Difference between revisions of "Harrison Library Levy Addition (August 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(updated election)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Harrison Library Levy Addition''' measure will be on the [[August 7, 2012 ballot measures in Michigan|August 7, 2012]] ballot in the Harrison library district area, which is in [[Clare County, Michigan ballot measures|Clare County]].
+
A '''Harrison Library Levy Addition''' measure was on the [[August 7, 2012 ballot measures in Michigan|August 7, 2012]] ballot in the Harrison library district area, which is in [[Clare County, Michigan ballot measures|Clare County]].
  
This measure seeks to add to the current library levy by a rate of $.95 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of eight years in order to further pay for library operational costs in the district.<ref>[http://www.clareco.net/elections/election_docs/2012/aug_2012/frost.pdf ''Clare County Elections'', August Sample Ballot]</ref>
+
This measure was '''defeated'''
 +
* '''YES''' 57 (26.03%)
 +
* '''NO''' 162 (73.97%){{defeated}}<ref>[http://www.clareco.net/elections/results/2012_election_results/results_docs_8-7-2012/summary_all_proposals.pdf ''Clare County Elections'', August Election Results]</ref>
 +
 
 +
This measure sought to add to the current library levy by a rate of $.95 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of eight years in order to further pay for library operational costs in the district.<ref>[http://www.clareco.net/elections/election_docs/2012/aug_2012/frost.pdf ''Clare County Elections'', August Sample Ballot]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 14:14, 20 August 2012

A Harrison Library Levy Addition measure was on the August 7, 2012 ballot in the Harrison library district area, which is in Clare County.

This measure was defeated

  • YES 57 (26.03%)
  • NO 162 (73.97%)Defeatedd[1]

This measure sought to add to the current library levy by a rate of $.95 per $1,000 of assessed value for a period of eight years in order to further pay for library operational costs in the district.[2]

References