* Architect Joe Andrulaitis said that many of Santa Barbara's architecturally significant buildings wouldn't conform to the new requirement and future great buildings would not get built if Measure B passes.<ref name=no/>
+
* Architect Joe Andrulaitis said that many of Santa Barbara's architecturally significant buildings wouldn't conform to the new requirement and future great buildings would not get built if Measure B passed.<ref name=no/>
 
* Buildings that wouldn't conform to the proposed height limit include many theaters, hotels, churches, and government buildings including the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Arlington Theatre and Trinity Episcopal Church.
 
* Buildings that wouldn't conform to the proposed height limit include many theaters, hotels, churches, and government buildings including the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Arlington Theatre and Trinity Episcopal Church.
 
* Architect Detty Peikert said Measure B would contribute to urban sprawl.<ref name=no/>
 
* Architect Detty Peikert said Measure B would contribute to urban sprawl.<ref name=no/>
* Dave Davis of the Community Environmental Council said that Santa Barbara's carbon footprint will increase if Measure B passes.
+
* Dave Davis of the Community Environmental Council said that Santa Barbara's carbon footprint would increase if Measure B passes.
 
* Michael Holliday, an architect and Santa Barbara Region Chamber of Commerce member, said that if Measure B passes, hundreds of millions of dollars would be lost in property values.
 
* Michael Holliday, an architect and Santa Barbara Region Chamber of Commerce member, said that if Measure B passes, hundreds of millions of dollars would be lost in property values.
 +
* Karen Telleen-Lawton said that Measure B "encourages the sprawl that defines our immense neighbor to the east, the City of Angels. It exacerbates the problem of affordable housing, thwarts the goals of alternative transportation and increases pollution."<ref>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/102409_karen_telleen-lawton_measure_b_lacks_sustainability/ ''Noozhawk'', "Karen Telleen-Lawton: Measure B Lacks Sustainability", October 26, 2009]</ref>
  
Other opponents include:
+
Other opponents included:
  
* Mayoral candidate Isaac Garrett. Garrett is a long-time leader in the NAACP.<ref name=outsiders/>
+
* Mayoral candidate Isaac Garrett. Garrett is a long-time leader in the NAACP.<ref name=outsiders/>
 
* City council candidate Bonnie Raisin.<ref name=outsiders/>
 
* City council candidate Bonnie Raisin.<ref name=outsiders/>
 
* City council candidate Lane Anderson.<ref name=outsiders/>
 
* City council candidate Lane Anderson.<ref name=outsiders/>
 +
* Santa Barbara architect Barry Berkus, who said, "The citizens who are in support of Measure B feel they are helping preserve the Santa Barbara we love, when in fact they are helping to destroy it. In a recent meeting, proponents of Measure B, when asked what the city would be like if the citizens started to move away, said that tourism could support the downtown. Some of our citizens believe this is healthy. In other words, those behind Measure B imagine a city frozen in time, without an eye to the future, with no heed to the principles of sustainability or livability."<ref>[http://www.independent.com/news/2009/oct/14/b-boring/ ''The Santa Barbara Independent'', "B Is for Boring, Measure B Would Destroy Diversity of Future Santa Barbara", October 14, 2009]</ref>
  
 
==Campaign events==
 
==Campaign events==
Line 40: Line 57:
 
===Push-poll===
 
===Push-poll===
  
Supporters of Measure B held a news conference on Friday, September 25 on the steps of City Hall to strenuously object to push-polling, a campaign tactic they believe Measure B opponents are sponsoring.<ref>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/092509_measure_b_push_polling/ ''Noozhawk'', "Measure B Backers Decry Alleged Push-Poll Tactics from the Other Side", September 25, 2009]</ref>
+
Supporters of Measure B held a news conference on Friday, September 25 on the steps of City Hall to strenuously object to push-polling, a campaign tactic they believed Measure B opponents are sponsoring.<ref>[http://www.noozhawk.com/local_news/article/092509_measure_b_push_polling/ ''Noozhawk'', "Measure B Backers Decry Alleged Push-Poll Tactics from the Other Side", September 25, 2009]</ref>
  
City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self, who support Measure B, received the questionable calls.  So did Measure B supporters Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.<ref name=nooz/>
+
City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self, who supported Measure B, received the questionable calls.  So did Measure B supporters Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.<ref name=nooz/>
  
 
Push-polling is a campaign tactic where a telephone caller represents him or herself as conducting a neutral public opinion poll but then asks questions that convey a negative view of one side of the issue.  The purpose of a push-poll is not to measure public opinion, but to give the caller a opportunity to convey information favorable to the interest of whoever is paying for the call.   
 
