Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Gang of Eight"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Hastert Rule in House)
(Impact on 2014 elections and beyond)
Line 90: Line 90:
  
 
Since the [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] passed its comprehensive immigration reform bill, [[U.S. House|House]] [[Republicans]] have the party on their shoulders: if they can’t pass a bill, it could hurt the [[Republican party|party's]] relationship with Hispanic voters for years to come, and cement the idea that [[Republican party|the party]] is a roadblock to bipartisan legislation.<ref name="closed"/>
 
Since the [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] passed its comprehensive immigration reform bill, [[U.S. House|House]] [[Republicans]] have the party on their shoulders: if they can’t pass a bill, it could hurt the [[Republican party|party's]] relationship with Hispanic voters for years to come, and cement the idea that [[Republican party|the party]] is a roadblock to bipartisan legislation.<ref name="closed"/>
 +
 +
A rare coalition with groups from across the political spectrum are looking for ways to convince member of the [[U.S. House|House]] to act.<ref name="groups">[http://news.yahoo.com/immigration-bill-s-future-in-the-house-150921863.html ''Yahoo'' "Liberal, conservative groups push for immigration bill in the House" Accessed July 10, 2013]</ref> The heads of the conservative American Action Forum, Americans of Tax Reform and the American Conservative Union sent a joint letter to [[Congress|congressional leaders]] calling for passage of a comprehensive bill. Labor groups are dispatching members to congressional offices and running ads in a dozen [[U.S. House|House]] districts.<ref name="groups"/> The Evangelical Immigration Table, a coalition of Christian groups are holding a gathering in Washington D.C. in July 2013.<ref name="groups"/>
  
 
====Notable support for the immigration reform bill====
 
====Notable support for the immigration reform bill====

Revision as of 16:08, 10 July 2013

Portal:Congress
Features of Congress

Background
Federal Election CommissionDemocratic Congressional Campaign CommitteeNational Republican Congressional CommitteeFiling requirements for congressional candidatesClasses of United States SenatorsFilling vacancies in the U.S. SenatePresident Pro Tempore of the SenateUnited States Speaker of the HouseFilibuster

Sessions
113th Congress112th Congress111th Congress110th Congress

Analysis
Lifetime voting recordsNet Worth of United States Senators and RepresentativesStaff salaries of United States Senators and RepresentativesNational Journal vote ratings
The Gang of Eight in the context of Congress has two meanings. Most recently, the Gang of Eight has been used in reference to immigration reform and includes eight of the most influential Senators, with four from each party.[1][2]

Historically it has referred to eight members of Congress: four members, the chair and ranking member, of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate Select Committees on Intelligence and the four leaders of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.[3][4]

The Intelligence Oversight Act of 1980 mandated that the CIA “fully and currently [inform]” Congressional oversight committees of their activities including “any significant anticipated intelligence activity.”[3]

In special cases, the Act authorized the President to brief only the majority and minority leaders of each chamber as well as the chairmen and ranking minority members of the Intelligence Committees. It is this group that is informally known as the "Gang of Eight" of Congress.[3]


Members

U.S. Senate

Within the U.S. Senate, there is a "Gang of Eight" pertaining to immigration reform made up of eight of the most influential senators, with four from each party, including:

113th Congress

Issues

Immigration reform bill

Members of the Senate in early May 2013 started targeting as many as two dozen Republicans for a show-of-force majority, which they believe may be the only way an immigation reform bill will have the momentum to force the U.S. House to act.[3] Proponents of immigration reform are looking for votes beyond the usual moderate senators to ones in conservative strongholds such as Utah, Georgia and Wyoming, and targets because they are retiring, representing agricultural states, anxious to get the issue behind the party, important to persuading skittish U.S. House Republicans, or all of the above.[3][1]

On May 6, 2013 Senators John McCain (R), Chuck Schumer (D), Richard Durbin (D), Robert Menendez (D), Michael Bennet (D), Lindsey Graham (R), Marco Rubio (R), and Jeff Flake (R) unveiled the outlines of their bi-partisan immigration plan.[1][2] The statement of principles was rather broad, but sets forth “four basic pillars”:

