Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Difference between revisions of "Election analysis, Alaska House of Representatives (2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|- style="color:black;background-color:#E6E6FA"
 
|- style="color:black;background-color:#E6E6FA"
 
| Highest %
 
| Highest %
 +
|- style="color:black;background-color:#00CC99"
 +
| Highest contributions
 +
|- style="color:black;background-color:#FFFF31"
 +
| Lowest contributions
 
|}</td></tr>
 
|}</td></tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
Line 30: Line 34:
 
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Primary
 
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Primary
 
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | General
 
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | General
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Contributions
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 38: Line 43:
 
| align="right" width="130px" | NA  
 
| align="right" width="130px" | NA  
 
| align="right" width="130px" | 67.51%
 
| align="right" width="130px" | 67.51%
 +
| align="right" width="160px" | $12,375
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 46: Line 52:
 
| align="right" | 53.06%  
 
| align="right" | 53.06%  
 
| align="right" | 64.61%
 
| align="right" | 64.61%
 +
| align="right" | $13,755
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 54: Line 61:
 
| align="right" | NA  
 
| align="right" | NA  
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | NA   
 +
| align="right" | $18,605
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 61: Line 69:
 
| align="center" width="110px" | 2008
 
| align="center" width="110px" | 2008
 
| align="right" | NA  
 
| align="right" | NA  
| align="right" | NA
+
| align="right" | NA  
 +
| align="right" | $24,075
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 70: Line 79:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 62.06%
 
| align="right" | 62.06%
 +
| align="right" | $21,572
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 78: Line 88:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 58.16%
 
| align="right" | 58.16%
 +
| align="right" style="background-color:#FFFF31" | 0
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 86: Line 97:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 53.57%
 
| align="right" | 53.57%
 +
| align="right" | $23,977
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 94: Line 106:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 54.80%
 
| align="right" | 54.80%
 +
| align="right" | $29,933
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 102: Line 115:
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | 53.77%
 
| align="right" | 53.77%
 +
| align="right" | $47,320
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 110: Line 124:
 
| align="right" | 54.05%
 
| align="right" | 54.05%
 
| align="right" | 62.88%
 
| align="right" | 62.88%
 +
| align="right" | $37,677
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 118: Line 133:
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | 76.90%
 
| align="right" | 76.90%
 +
| align="right" | $4,053
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 126: Line 142:
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#BDDA57" | 33.65%
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#BDDA57" | 33.65%
 
| align="right" | 62.37%
 
| align="right" | 62.37%
 +
| align="right" | $12,136
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 134: Line 151:
 
| align="right" | 56.17%
 
| align="right" | 56.17%
 
| align="right" | NA   
 
| align="right" | NA   
 +
| align="right" | $20,275
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 141: Line 159:
 
| align="center" width="110px" | 2006
 
| align="center" width="110px" | 2006
 
| align="right" | NA  
 
| align="right" | NA  
| align="right" | NA
+
| align="right" | NA  
 +
| align="right" | $12,416
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 150: Line 169:
 
| align="right" | 65.29%
 
| align="right" | 65.29%
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $13,562
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 158: Line 178:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 78.04%
 
| align="right" | 78.04%
 +
| align="right" | $37,701
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 166: Line 187:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $34,572
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 174: Line 196:
 
| align="right" | 35.84%
 
| align="right" | 35.84%
 
| align="right" | 68.89%
 
| align="right" | 68.89%
 +
| align="right" | $22,810
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 182: Line 205:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#BDDA57" | 52.29%
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#BDDA57" | 52.29%
 +
| align="right" | $57,026
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 190: Line 214:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 68.56%
 
| align="right" | 68.56%
 +
| align="right" | $24,100
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 198: Line 223:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 54.11%
 
| align="right" | 54.11%
 +
| align="right" | $23,307
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 206: Line 232:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $10,230
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 214: Line 241:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $29,845
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 222: Line 250:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $23,890
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 230: Line 259:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 64.76%
 
| align="right" | 64.76%
 +
| align="right" | $26,600
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 238: Line 268:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 71.14%
 
| align="right" | 71.14%
 +
| align="right" | $24,504
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 246: Line 277:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 56.14%
 
| align="right" | 56.14%
 +
| align="right" | $47,390
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 254: Line 286:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 65.06%
 
| align="right" | 65.06%
 +
| align="right" | $32,275
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 262: Line 295:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 55.05%
 
| align="right" | 55.05%
 +
| align="right" | $59,373
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 270: Line 304:
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#E6E6FA" | 74.06%
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#E6E6FA" | 74.06%
 
| align="right" | 58.71%
 
| align="right" | 58.71%
 +
| align="right" | $21,741
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 278: Line 313:
 
| align="right" | 60.12%
 
| align="right" | 60.12%
 
| align="right" | 67.45%
 
| align="right" | 67.45%
 +
| align="right" | $25,264
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 286: Line 322:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 70.41%
 
