Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Douglas County School Levy Override (November 2011)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'A '''Douglas County School Bond Measure''' will be on the November 1, 2011 ballot in [[Douglas County, Colorado ballot measures|D…')
 
m (Text replace - "ategory:School property tax,(.*)]]" to "ategory:Local property tax,$1]] Category:Local school tax,$1 ")
(3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Douglas County School Bond Measure''' will be on the [[November 1, 2011 ballot measures in Colorado|November 1, 2011]] ballot in [[Douglas County, Colorado ballot measures|Douglas County]].
+
A '''Douglas County School Levy Override''' measure was on the [[November 1, 2011 ballot measures in Colorado|November 1, 2011]] ballot in [[Elbert County, Colorado ballot measures|Elbert]] and [[Douglas County, Colorado ballot measures|Douglas Counties]].
  
This measure seeks to issue a levy override for the county schools in order to help pay for performance of teachers at the schools. The levy override would be at a cost of $29 million a year. The purpose of the levy would be to pay those teachers who have higher performance rates in the hopes to encourage excellent teachings in the schools. At a recently held public meeting, residents commented that they would not support such a measure if school vouchers were still in place and most of the money still went to private schools.<ref>[http://www.ourcoloradonews.com/castlerock/news/douglas-county-board-of-education-approves-putting-tax-initiatives-on/article_77cd9b34-d67e-5de2-b71c-179568066ecd.html ''Castle Rock news Press'', "Douglas County Board of Education approves putting tax initiatives on ballot," August 31, 2011]</ref>
+
This measure was '''defeated'''<br>
 +
Douglas
 +
* '''YES''' 21,677 (42.64%)
 +
* '''NO''' 29,159 (57.36%){{defeated}}<ref>[http://www.douglas.co.us/clerk/elections/documents/2011_cumulative.pdf ''Douglas County Clerk'', November Election Results]</ref>
 +
 
 +
Elbert
 +
* '''YES''' 107
 +
* '''NO''' 428 {{Defeated}}<ref>[http://www.elbertcounty-co.gov/index.php ''Elbert County Home'', Unofficial Election Results]</ref>
 +
 
 +
This measure sought to issue a levy override for the county schools in order to help pay for performance of teachers at the schools. The levy override would be at a cost of $29 million a year. The purpose of the levy would have been to pay those teachers who have higher performance rates in the hopes to encourage excellent teachings in the schools. At a recently held public meeting, residents commented that they would not support such a measure if school vouchers were still in place and most of the money still went to private schools.<ref>[http://www.ourcoloradonews.com/castlerock/news/douglas-county-board-of-education-approves-putting-tax-initiatives-on/article_77cd9b34-d67e-5de2-b71c-179568066ecd.html ''Castle Rock news Press'', "Douglas County Board of Education approves putting tax initiatives on ballot," August 31, 2011]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 9: Line 18:
 
{{Colorado}}
 
{{Colorado}}
 
[[Category:Colorado 2011 local ballot measures]]
 
[[Category:Colorado 2011 local ballot measures]]
[[Category:School property tax, Colorado, 2011]]
+
[[Category:Local property tax, Colorado, 2011]]
 +
[[Category:Local school tax, Colorado, 2011]]

Revision as of 16:52, 13 October 2012

A Douglas County School Levy Override measure was on the November 1, 2011 ballot in Elbert and Douglas Counties.

This measure was defeated
Douglas

  • YES 21,677 (42.64%)
  • NO 29,159 (57.36%)Defeatedd[1]

Elbert

  • YES 107
  • NO 428 Defeatedd[2]

This measure sought to issue a levy override for the county schools in order to help pay for performance of teachers at the schools. The levy override would be at a cost of $29 million a year. The purpose of the levy would have been to pay those teachers who have higher performance rates in the hopes to encourage excellent teachings in the schools. At a recently held public meeting, residents commented that they would not support such a measure if school vouchers were still in place and most of the money still went to private schools.[3]

References