Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.

Difference between revisions of "Florida Waterfront Property Tax Assessment, Amendment 6 (2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Added date to AIT)
m (Added date to AIT)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{sbm update|Month=January 2014|Reason=Needs citation}}
<table style="float: right;">
<table style="float: right;">
<tr valign="top">
<tr valign="top">

Revision as of 17:35, 28 January 2014

Clipboard48.png This ballot measure article needs to be updated.

Voting on Taxes
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Florida Constitution
750px-Flag of Florida.svg.png

The Florida Waterfront Property Tax Assessment Amendment, also known as Amendment 6 was a commission referral on the November 4, 2008 election ballot in Florida, where it was approved.

Election results

Florida Amendment 6 (2008)
Approveda Yes 4,983,313 70.63%

Election Results via: Florida Department of State Division of Elections

Text of measure

The ballot title read:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.


The ballot summary read:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Provides for assessment based upon use of land used predominantly for commercial fishing purposes; land used for vessel launches into waters that are navigable and accessible to the public; marinas and drystacks that are open to the public; and water - dependent marine manufacturing facilities, commercial fishing facilities, and marine vessel construction and repair facilities and their support activities, subject to conditions, limitations, and reasonable definitions specified by general law.[1]

Constitutional changes

The text of the amendment can be read in the ballot pamphlet.



Notable arguments made in support of the measure included:

  • Access to public waterfront areas would more likely remain at current levels rather than continuing to diminish.[2]
  • This measure may reduce property taxes on working waterfront properties and thereby reduce pressure to sell those properties to developers.[2]
  • Amendment 6 would apply a "current use" assessment method for working waterfront property. This would be used in place of a "highest and best use" assessment system, which can mean high assessments for small businesses (e.g., fisheries) if their property could be used for other, more expensive purposes (e.g., luxury condos).[citation needed]



Notable arguments made in opposition to the measure included:

  • Local revenues would suffer.[2]
  • The measure allows the Legislature to define terms and impose conditions and limitations on any tax break working waterfront owners receive.[2]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links