Push-polling is a campaign tactic where a telephone caller represents him or herself as conducting a neutral public opinion poll but then asks questions that convey a negative view of one side of the issue.  The purpose of a push-poll is not to measure public opinion, but to give the caller a opportunity to convey information favorable to the interest of whoever is paying for the call.   
Line 54: Line 71:
 
===Lawsuit===
 
===Lawsuit===
  
Architect Brian Hofer filed a lawsuit in late July against the five people who signed the "Argument in Favor of Measure B" for the official voter guide.<ref>[http://saveelpuebloviejo.org/ballot.html ''Argument in Favor of Measure B'']</ref>  The lawsuit challenges their repetitive use of the word "high rise" to describe what they think Measure B would prohibit.  According to Hofer, California building codes give a precise legal meaning to "high rise", and that precise legal meaning is a building that is over 75 feet in height.  Since the Santa Barbara City Charter already prohibits any building height over 60 feet, Hofer says that the ballot language is therefore misleading.<ref name=hofer/>
+
Architect Brian Hofer filed a lawsuit in late July against the five people who signed the "Argument in Favor of Measure B" for the official voter guide.<ref>[http://saveelpuebloviejo.org/ballot.html ''Argument in Favor of Measure B'']</ref>  The lawsuit challenged their repetitive use of the word "high rise" to describe what they think Measure B would prohibit.  According to Hofer, California building codes give a precise legal meaning to "high rise", and that precise legal meaning is a building that is over 75 feet in height.  Since the Santa Barbara City Charter already prohibits any building height over 60 feet, Hofer says that the ballot language is therefore misleading.<ref name=hofer/>
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{submit a link}}
 +
* [http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/SBCityVote2009/ Election results]
 
* [http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/Resident/SB_City_Vote/ City of Santa Barbara elections website]
 
* [http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/Resident/SB_City_Vote/ City of Santa Barbara elections website]
 
* [http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/7B9E5964-E922-4067-BDCA-06A86004BDF3/0/MeasureB2009.pdf Full text of Measure B]
 
* [http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/7B9E5964-E922-4067-BDCA-06A86004BDF3/0/MeasureB2009.pdf Full text of Measure B]
Line 67: Line 85:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
{{california}}
+
{{california counties}}
  
[[Category:Zoning, land use and development, California, 2009]]
+
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2009]]

Revision as of 10:33, 5 February 2013

Save El Pueblo.png
A City of Santa Barbara Building Heights Initiative, Measure B ballot question was on the November 3, 2009 ballot for voters in the City of Santa Barbara in Santa Barbara County, where it was defeated.[1]

If Measure B had been approved, it would have required that buildings in the historic downtown area of Santa Barbara not exceed 40 feet, and that other buildings in commercial areas not exceed 45 feet. The current height limit allowed by the city charter is 60 feet.[2]

11,500 signatures were collected to qualify Measure B for the ballot by "Save El Pueblo Viejo." Three new mixed-use developments on lower Chapala Street led to the initiative. Bill Mahan, who was a leader of the movement to get Measure B passed, said that he and other slow-growth advocates were worried about "the canyonization" of Chapala Street. They expressed their concern that the town's historical flavor is threatened.[3]

Election results

Measure B
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No12,23754.0%
Yes 10,444 46.0%
These final, certified, results are from the Santa Barbara County elections office.