  • 1. A “tough but fair path to citizenship . . . .contingent upon securing our borders and tracking whether legal immigrants have left the country as required”;
  • 2. Reform our legal immigration system with a greater eye toward our economic needs;
  • 3. Workplace verification; and
  • 4. Setting up a system for admitting future workers (although the term “guest worker” is not used).[2]

In essence, the eight senators refused to accept the idea that the United States will deport any substantial numbers of illegal immigrants already in the country.[2]

On June 4, 2013 Marco Rubio, who helped to craft the immigration reform bill, announced that based upon the current status of the bill, he would not support it.[5] Rubio made it clear that the bill must be amended to included specific enforcement procedures that will prevent another influx of illegal immigrants, and without that he will not support the bill because it would not pass in the House.[5] Rubio changed his opinion of the bill in an appearance on ABC's "This Week" on June 16, 2013, in which he said that he supports the vast majority of what is in the bill and sees the final legislation resolving his concerns.[6] Rubio spoke of the bill saying, "It's an excellent starting point. And I think 95, 96 percent of the bill is in perfect shape and ready to go. But there are elements that need to be improved."[6]

The House of Representatives passed an amendment defunding President Obama's executive order exempting young illegal immigrants from deportation on June 6, 2013. This was the first immigration-related vote in the House this year. It comes as a test before the Gang of Eight's immigration bill makes it to the House.[7]

Statement from CBO

On June 18, 2013 the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a statement that the Senate Gang of Eight’s immigration bill will significantly reduce the federal budget deficit in its first two decades if it becomes law.[8] In the first ten years, the immigration bill is said to reduce the federal deficit by $175 billion, according to the CBO, by cutting the deficit by $197 billion in the first decade, but implementing the bill would cost about $22 billion. In the second 10-year period, the deficit is said to decrease by an additional $700 billion, according to the CBO.[8]

Cornyn amendment tabled

The amendment proposed by John Cornyn (R) was rejected by the Senate in a roll call vote on June 20, 2013.[9][10] By a 54-43 vote, mostly along party lines, the Senate approved a decision to table the amendment.[10] The amendment would required a 90 percent border apprehension rate, increased surveillance, a biometric exit system and national E-Verify system as prerequisites for newly documented immigrants to gain green-card status.[10]

The Gang of Eight for the most part voted together — with the exception of Marco Rubio, who voted against killing the Cornyn provision.[10] The other three Gang Republicans, Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Jeff Flake of Arizona and John McCain of Arizona, voted to table the Cornyn amendment, as did Rand Paul.[10] Two Democrats, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, joined Republicans to vote against tabling the amendment.[10]

Bill passes Senate

On June 27, 2013 in a late afternoon vote, the Senate voted to approve the immigration reform bill, Senate Bill 744.[11] The bill passed by a vote of 68-to-32, with 14 Republicans voting in favor.[12][11]

Vice President Joe Biden, acting in his constitutional capacity as head of the Senate, took the rare step of presiding over the roll call.[12] During the vote Senators voted from their seats in the chamber, which is also an unusual occurrence.[12]

If enacted, the bill would create a 13-year path to citizenship for most undocumented immigrants, while raising the cap on visas for high skilled workers and establishing a new visa program for low skilled workers on America's farms.[11][12]

A recently added border security amendment, introduced by Sens. John Hoeven (R) of North Dakota and Bob Corker (R) of Tennessee, would require 20,000 more border agents, complete 700 miles of fence along the boundary with Mexico and deploy $3.2 billion in technology upgrades similar to equipment used by U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.[12] The amendment also strengthens eligibility verification and border entry-exit controls.[12]

Most undocumented immigrants would be eligible for permanent residency only after the five conditions have been met and verified by the Department of Homeland Security.[12][11]

Hastert Rule in House

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) on July 8, 2013 ridiculed the House’s strategy of using the “Hastert rule” to pass legislation and said Speaker John Boehner will eventually have to take up the Senate’s immigration bill.[13]

