Difference between revisions of "City of Saratoga Building Heights Limit, Measure Q (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Supporters)
(Opponents)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Opponents==
 
==Opponents==
  
The campaign for a "no" vote on Measure Q had raised about $36,000 for their campaign through mid-October.  The California Association of Realtors contributed about $25,000 of that total.<ref>[http://www.mercurynews.com/elections/ci_16471942?source=rss ''San Jose Mercury News'', "Outside money flows into Saratoga's Measure Q", October 31, 2010]</ref>
+
The campaign for a "no" vote on Measure Q had raised about $36,000 for their campaign through mid-October.  The California Association of Realtors contributed about $25,000 of that total.<ref name=saratoga>[http://www.mercurynews.com/elections/ci_16471942?source=rss ''San Jose Mercury News'', "Outside money flows into Saratoga's Measure Q", October 31, 2010]</ref>
  
 
==Ballot question==
 
==Ballot question==

Revision as of 08:27, 31 October 2010

A City of Saratoga Building Heights Limit, Measure Q ballot proposition is on the November 2, 2010 ballot in Santa Clara County.

Supporters

Supporters of Measure Q say:

"In April, 2010, the City approved Ordinance #277, removing the 2-story height restriction on commercial buildings that had been in place for the 50+ year history of Saratoga!
Very Few Saratogans knew this was happening.
YES Measure Q will restore Saratoga’s history 2 story commercial height limit.

Jeff Schwartz, a leader in the "Yes on Q" campaign, says, "This is an issue about the future of the community."[1]

Opponents

The campaign for a "no" vote on Measure Q had raised about $36,000 for their campaign through mid-October. The California Association of Realtors contributed about $25,000 of that total.[1]

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Measure Q: Shall the City of Saratoga adopt an ordinance setting a two-story limit for buildings on land in Commercial and Professional and Administrative Office zoning districts in the City and requiring voter approval of any future change to the two-story limit on those lands?[2]

External links


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found