Supporters

  • Mayoral candidate Dale Francisco supported Measure B.[4]
  • City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self.[5]
  • Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.[5]
  • Texas developer Randall Von Wolfswinkel, president of First Texas Homes, who has contributed $30,000 to pro-Measure B groups and $8,000 to city council candidates who support Measure B.[5]
  • Homeless advocate Bob Hansen.[6]
  • City council candidate Dr. John Gibbs.[6]
  • City council candidate Justin Tevis.[6]

Opposition

No on Measure B.jpg

A "No on Measure B" coalition formed. It was led by Debbie Cox Bultan. The "No on B" coalition supported the lawsuit, saying, "We are pleased that a local expert with unsurpassed qualifications has stepped up and challenged the misrepresentations used by the proponents of Measure B. The community debate about our future is not and has never been about so-called ‘high-rise’ development. This detracts from the real conversation that should be happening about how we can best preserve our community character, protect our environment and provide housing for working families."[2]

The Community Environmental Council, the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation and PUEBLO were opposed to Measure B.

Arguments made against Measure B included:

  • 35% of Santa Barbara’s historic buildings are taller than 40 feet, according to Mickey Flacks. Flacks is the SB4All co-chairwoman and an affordable housing advocate. She said, "This is not a town of two-story, flat-roofed buildings."[7]
  • Architect Joe Andrulaitis said that many of Santa Barbara's architecturally significant buildings wouldn't conform to the new requirement and future great buildings would not get built if Measure B passed.[7]
  • Buildings that wouldn't conform to the proposed height limit include many theaters, hotels, churches, and government buildings including the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Arlington Theatre and Trinity Episcopal Church.
  • Architect Detty Peikert said Measure B would contribute to urban sprawl.[7]
  • Dave Davis of the Community Environmental Council said that Santa Barbara's carbon footprint would increase if Measure B passes.
  • Michael Holliday, an architect and Santa Barbara Region Chamber of Commerce member, said that if Measure B passes, hundreds of millions of dollars would be lost in property values.
  • Karen Telleen-Lawton said that Measure B "encourages the sprawl that defines our immense neighbor to the east, the City of Angels. It exacerbates the problem of affordable housing, thwarts the goals of alternative transportation and increases pollution."[8]

Other opponents included:

  • Mayoral candidate Isaac Garrett. Garrett is a long-time leader in the NAACP.[6]
  • City council candidate Bonnie Raisin.[6]
  • City council candidate Lane Anderson.[6]
  • Santa Barbara architect Barry Berkus, who said, "The citizens who are in support of Measure B feel they are helping preserve the Santa Barbara we love, when in fact they are helping to destroy it. In a recent meeting, proponents of Measure B, when asked what the city would be like if the citizens started to move away, said that tourism could support the downtown. Some of our citizens believe this is healthy. In other words, those behind Measure B imagine a city frozen in time, without an eye to the future, with no heed to the principles of sustainability or livability."[9]

Campaign events

Push-poll

Supporters of Measure B held a news conference on Friday, September 25 on the steps of City Hall to strenuously object to push-polling, a campaign tactic they believed Measure B opponents are sponsoring.[10]

City Council candidates Frank Hotchkiss and Michael Self, who supported Measure B, received the questionable calls. So did Measure B supporters Gil Barry and Richard St. Clair.[5]

Push-polling is a campaign tactic where a telephone caller represents him or herself as conducting a neutral public opinion poll but then asks questions that convey a negative view of one side of the issue. The purpose of a push-poll is not to measure public opinion, but to give the caller a opportunity to convey information favorable to the interest of whoever is paying for the call.

Some of the questions asked in the alleged push-poll were "Are you aware that if Measure B passes that the city will get less affordable housing?” and “Are you aware if Measure B passes, it will affect Cottage Hospital?”[5]

According to the Santa Barbara City Charter, a phone caller is supposed to identify the name of the candidates or committee paying for the communications, but several of those who received the call, who asked that the caller provide that information, found that the pollster refused to identify the source of the calls.[5]

Richard St. Clair said at the September 25 news conference that he had been called three times in 10 days by the push-pollsters, who refused to identify themselves on all three occasions.

Lawsuit

Architect Brian Hofer filed a lawsuit in late July against the five people who signed the "Argument in Favor of Measure B" for the official voter guide.[11] The lawsuit challenged their repetitive use of the word "high rise" to describe what they think Measure B would prohibit. According to Hofer, California building codes give a precise legal meaning to "high rise", and that precise legal meaning is a building that is over 75 feet in height. Since the Santa Barbara City Charter already prohibits any building height over 60 feet, Hofer says that the ballot language is therefore misleading.[2]

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References