| align="right" | 70.41%
 +
| align="right" | $74,945
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 294: Line 331:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 76.33%
 
| align="right" | 76.33%
 +
| align="right" | $10,950
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 302: Line 340:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#E6E6FA" | 80.73%
 
| align="right" style="background-color:#E6E6FA" | 80.73%
 +
| align="right" | $32,255
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 310: Line 349:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $14,520
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 318: Line 358:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | 68.00%
 
| align="right" | 68.00%
 +
| align="right" | $4,727
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 326: Line 367:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $10,025
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 334: Line 376:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $14,800
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 342: Line 385:
 
| align="right" | 57.82%
 
| align="right" | 57.82%
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $22,137
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 350: Line 394:
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 
| align="right" | NA
 +
| align="right" | $11,500
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 23:06, 10 April 2011

Legend:
NA = No opponent
First elected in 2010
Longest-serving
Lowest %
Highest %
Highest contributions
Lowest contributions

Primary election:

Of the eventual 40 winning candidates for the Alaska House of Representatives in the Alaska House's 2010 elections, only 9 faced a primary opponent. Eric A. Feige had the lowest primary vote, with 33.65% of the vote in a tight three-way primary. Of those with a primary opponent, Charisse Millett had the highest winning percentage, with 74.06% of the vote.

General election:

26 of the 40 eventual winners faced a general election opponent. Pete Petersen had the lowest winning percentage in the general election, with 52.29% of the vote. Mike Chenault had the highest winning percentage, with 80.73%.

Representative Party District First elected Primary General Contributions
Kyle Johansen Republican Party 1 2006 NA 67.51% $12,375
Peggy Wilson Republican Party 2 2000 53.06% 64.61% $13,755
Beth Kerttula Democratic Party 3 1998 NA NA $18,605
Cathy Munoz Republican Party 4 2008 NA NA $24,075
Bill Thomas Republican Party 5 2004 NA 62.06% $21,572
Alan S. Dick Republican Party 6 2010 NA 58.16% 0
Bob Miller Democratic Party 7 2010 NA 53.57% $23,977
David Guttenberg Democratic Party 8 2002 NA 54.80% $29,933
Scott Kawasaki Democratic Party 9 2006 NA 53.77% $47,320
Steve M. Thompson Republican Party 10 2010 54.05% 62.88% $37,677
Tammie Wilson Republican Party 11 2009 NA 76.90% $4,053
Eric A. Feige Republican Party 12 2010 33.65% 62.37% $12,136
Carl Gatto Republican Party 13 2002 56.17% NA $20,275
Wes Keller Republican Party 14 2006 NA NA $12,416
Mark Neuman Republican Party 15 2004 65.29% NA $13,562
Bill Stoltze Republican Party 16 2002 NA 78.04% $37,701
Anna Fairclough Republican Party 17 2006 NA NA $34,572
Dan Saddler Republican Party 18 2010 35.84% 68.89% $22,810
Pete Petersen Democratic Party 19 2008 NA 52.29% $57,026
Max Gruenberg Democratic Party 20 2002‡‡ NA 68.56% $24,100
Lance Pruitt Republican Party 21 2010 NA 54.11% $23,307
Sharon Cissna Democratic Party 22 1998 NA NA $10,230
Les Gara Democratic Party 23 2002 NA NA $29,845
Berta Gardner Democratic Party 24 2004 NA NA $23,890
Mike Doogan Democratic Party 25 2006 NA 64.76% $26,600
Lindsey Holmes Democratic Party 26 2006 NA 71.14% $24,504
Mia Costello Republican Party 27 2010 NA 56.14% $47,390
Craig Johnson Republican Party 28 2006 NA 65.06% $32,275
Chris Tuck Democratic Party 29 2008 NA 55.05% $59,373
Charisse Millett Republican Party 30 2008 74.06% 58.71% $21,741
Bob Lynn Republican Party 31 2002 60.12% 67.45% $25,264
Mike Hawker Republican Party 32 2002 NA 70.41% $74,945
Kurt Olson Republican Party 33 2004 NA 76.33% $10,950
Mike Chenault Republican Party 34 2000 NA 80.73% $32,255
Paul Seaton Republican Party 35 2002 NA NA $14,520
Alan Austerman Republican Party 36 2008‡‡ NA 68.00% $4,727
Bryce Edgmon Democratic Party 37 2006 NA NA $10,025
Bob Herron Democratic Party 38 2008 NA NA $14,800
Neal Foster Democratic Party 39 2009 57.82% NA $22,137
Reggie Joule Democratic Party 40 1996 NA NA $11,500

Notes

= This representative was first appointed, not elected, in this year.

‡‡ = This representative is serving a second stretch of years, and the year here indicates the time that the second stretch began.