Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 2 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit

Colorado Domestic Partnerships, Referendum I (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 10:29, 8 January 2014 by Josh Altic (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Voting on
Marriage and Family
Wedding rings.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Colorado Domestic Partnerships Act, Referendum I was on the November 7, 2006 ballot in Colorado as a legislatively-referred state statute. It was defeated.

Election results

Referendum I
Defeatedd No806,71752.35%
Yes 734,385 47.65%
Election results from Colorado Secretary of State Elections Department.

Text of measure

Ballot question

The official ballot question read:

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado revised statutes to authorize domestic partnerships, and, in connection therewith, enacting the "Colorado Domestic Partnership Benefits and Responsibilities Act" to extend to same-sex couples in a domestic partnership the benefits, protections, and responsibilities that are granted by Colorado law to spouses, providing the conditions under which a license for a domestic partnership may be issued and the criteria under which a domestic partnership may be dissolved, making provisions for implementation of the act, and providing that a domestic partnership is not a marriage, which consists of the union of one man and one woman?[1][2]


Three groups supported the referendum: Coloradans for Fairness Issue Committee, which spent $5,107,495 advocating for the measure, the Bell Ballot Action group, which spent $5,000, and People for the American Way Voters Alliance of Colorado.

Supporters argued that committed same-sex couples deserve access to the legal protections, responsibilities, and benefits automatically granted to married couples—many of which cannot be accessed through legal documents. Referendum I provides these legal protections while making no change to the legal status of marriage, which consists of the union of one man and one woman.

Supporters also claimed that establishing legal standards of responsibility and a framework for resolving disputes for same-sex couples is in the state's interest. By holding same-sex couples accountable for legal commitments made in raising children, incurring debt, and owning property, domestic partnerships benefit individuals, their families, and the broader community.[3]


In opposition, the Colorado Family Action Issue Committee spent $1,027,777.

Opponents argued that domestic partnerships diminish the significance of marriage for society by reducing marriage to a list of benefits and responsibilities. The benefits given to married couples, they said, are intended to support child rearing by one man and one woman. The state has an interest in restricting recognition and legal protection to these married couples to provide stability for the individuals, their families, and the broader community.

Opponents argued that domestic partnerships unfairly extend benefits to same-sex couples that are not extended to any other two unmarried people. In addition, they said, any of the rights and responsibilities of married couples are already available to any two people willing to make a will, assign power of attorney, or enter into contracts.[3]

Campaign finance

Donors to the campaign for the measure:[4]

  • Coloradans for Fairness Issue Committee: $5,107,495
  • Bell Ballot Action: $5,000
  • People for the American Way Voters Allliance of CO: $100
  • Total: $5,112,595

Donors to the campaign against the measure:

  • Colorado Family Action Issue Committee: 1,027,777
  • Total: $1,027,777
  • Overall Total: $6,140,372

See also

Suggest a link

External links


  1. Secretary of State elections office, 2006 Amendments and Referenda, accessed January 7, 2014
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
  3. 3.0 3.1 2006 Colorado Blue Book
  4. Follow the Money, "Donors"