Reid said Boehner’s adherence to the “Hastert Rule” requiring a majority of Republican caucus votes to move legislation is emblematic of the lower chamber’s dysfunction.[14]

“Eventually he’ll be forced to take the bill that we passed here, or the country will be left with no immigration reform at all. Which is a bad, bad outcome. I remind the speaker there is no shame in passing bills both parties can support,” Reid said.[14]

Impact on 2014 elections and beyond

Several Republican members of the U.S. House might face a tougher path to re-election in 2014 if immigration reform does not pass in the House this year, according to a Public Policy Poll released on July 9, 2013.[15]

According to the poll, a majority of voters in seven Republican congressional districts would be less likely to vote for their current representative if he fails support immigration reform. Voters also reported in the poll that they would be less likely to support Republican candidates in the 2014 general election if the Republican House members block the current immigration reform proposal.[15] The seven Representatives include Jeff Denham, David Valadao and Gary Miller, all of California, Mike Coffman of Colorado, John Kline of Minnesota, Joe Heck of Nevada and Mike Grimm of New York.[15]

Speaker John Boehner told House Republicans in a closed-door meeting on July 10, 2013 that the internal debate over immigration reform is an “important conversation," and that while the House will not take up the Senate-passed bill, members must do something to address the issue.[16]

Since the Senate passed its comprehensive immigration reform bill, House Republicans have the party on their shoulders: if they can’t pass a bill, it could hurt the party's relationship with Hispanic voters for years to come, and cement the idea that the party is a roadblock to bipartisan legislation.[16]

A rare coalition with groups from across the political spectrum are looking for ways to convince member of the House to act.[17] The heads of the conservative American Action Forum, Americans of Tax Reform and the American Conservative Union sent a joint letter to congressional leaders calling for passage of a comprehensive bill. Labor groups are dispatching members to congressional offices and running ads in a dozen House districts.[17] The Evangelical Immigration Table, a coalition of Christian groups are holding a gathering in Washington D.C. in July 2013.[17]

Notable support for the immigration reform bill

In addition to numerous Democratic senators, notable Republicans and Republican groups have announced their support for the bill.
They include[18]:

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 ABC News "Who Are the Gang Of 8 in Senate Immigration Debate?" Accessed May 7, 2013
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Washington Post "Gang of Eight immigration plan: Reality-based legislating" Accessed May 7, 2013
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Congressional Research Service "Gang of Four" Accessed May 21, 2013
  4. The New York Times "Report Questions Legality of Briefings on Surveillance" January 19, 2006
  5. 5.0 5.1 Washington Post "Rubio currently opposes own immigration bill" Accessed June 5, 2013
  6. 6.0 6.1 Politico "Rubio: Most of immigration bill in 'perfect shape'" Accessed June 17, 2013
  7. Fox News, "House votes to resume deporting young DREAM Act immigrants," Accessed June 10, 2013
  8. 8.0 8.1 Politico "CBO score brings good news for Gang of Eight" Accessed June 19, 2013
  9. Politico "Roll Call Vote: Cornyn Amendment" Accessed June 20, 2013
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 Politico "Senate kills John Cornyn border security amendment" Accessed June 20, 2013
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 NY Times "Immigration Overhaul Passes in Senate" Accessed June 27, 2013
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 CNN "Senate passes sweeping immigration bill" Accessed June 27, 2013
  13. Politico "Harry Reid needles John Boehner over Hastert rule" Accessed July 8, 2013
  14. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named hastert
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Politico "7 GOPers who need immigration vote" Accessed July 9, 2013
  16. 16.0 16.1 Politico "Behind closed doors, Boehner pushes immigration action" Accessed July 10, 2013
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Yahoo "Liberal, conservative groups push for immigration bill in the House" Accessed July 10, 2013
  18. The Washington Post, "Ominous signs of progress for immigration bill," Accessed June 20, 2013
  19. Politico "Orrin Hatch op-ed backs Senate immigration plan" Accessed June 25, 2013