Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Colorado Religious Freedom Amendment (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{noco2012}}A '''Colorado Religious Freedom Amendment''' did not make the [[Colorado 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012 ballot]] in [[Colorado]] as an {{icafull}}.  
+
{{noco2012}}{{tnr}}A '''Colorado Religious Freedom Amendment''' did not make the [[Colorado 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012 ballot]] in [[Colorado]] as an {{icafull}}.  
  
 
The measure would have banned the state from interfering with freedom of religion. The language of the proposed ballot question mandated that the state government should not burden a person or organization by withholding benefits, assessing penalties or excluding a person or group from government programs or facilities because of religion.<ref> [http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_20122138/groups-propose-religious-freedom-amendment ''Denver Post'', "Groups propose religious freedom amendment", March 8, 2012]</ref>
 
The measure would have banned the state from interfering with freedom of religion. The language of the proposed ballot question mandated that the state government should not burden a person or organization by withholding benefits, assessing penalties or excluding a person or group from government programs or facilities because of religion.<ref> [http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_20122138/groups-propose-religious-freedom-amendment ''Denver Post'', "Groups propose religious freedom amendment", March 8, 2012]</ref>
Line 16: Line 16:
 
On [[BC2012#April|April 4, 2012]] the [[Colorado Secretary of State]]'s office approved the ballot language for the proposed measure and green-lit petition circulation.<ref name="CIApril62012"/>
 
On [[BC2012#April|April 4, 2012]] the [[Colorado Secretary of State]]'s office approved the ballot language for the proposed measure and green-lit petition circulation.<ref name="CIApril62012"/>
  
The measure was withdrawn during [[BC2012#May|May 2012]], with the group's leader citing a "tangled thicket of regulations" that would make their process too difficult.<ref name=thicket>
+
The measure was withdrawn during [[BC2012#May|May 2012]], with the group's leader citing a "tangled thicket of regulations" that would make their process too difficult.<ref name=thicket/>
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
{{submit a link}}
 
{{submit a link}}

Revision as of 10:43, 22 May 2012

Not on Ballot
Proposed allot measures that were not on a ballot
This measure did not or
will not appear on a ballot
A Colorado Religious Freedom Amendment did not make the November 6, 2012 ballot in Colorado as an initiated constitutional amendment.

The measure would have banned the state from interfering with freedom of religion. The language of the proposed ballot question mandated that the state government should not burden a person or organization by withholding benefits, assessing penalties or excluding a person or group from government programs or facilities because of religion.[1]

The proposal was filed by Colorado Springs-based evangelical organization Focus on the Family. The measure was withdrawn during May 2012, with the group's leader citing a "tangled thicket of regulations" that would make their process too difficult.[2][3]

Text of measure

The ballot title read:[4][3]

An amendment to the Colorado Constitution expressing the public policy of the state of Colorado that government may not burden a person’s or religious organization’s freedom of religion.

Path to the ballot

See also: Colorado signature requirements

Supporters of the measure were required to collect at least 85,853 valid signatures by the August 6, 2012 petition drive deadline in order to make the November 6, 2012 general election ballot.

On April 4, 2012 the Colorado Secretary of State's office approved the ballot language for the proposed measure and green-lit petition circulation.[3]

The measure was withdrawn during May 2012, with the group's leader citing a "tangled thicket of regulations" that would make their process too difficult.[2]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

References