Difference between revisions of "Eastpointe City Library Levy Increase (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'A '''Eastpointe City Library Levy Increase''' measure will be on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the city of Eastpointe which is i…')
 
(updated election)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Eastpointe City Library Levy Increase''' measure will be on the [[November 2, 2010 ballot measures in Michigan|November 2, 2010]] ballot in the city of Eastpointe which is in [[Macomb County, Michigan ballot measures|Macomb County]].
+
A '''Eastpointe City Library Levy Increase''' measure was on the [[November 2, 2010 ballot measures in Michigan|November 2, 2010]] ballot in the city of Eastpointe which is in [[Macomb County, Michigan ballot measures|Macomb County]].
  
This measure seeks to add a levy of .1135 mills to the current library tax for a further five years in order to better support operational and maintenance costs of the library.<ref>[http://www.macombcountymi.gov/clerksoffice/pdf/elec-2010-Nov-Proposals.pdf ''Macomb County Elections'', County Proposal List, pg.4]</ref>
+
This measure was '''approved'''
 +
* '''YES''' 5,496 (58.9%){{approved}}
 +
* '''NO''' 3,837 (41.1%)<ref>[http://74.208.45.94/m6/results.html ''Macomb County Elections'', Current Election Results]</ref>
 +
 
 +
This measure sought to add a levy of .1135 mills to the current library tax for a further five years in order to better support operational and maintenance costs of the library.<ref>[http://www.macombcountymi.gov/clerksoffice/pdf/elec-2010-Nov-Proposals.pdf ''Macomb County Elections'', County Proposal List, pg.4]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 09:56, 12 November 2010

A Eastpointe City Library Levy Increase measure was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the city of Eastpointe which is in Macomb County.

This measure was approved

  • YES 5,496 (58.9%)Approveda
  • NO 3,837 (41.1%)[1]

This measure sought to add a levy of .1135 mills to the current library tax for a further five years in order to better support operational and maintenance costs of the library.[2]

References