Idaho Hunting and Fishing Amendment, HJR 2 (2012)
|Status:||On the ballot|
Text of the measure
The following is ballot language that will appear before voters:
|“||Shall Article I, of the Constitution of the State of Idaho be amended by the addition of a New Section 23, to provide that the rights to hunt, fish and trap, including by the use of traditional methods, are a valued part of the heritage of the State of Idaho and shall forever be preserved for the people and managed through the laws, rules and proclamations that preserve the future of hunting, fishing and trapping; to provide that public hunting, fishing and trapping of wildlife shall be a preferred means of managing wildlife; and to provide that the rights set forth do not create a right to trespass on private property, shall not affect rights to divert, appropriate and use water, or establish any minimum amount of water in any water body, shall not lead to a diminution of other private rights, and shall not prevent the suspension or revocation, pursuant to statute enacted by the Legislature, of an individual's hunting, fishing or trapping license?||”|
The following is information obtained from the supporting side of the measure:
- Sen. Heider, the measure’s lead sponsor in the state senate said, “I maintain that this amendment does indeed clarify our rights. I think this is a great amendment...The people of Idaho love to hunt, fish and trap.”
- Heider later stated, "I don't think anybody delights in being cruel. To make an animal suffer, that's just not something we do.”
- According to Andy White of the Idaho Trappers Association, "In Idaho, trappers are required to check traps once every 72 hours. But most check once every 24 hours. The original mountain men, the original Idahoans, were much more involved in trapping, and that's why they came out here."
- Idahoans Against Trapping chairman Greg Moore stated, “Due to the inclusion of trapping in the amendment, if it passes, then torturing wild animals to death will have been declared legal in Idaho forever."
- Idaho resident Christine Gertschen, when contacting Ballotpedia: "Idahoans already have the privilege of hunting and fishing but it is subject to moderation by Idaho Fish and Game’s supervision. And of course all privileges come with responsibility. One of those responsibilities is to consider conservation and to respect wildlife as Fish and Game urges us. Idaho Fish and Game uses science to guide their management of Idaho’s plants and animals and that is why we must accept and abide by their regulations."
Path to the ballot
If a proposed amendment is agreed to by two-thirds of the members of both the Idaho State Senate and the Idaho House of Representatives, the proposed amendment goes on the next general election ballot.
During the week of March 20, 2012, it was reported that the language of the proposal was being re-worded. According to reports, language added by the National Rifle Association on controlling wildlife through hunting was met with opposition from the Fish and Game Commission. The main proponent of the bill, Sen. Lee Heider, tweaked the bill to alleviate those concerns, hoping those changes would result in the passage of the measure to the November 2012 ballot.
On March 27, 2012, the Idaho State Senate gave final approval for ballot access when the chamber voted 31 to 3 in favor of the proposal. The measure was previously approved by the Idaho House of Representatives.
- Magic Valley, "Heider’s Hunting Amendment Clears Committee", February 9, 2012
- Idaho Secretary of State, "2012 GENERAL ELECTION PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS", Retrieved October 12, 2012
- Idaho Reporter, "Idahoans to vote on hunting, fishing amendment", March 27, 2012
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named
Cite error: Invalid
- Idaho Spokesman, "Trapping clause draws objections as right-to-hunt amendment heads for Nov. ballot", July 23, 2012
- Magic Valley, "More Changes Planned for Right to Hunt Amendment", March 20, 2012